AB-339
Labor & Employment

Local public employee organizations: notice requirements.

Enrolled
CA
2025-2026 Regular Session
0
0
Track

Key Takeaways

  • Requires 45-day notice before issuing RFPs, RFQs, or renewing/extending contracts.
  • Requires notice include duration, scope, cost, draft solicitation, and rationale.
  • Exempts construction and public works contracts; allows practicable notice in emergencies.
  • Declares no state reimbursement; local agencies may pursue remedies under existing law via PERB.

Summary

Ortega’s measure would mandate a 45-day written notice to recognized employee organizations before local public agencies issue requests for proposals, requests for quotes, or renew or extend contracts for services that fall within the scope of work of the represented classifications, with the notice detailing the contract’s anticipated duration, scope of work, anticipated cost, the draft solicitation or typical solicitation content, and the reason the contract is deemed necessary.

Exceptions and clarifications accompany the new requirement: emergencies or exigent circumstances permit shorter notice “as practicable,” and certain contracts are exempt, notably construction-related work subject to specified labor code provisions and services related to public works or infrastructure projects subject to uniform codes or standards. The measure preserves existing bargaining rights and MOUs, and it does not override other notice or meet-and-confer requirements already in law. It also states there is no state reimbursement for the local costs created by the mandate, though agencies may pursue remedies under existing law.

The proposal sits within the Meyers-Milias-Brown Act framework by expanding procurement-related notice obligations to better inform unions about upcoming work that affects their members, while leaving intact the broader structure of labor relations enforcement, including the role of the Public Employment Relations Board and the existing complaint and settlement processes. Enforceability would follow the current channels for compliance with local employment and bargaining laws, and implementation would require agencies to integrate the 45-day timeline into procurement planning, including coordination with labor organizations and assembly of the required notice content.

Key Dates

Vote on Assembly Floor
Assembly Floor
Vote on Assembly Floor
AB 339 Ortega Concurrence in Senate Amendments
Vote on Senate Floor
Senate Floor
Vote on Senate Floor
Assembly 3rd Reading AB339 Ortega By Durazo
Senate Appropriations Hearing
Senate Committee
Senate Appropriations Hearing
Do pass as amended
Senate Appropriations Hearing
Senate Committee
Senate Appropriations Hearing
Placed on suspense file
Senate Labor, Public Employment and Retirement Hearing
Senate Committee
Senate Labor, Public Employment and Retirement Hearing
Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to the Committee on [Appropriations]
Vote on Assembly Floor
Assembly Floor
Vote on Assembly Floor
AB 339 Ortega Assembly Third Reading
Assembly Appropriations Hearing
Assembly Committee
Assembly Appropriations Hearing
Do pass as amended
Assembly Public Employment And Retirement Hearing
Assembly Committee
Assembly Public Employment And Retirement Hearing
Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]
Introduced
Assembly Floor
Introduced
Read first time. To print.

Contacts

Profile
Liz OrtegaD
Assemblymember
Bill Author
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
0 of 1 row(s) selected.
Page 1 of 1
Select All Legislators
Profile
Liz OrtegaD
Assemblymember
Bill Author

Get Involved

Act Now!

Email the authors or create an email template to send to all relevant legislators.

Introduced By

Liz Ortega
Liz OrtegaD
California State Assembly Member
70% progression
Bill has passed both houses in identical form and is being prepared for the Governor (9/8/2025)

Latest Voting History

September 8, 2025
PASS
Assembly Floor
Vote on Assembly Floor
AyesNoesNVRTotalResult
52121680PASS

Key Takeaways

  • Requires 45-day notice before issuing RFPs, RFQs, or renewing/extending contracts.
  • Requires notice include duration, scope, cost, draft solicitation, and rationale.
  • Exempts construction and public works contracts; allows practicable notice in emergencies.
  • Declares no state reimbursement; local agencies may pursue remedies under existing law via PERB.

Get Involved

Act Now!

Email the authors or create an email template to send to all relevant legislators.

Introduced By

Liz Ortega
Liz OrtegaD
California State Assembly Member

Summary

Ortega’s measure would mandate a 45-day written notice to recognized employee organizations before local public agencies issue requests for proposals, requests for quotes, or renew or extend contracts for services that fall within the scope of work of the represented classifications, with the notice detailing the contract’s anticipated duration, scope of work, anticipated cost, the draft solicitation or typical solicitation content, and the reason the contract is deemed necessary.

Exceptions and clarifications accompany the new requirement: emergencies or exigent circumstances permit shorter notice “as practicable,” and certain contracts are exempt, notably construction-related work subject to specified labor code provisions and services related to public works or infrastructure projects subject to uniform codes or standards. The measure preserves existing bargaining rights and MOUs, and it does not override other notice or meet-and-confer requirements already in law. It also states there is no state reimbursement for the local costs created by the mandate, though agencies may pursue remedies under existing law.

The proposal sits within the Meyers-Milias-Brown Act framework by expanding procurement-related notice obligations to better inform unions about upcoming work that affects their members, while leaving intact the broader structure of labor relations enforcement, including the role of the Public Employment Relations Board and the existing complaint and settlement processes. Enforceability would follow the current channels for compliance with local employment and bargaining laws, and implementation would require agencies to integrate the 45-day timeline into procurement planning, including coordination with labor organizations and assembly of the required notice content.

70% progression
Bill has passed both houses in identical form and is being prepared for the Governor (9/8/2025)

Key Dates

Vote on Assembly Floor
Assembly Floor
Vote on Assembly Floor
AB 339 Ortega Concurrence in Senate Amendments
Vote on Senate Floor
Senate Floor
Vote on Senate Floor
Assembly 3rd Reading AB339 Ortega By Durazo
Senate Appropriations Hearing
Senate Committee
Senate Appropriations Hearing
Do pass as amended
Senate Appropriations Hearing
Senate Committee
Senate Appropriations Hearing
Placed on suspense file
Senate Labor, Public Employment and Retirement Hearing
Senate Committee
Senate Labor, Public Employment and Retirement Hearing
Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to the Committee on [Appropriations]
Vote on Assembly Floor
Assembly Floor
Vote on Assembly Floor
AB 339 Ortega Assembly Third Reading
Assembly Appropriations Hearing
Assembly Committee
Assembly Appropriations Hearing
Do pass as amended
Assembly Public Employment And Retirement Hearing
Assembly Committee
Assembly Public Employment And Retirement Hearing
Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]
Introduced
Assembly Floor
Introduced
Read first time. To print.

Latest Voting History

September 8, 2025
PASS
Assembly Floor
Vote on Assembly Floor
AyesNoesNVRTotalResult
52121680PASS

Contacts

Profile
Liz OrtegaD
Assemblymember
Bill Author
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
0 of 1 row(s) selected.
Page 1 of 1
Select All Legislators
Profile
Liz OrtegaD
Assemblymember
Bill Author