AB-400
Justice & Public Safety

Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training: police canines.

Enrolled
CA
2025-2026 Regular Session
0
0
Track

Key Takeaways

  • Requires POST to study and issue recommendations on police canines by 2028.
  • Directs the study to cover patrol use, detection, obedience standards, warnings, and review factors.
  • Repeals the requirement on July 1, 2031.
  • Declares no funding is requested and requires fiscal committee oversight.

Summary

Assembly Member Pacheco guides a time-bound, study-focused measure that directs the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training to examine how police canines are used in law enforcement and to prepare recommendations for the Legislature.

The core directive establishes a temporary requirement for POST to study canine deployments and report back by mid-2028. The study must address: the community and law enforcement implications of canine use with an emphasis on safeguarding life, dignity, and liberty without prejudice; the fair and unbiased performance of duties by officers, including use of force involving canines; appropriate patrol applications with a canine (encompassing obedience, searches, apprehension, and handler protection); appropriate detection applications (including control, alert, and odor detection); factors for evaluating and reviewing all canine use-of-force incidents; and additional safety considerations such as warning protocols before releasing a canine within a deployment area. The reporting obligation references established Government Code processes, and the new provision contains a sunset repealing the requirement on a specified future date.

From a regulatory perspective, the measure does not itself alter existing canine deployment standards or penal statutes; rather, it creates a one-time, finite study obligation for POST and outlines the timetable for delivering recommendations to the Legislature. The fiscal note is open to oversight, as the measure does not include an explicit appropriation but requires review by the fiscal committee, with implementation anchored in POST’s duties within the Department of Justice and the existing Government Code framework governing reporting and sunset provisions. The sunset date ensures the provision expires unless renewed by subsequent legislation.

Key Dates

Vote on Assembly Floor
Assembly Floor
Vote on Assembly Floor
AB 400 Pacheco Concurrence in Senate Amendments
Vote on Senate Floor
Senate Floor
Vote on Senate Floor
Special Consent AB400 Pacheco et al. By Rubio
Senate Appropriations Hearing
Senate Committee
Senate Appropriations Hearing
Do pass as amended
Senate Appropriations Hearing
Senate Committee
Senate Appropriations Hearing
Placed on suspense file
Senate Public Safety Hearing
Senate Committee
Senate Public Safety Hearing
Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]
Vote on Assembly Floor
Assembly Floor
Vote on Assembly Floor
AB 400 Pacheco Assembly Third Reading
Assembly Appropriations Hearing
Assembly Committee
Assembly Appropriations Hearing
Do pass
Assembly Public Safety Hearing
Assembly Committee
Assembly Public Safety Hearing
Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]
Introduced
Assembly Floor
Introduced
Read first time. To print.

Contacts

Profile
James RamosD
Assemblymember
Bill Author
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Juan AlanisR
Assemblymember
Bill Author
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Blanca PachecoD
Assemblymember
Bill Author
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Patrick AhrensD
Assemblymember
Bill Author
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Michelle RodriguezD
Assemblymember
Bill Author
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
0 of 5 row(s) selected.
Page 1 of 1
Select All Legislators
Profile
James RamosD
Assemblymember
Bill Author
Profile
Juan AlanisR
Assemblymember
Bill Author
Profile
Blanca PachecoD
Assemblymember
Bill Author
Profile
Patrick AhrensD
Assemblymember
Bill Author
Profile
Michelle RodriguezD
Assemblymember
Bill Author

Similar Past Legislation

Bill NumberTitleIntroduced DateStatusLink to Bill
AB-3241
Law enforcement: police canines.
February 2024
Failed
AB-2042
Police canines: guidelines.
February 2024
Failed
Showing 2 of 2 items
Page 1 of 1

Get Involved

Act Now!

Email the authors or create an email template to send to all relevant legislators.

Introduced By

Blanca Pacheco
Blanca PachecoD
California State Assembly Member
Co-Authors
James Ramos
James RamosD
California State Assembly Member
Michelle Rodriguez
Michelle RodriguezD
California State Assembly Member
Juan Alanis
Juan AlanisR
California State Assembly Member
Patrick Ahrens
Patrick AhrensD
California State Assembly Member
70% progression
Bill has passed both houses in identical form and is being prepared for the Governor (9/12/2025)

Latest Voting History

September 12, 2025
PASS
Assembly Floor
Vote on Assembly Floor
AyesNoesNVRTotalResult
730780PASS

Key Takeaways

  • Requires POST to study and issue recommendations on police canines by 2028.
  • Directs the study to cover patrol use, detection, obedience standards, warnings, and review factors.
  • Repeals the requirement on July 1, 2031.
  • Declares no funding is requested and requires fiscal committee oversight.

Get Involved

Act Now!

Email the authors or create an email template to send to all relevant legislators.

Introduced By

Blanca Pacheco
Blanca PachecoD
California State Assembly Member
Co-Authors
James Ramos
James RamosD
California State Assembly Member
Michelle Rodriguez
Michelle RodriguezD
California State Assembly Member
Juan Alanis
Juan AlanisR
California State Assembly Member
Patrick Ahrens
Patrick AhrensD
California State Assembly Member

Summary

Assembly Member Pacheco guides a time-bound, study-focused measure that directs the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training to examine how police canines are used in law enforcement and to prepare recommendations for the Legislature.

The core directive establishes a temporary requirement for POST to study canine deployments and report back by mid-2028. The study must address: the community and law enforcement implications of canine use with an emphasis on safeguarding life, dignity, and liberty without prejudice; the fair and unbiased performance of duties by officers, including use of force involving canines; appropriate patrol applications with a canine (encompassing obedience, searches, apprehension, and handler protection); appropriate detection applications (including control, alert, and odor detection); factors for evaluating and reviewing all canine use-of-force incidents; and additional safety considerations such as warning protocols before releasing a canine within a deployment area. The reporting obligation references established Government Code processes, and the new provision contains a sunset repealing the requirement on a specified future date.

From a regulatory perspective, the measure does not itself alter existing canine deployment standards or penal statutes; rather, it creates a one-time, finite study obligation for POST and outlines the timetable for delivering recommendations to the Legislature. The fiscal note is open to oversight, as the measure does not include an explicit appropriation but requires review by the fiscal committee, with implementation anchored in POST’s duties within the Department of Justice and the existing Government Code framework governing reporting and sunset provisions. The sunset date ensures the provision expires unless renewed by subsequent legislation.

70% progression
Bill has passed both houses in identical form and is being prepared for the Governor (9/12/2025)

Key Dates

Vote on Assembly Floor
Assembly Floor
Vote on Assembly Floor
AB 400 Pacheco Concurrence in Senate Amendments
Vote on Senate Floor
Senate Floor
Vote on Senate Floor
Special Consent AB400 Pacheco et al. By Rubio
Senate Appropriations Hearing
Senate Committee
Senate Appropriations Hearing
Do pass as amended
Senate Appropriations Hearing
Senate Committee
Senate Appropriations Hearing
Placed on suspense file
Senate Public Safety Hearing
Senate Committee
Senate Public Safety Hearing
Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]
Vote on Assembly Floor
Assembly Floor
Vote on Assembly Floor
AB 400 Pacheco Assembly Third Reading
Assembly Appropriations Hearing
Assembly Committee
Assembly Appropriations Hearing
Do pass
Assembly Public Safety Hearing
Assembly Committee
Assembly Public Safety Hearing
Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]
Introduced
Assembly Floor
Introduced
Read first time. To print.

Latest Voting History

September 12, 2025
PASS
Assembly Floor
Vote on Assembly Floor
AyesNoesNVRTotalResult
730780PASS

Contacts

Profile
James RamosD
Assemblymember
Bill Author
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Juan AlanisR
Assemblymember
Bill Author
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Blanca PachecoD
Assemblymember
Bill Author
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Patrick AhrensD
Assemblymember
Bill Author
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Michelle RodriguezD
Assemblymember
Bill Author
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
0 of 5 row(s) selected.
Page 1 of 1
Select All Legislators
Profile
James RamosD
Assemblymember
Bill Author
Profile
Juan AlanisR
Assemblymember
Bill Author
Profile
Blanca PachecoD
Assemblymember
Bill Author
Profile
Patrick AhrensD
Assemblymember
Bill Author
Profile
Michelle RodriguezD
Assemblymember
Bill Author

Similar Past Legislation

Bill NumberTitleIntroduced DateStatusLink to Bill
AB-3241
Law enforcement: police canines.
February 2024
Failed
AB-2042
Police canines: guidelines.
February 2024
Failed
Showing 2 of 2 items
Page 1 of 1