veeto
Home
Bills
Feedback
hamburger
    Privacy PolicyResources
    © 2025 Veeto.
    SB-53
    Technology & Innovation

    Artificial intelligence models: large developers.

    Enrolled
    CA
    ∙
    2025-2026 Regular Session
    1
    4
    Track
    Track

    Key Takeaways

    • Requires large frontier developers to publish a frontier AI framework with mitigations.
    • Establishes CalCompute in the GOA, operable by appropriation; report due January 1, 2027.
    • Imposes whistleblower protections with penalties up to one million dollars per violation.

    Summary

    Senator Wiener, joined by Senator Rubio, advances a Transparency in Frontier Artificial Intelligence Act that codifies a state-wide transparency and risk-management regime for frontier AI while launching a state cloud initiative to support safe, equitable AI deployment and governance. The measure creates a comprehensive framework governing the development and use of frontier AI models, defining key terms such as frontier models, frontier developers, and catastrophic risk, and sets a framework for public-facing disclosures, risk assessments, and oversight mechanisms.

    Under the act, large frontier developers—defined by substantial annual revenue—would be required to write, publish, and continuously maintain a detailed frontier AI framework on their public website. The framework must describe how national and international standards and industry practices are incorporated, how thresholds identifying potential catastrophic capabilities are defined and assessed, and how mitigations are applied based on those assessments. It also requires plans for independent third-party assessments, ongoing updates in response to substantial changes, cybersecurity measures to protect unreleased model weights, procedures to identify and respond to critical safety incidents, and internal governance structures to ensure proper implementation. Before deploying a frontier model or a substantially modified version, the developer must publish a transparency report detailing the model’s release date, languages, outputs, intended uses, and any restrictions, along with summaries of catastrophic-risk assessments and third-party involvement.

    The bill also establishes a mechanism for incident reporting and oversight through the Office of Emergency Services, including a public-facing process for reporting critical safety incidents and a confidential channel for internal risk assessments. Reports of critical safety incidents discovered by frontier developers must be filed with OES within 15 days, with rapid notification (within 24 hours) for imminent risk. The OES would compile anonymized, aggregated annual reports for the Legislature and Governor, while preserving trade secrets and national security concerns. Public records exemptions shield certain reports from disclosure, and the act provides for penalties of up to a million dollars per violation for large frontier developers that fail to comply, with enforcement by the Attorney General.

    In addition, the act creates CalCompute, a state public cloud computing framework overseen by the Government Operations Agency and supported by a 14-member consortium, including representation from the University of California and other academic bodies, labor organizations, public-interest stakeholders, and AI experts. CalCompute is designed to advance safe, ethical, and equitable AI deployment and expand access to computational resources, with a report due to the Legislature by early 2027 that analyzes landscape, costs, governance, eligibility, workforce implications, and potential partnerships. The consortium’s establishment and CalCompute operations hinge on budgetary appropriation, and the measure preempts local rules enacted after 2025 that regulate frontier developers’ management of catastrophic risk, consolidating policy authority at the state level. Additionally, the Department of Technology would annually refine core definitions of frontier model and related terms and issue recommendations to align with evolving standards, while the Labor Code provisions create whistleblower protections for covered employees who raise concerns about catastrophic risks, including an internal disclosure process, remedies, and potential attorney’s fees for successful actions.

    Key Dates

    Vote on Senate Floor
    Senate Floor
    Vote on Senate Floor
    Unfinished Business SB53 Wiener et al. Concurrence
    Vote on Assembly Floor
    Assembly Floor
    Vote on Assembly Floor
    SB 53 Wiener Senate Third Reading By BAUER-KAHAN
    Vote on Senate Floor
    Senate Floor
    Vote on Senate Floor
    Unfinished Business SB53 Wiener et al. Concurrence
    Assembly Committee
    Do pass
    Assembly Appropriations Hearing
    Assembly Committee
    Assembly Appropriations Hearing
    Do pass as amended
    Assembly Privacy And Consumer Protection Hearing
    Assembly Committee
    Assembly Privacy And Consumer Protection Hearing
    Do pass as amended and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]
    Assembly Judiciary Hearing
    Assembly Committee
    Assembly Judiciary Hearing
    Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Privacy and Consumer Protection]
    Assembly Judiciary Hearing
    Assembly Committee
    Assembly Judiciary Hearing
    Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Privacy and Consumer Protection]
    Vote on Senate Floor
    Senate Floor
    Vote on Senate Floor
    Senate 3rd Reading SB53 Wiener
    Senate Appropriations Hearing
    Senate Committee
    Senate Appropriations Hearing
    Do pass as amended
    Senate Appropriations Hearing
    Senate Committee
    Senate Appropriations Hearing
    Placed on suspense file
    Senate Judiciary Hearing
    Senate Committee
    Senate Judiciary Hearing
    Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations] with the recommendation: To Consent Calendar
    Senate Governmental Organization Hearing
    Senate Committee
    Senate Governmental Organization Hearing
    Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to the Committee on [Judiciary]
    Introduced
    Senate Floor
    Introduced
    Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

    Contacts

    Profile
    Scott WienerD
    Senator
    Bill Author
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    Profile
    Susan RubioD
    Senator
    Bill Author
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    0 of 2 row(s) selected.
    Page 1 of 1
    Select All Legislators
    Profile
    Scott WienerD
    Senator
    Bill Author
    Profile
    Susan RubioD
    Senator
    Bill Author

    Get Involved

    Act Now!

    Email the authors or create an email template to send to all relevant legislators.

    Introduced By

    Scott Wiener
    Scott WienerD
    California State Senator
    Co-Author
    Susan Rubio
    Susan RubioD
    California State Senator
    70% progression
    Bill has passed both houses in identical form and is being prepared for the Governor (9/13/2025)

    Latest Voting History

    View History
    September 13, 2025
    PASS
    Senate Floor
    Vote on Senate Floor
    AyesNoesNVRTotalResult
    298340PASS

    Key Takeaways

    • Requires large frontier developers to publish a frontier AI framework with mitigations.
    • Establishes CalCompute in the GOA, operable by appropriation; report due January 1, 2027.
    • Imposes whistleblower protections with penalties up to one million dollars per violation.

    Get Involved

    Act Now!

    Email the authors or create an email template to send to all relevant legislators.

    Introduced By

    Scott Wiener
    Scott WienerD
    California State Senator
    Co-Author
    Susan Rubio
    Susan RubioD
    California State Senator

    Summary

    Senator Wiener, joined by Senator Rubio, advances a Transparency in Frontier Artificial Intelligence Act that codifies a state-wide transparency and risk-management regime for frontier AI while launching a state cloud initiative to support safe, equitable AI deployment and governance. The measure creates a comprehensive framework governing the development and use of frontier AI models, defining key terms such as frontier models, frontier developers, and catastrophic risk, and sets a framework for public-facing disclosures, risk assessments, and oversight mechanisms.

    Under the act, large frontier developers—defined by substantial annual revenue—would be required to write, publish, and continuously maintain a detailed frontier AI framework on their public website. The framework must describe how national and international standards and industry practices are incorporated, how thresholds identifying potential catastrophic capabilities are defined and assessed, and how mitigations are applied based on those assessments. It also requires plans for independent third-party assessments, ongoing updates in response to substantial changes, cybersecurity measures to protect unreleased model weights, procedures to identify and respond to critical safety incidents, and internal governance structures to ensure proper implementation. Before deploying a frontier model or a substantially modified version, the developer must publish a transparency report detailing the model’s release date, languages, outputs, intended uses, and any restrictions, along with summaries of catastrophic-risk assessments and third-party involvement.

    The bill also establishes a mechanism for incident reporting and oversight through the Office of Emergency Services, including a public-facing process for reporting critical safety incidents and a confidential channel for internal risk assessments. Reports of critical safety incidents discovered by frontier developers must be filed with OES within 15 days, with rapid notification (within 24 hours) for imminent risk. The OES would compile anonymized, aggregated annual reports for the Legislature and Governor, while preserving trade secrets and national security concerns. Public records exemptions shield certain reports from disclosure, and the act provides for penalties of up to a million dollars per violation for large frontier developers that fail to comply, with enforcement by the Attorney General.

    In addition, the act creates CalCompute, a state public cloud computing framework overseen by the Government Operations Agency and supported by a 14-member consortium, including representation from the University of California and other academic bodies, labor organizations, public-interest stakeholders, and AI experts. CalCompute is designed to advance safe, ethical, and equitable AI deployment and expand access to computational resources, with a report due to the Legislature by early 2027 that analyzes landscape, costs, governance, eligibility, workforce implications, and potential partnerships. The consortium’s establishment and CalCompute operations hinge on budgetary appropriation, and the measure preempts local rules enacted after 2025 that regulate frontier developers’ management of catastrophic risk, consolidating policy authority at the state level. Additionally, the Department of Technology would annually refine core definitions of frontier model and related terms and issue recommendations to align with evolving standards, while the Labor Code provisions create whistleblower protections for covered employees who raise concerns about catastrophic risks, including an internal disclosure process, remedies, and potential attorney’s fees for successful actions.

    70% progression
    Bill has passed both houses in identical form and is being prepared for the Governor (9/13/2025)

    Key Dates

    Vote on Senate Floor
    Senate Floor
    Vote on Senate Floor
    Unfinished Business SB53 Wiener et al. Concurrence
    Vote on Assembly Floor
    Assembly Floor
    Vote on Assembly Floor
    SB 53 Wiener Senate Third Reading By BAUER-KAHAN
    Vote on Senate Floor
    Senate Floor
    Vote on Senate Floor
    Unfinished Business SB53 Wiener et al. Concurrence
    Assembly Committee
    Do pass
    Assembly Appropriations Hearing
    Assembly Committee
    Assembly Appropriations Hearing
    Do pass as amended
    Assembly Privacy And Consumer Protection Hearing
    Assembly Committee
    Assembly Privacy And Consumer Protection Hearing
    Do pass as amended and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]
    Assembly Judiciary Hearing
    Assembly Committee
    Assembly Judiciary Hearing
    Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Privacy and Consumer Protection]
    Assembly Judiciary Hearing
    Assembly Committee
    Assembly Judiciary Hearing
    Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Privacy and Consumer Protection]
    Vote on Senate Floor
    Senate Floor
    Vote on Senate Floor
    Senate 3rd Reading SB53 Wiener
    Senate Appropriations Hearing
    Senate Committee
    Senate Appropriations Hearing
    Do pass as amended
    Senate Appropriations Hearing
    Senate Committee
    Senate Appropriations Hearing
    Placed on suspense file
    Senate Judiciary Hearing
    Senate Committee
    Senate Judiciary Hearing
    Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations] with the recommendation: To Consent Calendar
    Senate Governmental Organization Hearing
    Senate Committee
    Senate Governmental Organization Hearing
    Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to the Committee on [Judiciary]
    Introduced
    Senate Floor
    Introduced
    Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

    Latest Voting History

    View History
    September 13, 2025
    PASS
    Senate Floor
    Vote on Senate Floor
    AyesNoesNVRTotalResult
    298340PASS

    Contacts

    Profile
    Scott WienerD
    Senator
    Bill Author
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    Profile
    Susan RubioD
    Senator
    Bill Author
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    0 of 2 row(s) selected.
    Page 1 of 1
    Select All Legislators
    Profile
    Scott WienerD
    Senator
    Bill Author
    Profile
    Susan RubioD
    Senator
    Bill Author