veeto
Home
Bills
Feedback
hamburger
    Privacy PolicyResources
    © 2025 Veeto.
    AB-60
    Health & Public Health

    Cosmetic safety.

    Enrolled
    CA
    ∙
    2025-2026 Regular Session
    0
    0
    Track
    Track

    Key Takeaways

    • Mandates bans on musk ambrette, musk tibetene, musk moskene, and musk xylene in cosmetics.
    • Imposes musk ketone limits by product type starting January 1, 2027.
    • Adds boric acid labeling for vaginal suppositories from 2027 and a 2035 ban if not FDA regulated.

    Summary

    Assembly Member Papan’s Musk Reduction Act tightens California’s cosmetic-safety framework by adding musk-related substances to the prohibited list and establishing product-specific limits for musk ketone. Beginning January 1, 2025, cosmetic products may not contain certain intentionally added ingredients, including musk ambrette, musk tibetene, musk moskene, and musk xylene, among a broader set of substances (such as certain phthalates, formaldehyde-related compounds, mercury, and various colorants and PFAS). In addition, the use of musk ketone would be limited across product categories starting January 1, 2027, with thresholds of up to 1.4 percent in fine fragrance products, 0.56 percent in eau de toilette, 0 percent in oral products, and 0.042 percent in all other products; “oral products” are defined as those intended to be applied on teeth or the mucous membranes of the oral cavity. The bill allows technically unavoidable trace quantities arising from impurities in natural or synthesized ingredients to be exempt from violation.

    The measure would amend the Health and Safety Code to implement these prohibitions and would rely on a definition of “ingredient” aligned with existing regulatory language. It contemplates coordination with a companion statutory change so that the musk-restriction provisions operate in concert with another bill’s amendments; the operative provisions would come into effect only if both measures are enacted and this bill is enacted after the companion. In addition to the musk-specific provisions, the act incorporates a framework for regulatory alignment and defines the conditions under which a product containing listed substances would trigger a violation, including the treatment of trace quantities and the meaning of key terms used in the prohibition.

    Separate but related provisions address boric acid in vaginal products. Beginning January 1, 2027, a vaginal suppository containing intentionally added boric acid would require on-package labeling with a detailed warning about potential health considerations and contraindications, including guidance to consult a doctor and specific cautions about pregnancy and use with condoms. Beginning January 1, 2035, no vaginal suppository containing boric acid may be manufactured, sold, or offered for sale, subject to an exception if the product becomes regulated as a drug by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. The same section clarifies that if the product’s manufacturing process results in trace quantities from impurities, the product would not be deemed in violation, and it relies on a defined meaning of “ingredient.”

    From a policy perspective, the act situates musk-related safety concerns within a broader cosmetic-regulation framework by specifying specific ingredient bans, concentration caps by product category, trace-quantity exceptions, and targeted labeling requirements for a particular vaginal-use product. It reflects an intent to standardize ingredient risk considerations across product types while enabling parallel changes that are contingent on the enactment of a companion measure. The measure has progressed through the legislative process with amendments and approvals in 2025 and is subject to further action as part of the ongoing public-health and consumer-safety regulatory agenda.

    Key Dates

    Vote on Assembly Floor
    Assembly Floor
    Vote on Assembly Floor
    AB 60 Papan Concurrence in Senate Amendments
    Vote on Senate Floor
    Senate Floor
    Vote on Senate Floor
    Assembly 3rd Reading AB60 Papan By Weber Pierson
    Senate Environmental Quality Hearing
    Senate Committee
    Senate Environmental Quality Hearing
    Do pass as amended
    Vote on Assembly Floor
    Assembly Floor
    Vote on Assembly Floor
    AB 60 Papan Assembly Third Reading
    Assembly Environmental Safety And Toxic Materials Hearing
    Assembly Committee
    Assembly Environmental Safety And Toxic Materials Hearing
    Do pass
    Introduced
    Assembly Floor
    Introduced
    Read first time. To print.

    Contacts

    Profile
    Diane PapanD
    Assemblymember
    Bill Author
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    0 of 1 row(s) selected.
    Page 1 of 1
    Select All Legislators
    Profile
    Diane PapanD
    Assemblymember
    Bill Author

    Get Involved

    Act Now!

    Email the authors or create an email template to send to all relevant legislators.

    Introduced By

    Diane Papan
    Diane PapanD
    California State Assembly Member
    70% progression
    Bill has passed both houses in identical form and is being prepared for the Governor (9/9/2025)

    Latest Voting History

    View History
    September 9, 2025
    PASS
    Assembly Floor
    Vote on Assembly Floor
    AyesNoesNVRTotalResult
    6521380PASS

    Key Takeaways

    • Mandates bans on musk ambrette, musk tibetene, musk moskene, and musk xylene in cosmetics.
    • Imposes musk ketone limits by product type starting January 1, 2027.
    • Adds boric acid labeling for vaginal suppositories from 2027 and a 2035 ban if not FDA regulated.

    Get Involved

    Act Now!

    Email the authors or create an email template to send to all relevant legislators.

    Introduced By

    Diane Papan
    Diane PapanD
    California State Assembly Member

    Summary

    Assembly Member Papan’s Musk Reduction Act tightens California’s cosmetic-safety framework by adding musk-related substances to the prohibited list and establishing product-specific limits for musk ketone. Beginning January 1, 2025, cosmetic products may not contain certain intentionally added ingredients, including musk ambrette, musk tibetene, musk moskene, and musk xylene, among a broader set of substances (such as certain phthalates, formaldehyde-related compounds, mercury, and various colorants and PFAS). In addition, the use of musk ketone would be limited across product categories starting January 1, 2027, with thresholds of up to 1.4 percent in fine fragrance products, 0.56 percent in eau de toilette, 0 percent in oral products, and 0.042 percent in all other products; “oral products” are defined as those intended to be applied on teeth or the mucous membranes of the oral cavity. The bill allows technically unavoidable trace quantities arising from impurities in natural or synthesized ingredients to be exempt from violation.

    The measure would amend the Health and Safety Code to implement these prohibitions and would rely on a definition of “ingredient” aligned with existing regulatory language. It contemplates coordination with a companion statutory change so that the musk-restriction provisions operate in concert with another bill’s amendments; the operative provisions would come into effect only if both measures are enacted and this bill is enacted after the companion. In addition to the musk-specific provisions, the act incorporates a framework for regulatory alignment and defines the conditions under which a product containing listed substances would trigger a violation, including the treatment of trace quantities and the meaning of key terms used in the prohibition.

    Separate but related provisions address boric acid in vaginal products. Beginning January 1, 2027, a vaginal suppository containing intentionally added boric acid would require on-package labeling with a detailed warning about potential health considerations and contraindications, including guidance to consult a doctor and specific cautions about pregnancy and use with condoms. Beginning January 1, 2035, no vaginal suppository containing boric acid may be manufactured, sold, or offered for sale, subject to an exception if the product becomes regulated as a drug by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. The same section clarifies that if the product’s manufacturing process results in trace quantities from impurities, the product would not be deemed in violation, and it relies on a defined meaning of “ingredient.”

    From a policy perspective, the act situates musk-related safety concerns within a broader cosmetic-regulation framework by specifying specific ingredient bans, concentration caps by product category, trace-quantity exceptions, and targeted labeling requirements for a particular vaginal-use product. It reflects an intent to standardize ingredient risk considerations across product types while enabling parallel changes that are contingent on the enactment of a companion measure. The measure has progressed through the legislative process with amendments and approvals in 2025 and is subject to further action as part of the ongoing public-health and consumer-safety regulatory agenda.

    70% progression
    Bill has passed both houses in identical form and is being prepared for the Governor (9/9/2025)

    Key Dates

    Vote on Assembly Floor
    Assembly Floor
    Vote on Assembly Floor
    AB 60 Papan Concurrence in Senate Amendments
    Vote on Senate Floor
    Senate Floor
    Vote on Senate Floor
    Assembly 3rd Reading AB60 Papan By Weber Pierson
    Senate Environmental Quality Hearing
    Senate Committee
    Senate Environmental Quality Hearing
    Do pass as amended
    Vote on Assembly Floor
    Assembly Floor
    Vote on Assembly Floor
    AB 60 Papan Assembly Third Reading
    Assembly Environmental Safety And Toxic Materials Hearing
    Assembly Committee
    Assembly Environmental Safety And Toxic Materials Hearing
    Do pass
    Introduced
    Assembly Floor
    Introduced
    Read first time. To print.

    Latest Voting History

    View History
    September 9, 2025
    PASS
    Assembly Floor
    Vote on Assembly Floor
    AyesNoesNVRTotalResult
    6521380PASS

    Contacts

    Profile
    Diane PapanD
    Assemblymember
    Bill Author
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    0 of 1 row(s) selected.
    Page 1 of 1
    Select All Legislators
    Profile
    Diane PapanD
    Assemblymember
    Bill Author