SB-232
Energy & Environment

California Environmental Quality Act: guidelines: study.

Introduced
CA
2025-2026 Regular Session
0
0
Track

Key Takeaways

  • Requires a study on keeping environmental review rules fixed from a project's start through completion.
  • Mandates evaluation of how fixed guidelines affect project timelines and regulatory certainty.
  • Requires submission of findings to the Governor and Legislature by January 1, 2027.
  • Automatically expires on January 1, 2028 after the study is completed.

Summary

Senator Seyarto's proposal for evaluating potential reforms to California's environmental review process directs the Office of Land Use and Climate Innovation to study how maintaining consistent regulatory guidelines throughout project reviews could affect the state's environmental protection framework.

The legislation calls for examining "locked-in guidelines" - a system where California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requirements in place when a project's notice of preparation is issued would remain fixed for that project's entire review period, regardless of subsequent regulatory changes. The Office must analyze how this approach could influence regulatory certainty, review timelines, and environmental protection quality. The study will specifically examine financial implications for projects facing guideline changes within five years of their initial notice, as well as potential effects on review efficiency and environmental safeguards.

By January 2027, the Office must report findings to the Governor and Legislature on whether locked-in guidelines could provide more predictable regulatory conditions while maintaining environmental standards. The report will include recommendations for balancing consistency needs with adaptation to emerging environmental challenges. The bill's provisions expire January 1, 2028, limiting its scope to producing analysis rather than implementing permanent changes to CEQA procedures.

Key Dates

Next Step
Referred to the Senate Standing Committee on Appropriations
Next Step
Senate Committee
Referred to the Senate Standing Committee on Appropriations
Hearing has not been scheduled yet
Senate Appropriations Hearing
Senate Committee
Senate Appropriations Hearing
Senate Appropriations Hearing
Senate Environmental Quality Hearing
Senate Committee
Senate Environmental Quality Hearing
Senate Environmental Quality Hearing
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Senate Floor
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Contacts

Profile
Anna CaballeroD
Senator
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Roger NielloR
Senator
Bill Author
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Tom LackeyR
Assemblymember
Bill Author
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Steven ChoiR
Senator
Bill Author
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Tim GraysonD
Senator
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
0 of 14 row(s) selected.
Page 1 of 3
Select All Legislators
Profile
Anna CaballeroD
Senator
Committee Member
Profile
Roger NielloR
Senator
Bill Author
Profile
Tom LackeyR
Assemblymember
Bill Author
Profile
Steven ChoiR
Senator
Bill Author
Profile
Tim GraysonD
Senator
Committee Member
Profile
Megan DahleR
Senator
Committee Member
Profile
Kelly SeyartoR
Senator
Bill Author
Profile
Rosilicie Ochoa BoghR
Senator
Bill Author
Profile
Juan AlanisR
Assemblymember
Bill Author
Profile
Joe PattersonR
Assemblymember
Bill Author
Profile
Aisha WahabD
Senator
Committee Member
Profile
Christopher CabaldonD
Senator
Committee Member
Profile
Laura RichardsonD
Senator
Committee Member
Profile
Suzette ValladaresR
Senator
Bill Author

Get Involved

Act Now!

Email the authors or create an email template to send to all relevant legislators.

Introduced By

Kelly Seyarto
Kelly SeyartoR
California State Senator
Co-Authors
Juan Alanis
Juan AlanisR
California State Assembly Member
Steven Choi
Steven ChoiR
California State Senator
Tom Lackey
Tom LackeyR
California State Assembly Member
Roger Niello
Roger NielloR
California State Senator
Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh
Rosilicie Ochoa BoghR
California State Senator
Joe Patterson
Joe PattersonR
California State Assembly Member
Suzette Valladares
Suzette ValladaresR
California State Senator
10% progression
Bill has been formally introduced and read for the first time in its house of origin (1/28/2025)

Latest Voting History

April 7, 2025
PASS
Senate Committee
Senate Appropriations Hearing
AyesNoesNVRTotalResult
7007PASS

Key Takeaways

  • Requires a study on keeping environmental review rules fixed from a project's start through completion.
  • Mandates evaluation of how fixed guidelines affect project timelines and regulatory certainty.
  • Requires submission of findings to the Governor and Legislature by January 1, 2027.
  • Automatically expires on January 1, 2028 after the study is completed.

Get Involved

Act Now!

Email the authors or create an email template to send to all relevant legislators.

Introduced By

Kelly Seyarto
Kelly SeyartoR
California State Senator
Co-Authors
Juan Alanis
Juan AlanisR
California State Assembly Member
Steven Choi
Steven ChoiR
California State Senator
Tom Lackey
Tom LackeyR
California State Assembly Member
Roger Niello
Roger NielloR
California State Senator
Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh
Rosilicie Ochoa BoghR
California State Senator
Joe Patterson
Joe PattersonR
California State Assembly Member
Suzette Valladares
Suzette ValladaresR
California State Senator

Summary

Senator Seyarto's proposal for evaluating potential reforms to California's environmental review process directs the Office of Land Use and Climate Innovation to study how maintaining consistent regulatory guidelines throughout project reviews could affect the state's environmental protection framework.

The legislation calls for examining "locked-in guidelines" - a system where California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requirements in place when a project's notice of preparation is issued would remain fixed for that project's entire review period, regardless of subsequent regulatory changes. The Office must analyze how this approach could influence regulatory certainty, review timelines, and environmental protection quality. The study will specifically examine financial implications for projects facing guideline changes within five years of their initial notice, as well as potential effects on review efficiency and environmental safeguards.

By January 2027, the Office must report findings to the Governor and Legislature on whether locked-in guidelines could provide more predictable regulatory conditions while maintaining environmental standards. The report will include recommendations for balancing consistency needs with adaptation to emerging environmental challenges. The bill's provisions expire January 1, 2028, limiting its scope to producing analysis rather than implementing permanent changes to CEQA procedures.

10% progression
Bill has been formally introduced and read for the first time in its house of origin (1/28/2025)

Key Dates

Next Step
Referred to the Senate Standing Committee on Appropriations
Next Step
Senate Committee
Referred to the Senate Standing Committee on Appropriations
Hearing has not been scheduled yet
Senate Appropriations Hearing
Senate Committee
Senate Appropriations Hearing
Senate Appropriations Hearing
Senate Environmental Quality Hearing
Senate Committee
Senate Environmental Quality Hearing
Senate Environmental Quality Hearing
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Senate Floor
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Latest Voting History

April 7, 2025
PASS
Senate Committee
Senate Appropriations Hearing
AyesNoesNVRTotalResult
7007PASS

Contacts

Profile
Anna CaballeroD
Senator
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Roger NielloR
Senator
Bill Author
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Tom LackeyR
Assemblymember
Bill Author
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Steven ChoiR
Senator
Bill Author
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Tim GraysonD
Senator
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
0 of 14 row(s) selected.
Page 1 of 3
Select All Legislators
Profile
Anna CaballeroD
Senator
Committee Member
Profile
Roger NielloR
Senator
Bill Author
Profile
Tom LackeyR
Assemblymember
Bill Author
Profile
Steven ChoiR
Senator
Bill Author
Profile
Tim GraysonD
Senator
Committee Member
Profile
Megan DahleR
Senator
Committee Member
Profile
Kelly SeyartoR
Senator
Bill Author
Profile
Rosilicie Ochoa BoghR
Senator
Bill Author
Profile
Juan AlanisR
Assemblymember
Bill Author
Profile
Joe PattersonR
Assemblymember
Bill Author
Profile
Aisha WahabD
Senator
Committee Member
Profile
Christopher CabaldonD
Senator
Committee Member
Profile
Laura RichardsonD
Senator
Committee Member
Profile
Suzette ValladaresR
Senator
Bill Author