veeto
Home
Bills
Influence
Feedback
hamburger
    Privacy PolicyResources
    © 2025 Veeto.
    AB-392
    Consumer Protection

    Pornographic internet websites: consent.

    Engrossed
    CA
    ∙
    2025-2026 Regular Session
    0
    0
    Track
    Track

    Key Takeaways

    • Requires pornographic websites to verify consent from all individuals depicted in sexually explicit content before upload.
    • Mandates users to certify all depicted individuals are adults who consented to being shown and uploaded.
    • Imposes fines up to $75,000 per violation for websites that fail to protect against non-consensual content.
    • Requires websites to verify user email addresses and maintain consent records for seven years.

    Summary

    Assembly Member Dixon's legislation establishes new requirements for pornographic website operators to verify consent and age of individuals depicted in sexually explicit content. The measure requires users to submit certification statements confirming that depicted individuals are adults who consented both to the content creation and its upload. Website operators must verify users' email addresses before allowing content uploads and maintain these records for seven years.

    The bill creates enforcement mechanisms through civil actions, allowing depicted individuals to seek damages up to $75,000 per violation, plus punitive damages and attorney fees, from both website operators and users who violate the requirements. Public prosecutors may also pursue civil penalties of $25,000 per violation. Each day that non-compliant content remains accessible constitutes a separate violation. Users who knowingly provide false certification statements face infractions carrying $1,000 fines.

    The legislation excludes email, messaging, cloud storage and file-sharing services from its scope when those functions stand alone. Content with serious literary, artistic, political or scientific value is also exempt from the requirements. Website operators can rebut presumptions of violations by demonstrating they took reasonable steps to verify consent and age of depicted individuals, consistent with their duty of care obligations under the measure.

    Key Dates

    Next Step
    Referred to the Senate Standing Committee on Public Safety
    Next Step
    Senate Committee
    Referred to the Senate Standing Committee on Public Safety
    Hearing scheduled for , 1021 O Street, Room 2200
    Senate Judiciary Hearing
    Senate Committee
    Senate Judiciary Hearing
    Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to the Committee on [Public Safety]
    Vote on Assembly Floor
    Assembly Floor
    Vote on Assembly Floor
    AB 392 Dixon Assembly Third Reading
    Assembly Appropriations Hearing
    Assembly Committee
    Assembly Appropriations Hearing
    Do pass as amended
    Assembly Judiciary Hearing
    Assembly Committee
    Assembly Judiciary Hearing
    Do pass as amended and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]
    Assembly Privacy And Consumer Protection Hearing
    Assembly Committee
    Assembly Privacy And Consumer Protection Hearing
    Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Judiciary]
    Introduced
    Assembly Floor
    Introduced
    Read first time. To print.

    Contacts

    Profile
    Anna CaballeroD
    Senator
    Committee Member
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    Profile
    Scott WienerD
    Senator
    Committee Member
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    Profile
    Lena GonzalezD
    Senator
    Committee Member
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    Profile
    Kelly SeyartoR
    Senator
    Committee Member
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    Profile
    Diane DixonR
    Assemblymember
    Bill Author
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    0 of 7 row(s) selected.
    Page 1 of 2
    Select All Legislators
    Profile
    Anna CaballeroD
    Senator
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Scott WienerD
    Senator
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Lena GonzalezD
    Senator
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Kelly SeyartoR
    Senator
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Diane DixonR
    Assemblymember
    Bill Author
    Profile
    Jesse ArreguinD
    Senator
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Sasha Renee PerezD
    Senator
    Committee Member

    Get Involved

    Act Now!

    Email the authors or create an email template to send to all relevant legislators.

    Introduced By

    Diane Dixon
    Diane DixonR
    California State Assembly Member
    40% progression
    Bill has passed all readings in its first house and is ready to move to the other house (6/5/2025)

    Latest Voting History

    View History
    July 8, 2025
    PASS
    Senate Committee
    Senate Judiciary Hearing
    AyesNoesNVRTotalResult
    130013PASS

    Key Takeaways

    • Requires pornographic websites to verify consent from all individuals depicted in sexually explicit content before upload.
    • Mandates users to certify all depicted individuals are adults who consented to being shown and uploaded.
    • Imposes fines up to $75,000 per violation for websites that fail to protect against non-consensual content.
    • Requires websites to verify user email addresses and maintain consent records for seven years.

    Get Involved

    Act Now!

    Email the authors or create an email template to send to all relevant legislators.

    Introduced By

    Diane Dixon
    Diane DixonR
    California State Assembly Member

    Summary

    Assembly Member Dixon's legislation establishes new requirements for pornographic website operators to verify consent and age of individuals depicted in sexually explicit content. The measure requires users to submit certification statements confirming that depicted individuals are adults who consented both to the content creation and its upload. Website operators must verify users' email addresses before allowing content uploads and maintain these records for seven years.

    The bill creates enforcement mechanisms through civil actions, allowing depicted individuals to seek damages up to $75,000 per violation, plus punitive damages and attorney fees, from both website operators and users who violate the requirements. Public prosecutors may also pursue civil penalties of $25,000 per violation. Each day that non-compliant content remains accessible constitutes a separate violation. Users who knowingly provide false certification statements face infractions carrying $1,000 fines.

    The legislation excludes email, messaging, cloud storage and file-sharing services from its scope when those functions stand alone. Content with serious literary, artistic, political or scientific value is also exempt from the requirements. Website operators can rebut presumptions of violations by demonstrating they took reasonable steps to verify consent and age of depicted individuals, consistent with their duty of care obligations under the measure.

    40% progression
    Bill has passed all readings in its first house and is ready to move to the other house (6/5/2025)

    Key Dates

    Next Step
    Referred to the Senate Standing Committee on Public Safety
    Next Step
    Senate Committee
    Referred to the Senate Standing Committee on Public Safety
    Hearing scheduled for , 1021 O Street, Room 2200
    Senate Judiciary Hearing
    Senate Committee
    Senate Judiciary Hearing
    Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to the Committee on [Public Safety]
    Vote on Assembly Floor
    Assembly Floor
    Vote on Assembly Floor
    AB 392 Dixon Assembly Third Reading
    Assembly Appropriations Hearing
    Assembly Committee
    Assembly Appropriations Hearing
    Do pass as amended
    Assembly Judiciary Hearing
    Assembly Committee
    Assembly Judiciary Hearing
    Do pass as amended and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]
    Assembly Privacy And Consumer Protection Hearing
    Assembly Committee
    Assembly Privacy And Consumer Protection Hearing
    Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Judiciary]
    Introduced
    Assembly Floor
    Introduced
    Read first time. To print.

    Latest Voting History

    View History
    July 8, 2025
    PASS
    Senate Committee
    Senate Judiciary Hearing
    AyesNoesNVRTotalResult
    130013PASS

    Contacts

    Profile
    Anna CaballeroD
    Senator
    Committee Member
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    Profile
    Scott WienerD
    Senator
    Committee Member
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    Profile
    Lena GonzalezD
    Senator
    Committee Member
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    Profile
    Kelly SeyartoR
    Senator
    Committee Member
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    Profile
    Diane DixonR
    Assemblymember
    Bill Author
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    0 of 7 row(s) selected.
    Page 1 of 2
    Select All Legislators
    Profile
    Anna CaballeroD
    Senator
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Scott WienerD
    Senator
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Lena GonzalezD
    Senator
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Kelly SeyartoR
    Senator
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Diane DixonR
    Assemblymember
    Bill Author
    Profile
    Jesse ArreguinD
    Senator
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Sasha Renee PerezD
    Senator
    Committee Member