veeto
Home
Bills
Feedback
hamburger
    Privacy PolicyResources
    © 2025 Veeto.
    AB-400
    Justice & Public Safety

    Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training: police canines.

    Enrolled
    CA
    ∙
    2025-2026 Regular Session
    0
    0
    Track
    Track

    Key Takeaways

    • Requires POST to study and issue recommendations on police canines by 2028.
    • Directs the study to cover patrol use, detection, obedience standards, warnings, and review factors.
    • Repeals the requirement on July 1, 2031.
    • Declares no funding is requested and requires fiscal committee oversight.

    Summary

    Assembly Member Pacheco guides a time-bound, study-focused measure that directs the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training to examine how police canines are used in law enforcement and to prepare recommendations for the Legislature.

    The core directive establishes a temporary requirement for POST to study canine deployments and report back by mid-2028. The study must address: the community and law enforcement implications of canine use with an emphasis on safeguarding life, dignity, and liberty without prejudice; the fair and unbiased performance of duties by officers, including use of force involving canines; appropriate patrol applications with a canine (encompassing obedience, searches, apprehension, and handler protection); appropriate detection applications (including control, alert, and odor detection); factors for evaluating and reviewing all canine use-of-force incidents; and additional safety considerations such as warning protocols before releasing a canine within a deployment area. The reporting obligation references established Government Code processes, and the new provision contains a sunset repealing the requirement on a specified future date.

    From a regulatory perspective, the measure does not itself alter existing canine deployment standards or penal statutes; rather, it creates a one-time, finite study obligation for POST and outlines the timetable for delivering recommendations to the Legislature. The fiscal note is open to oversight, as the measure does not include an explicit appropriation but requires review by the fiscal committee, with implementation anchored in POST’s duties within the Department of Justice and the existing Government Code framework governing reporting and sunset provisions. The sunset date ensures the provision expires unless renewed by subsequent legislation.

    Key Dates

    Vote on Assembly Floor
    Assembly Floor
    Vote on Assembly Floor
    AB 400 Pacheco Concurrence in Senate Amendments
    Vote on Senate Floor
    Senate Floor
    Vote on Senate Floor
    Special Consent AB400 Pacheco et al. By Rubio
    Senate Appropriations Hearing
    Senate Committee
    Senate Appropriations Hearing
    Do pass as amended
    Senate Appropriations Hearing
    Senate Committee
    Senate Appropriations Hearing
    Placed on suspense file
    Senate Public Safety Hearing
    Senate Committee
    Senate Public Safety Hearing
    Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]
    Vote on Assembly Floor
    Assembly Floor
    Vote on Assembly Floor
    AB 400 Pacheco Assembly Third Reading
    Assembly Appropriations Hearing
    Assembly Committee
    Assembly Appropriations Hearing
    Do pass
    Assembly Public Safety Hearing
    Assembly Committee
    Assembly Public Safety Hearing
    Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]
    Introduced
    Assembly Floor
    Introduced
    Read first time. To print.

    Contacts

    Profile
    James RamosD
    Assemblymember
    Bill Author
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    Profile
    Juan AlanisR
    Assemblymember
    Bill Author
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    Profile
    Blanca PachecoD
    Assemblymember
    Bill Author
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    Profile
    Patrick AhrensD
    Assemblymember
    Bill Author
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    Profile
    Michelle RodriguezD
    Assemblymember
    Bill Author
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    0 of 5 row(s) selected.
    Page 1 of 1
    Select All Legislators
    Profile
    James RamosD
    Assemblymember
    Bill Author
    Profile
    Juan AlanisR
    Assemblymember
    Bill Author
    Profile
    Blanca PachecoD
    Assemblymember
    Bill Author
    Profile
    Patrick AhrensD
    Assemblymember
    Bill Author
    Profile
    Michelle RodriguezD
    Assemblymember
    Bill Author

    Similar Past Legislation

    Bill NumberTitleIntroduced DateStatusLink to Bill
    AB-3241
    Law enforcement: police canines.
    February 2024
    Failed
    View Bill
    AB-2042
    Police canines: guidelines.
    February 2024
    Failed
    View Bill
    Showing 2 of 2 items
    Page 1 of 1

    Get Involved

    Act Now!

    Email the authors or create an email template to send to all relevant legislators.

    Introduced By

    Blanca Pacheco
    Blanca PachecoD
    California State Assembly Member
    Co-Authors
    James Ramos
    James RamosD
    California State Assembly Member
    Michelle Rodriguez
    Michelle RodriguezD
    California State Assembly Member
    Juan Alanis
    Juan AlanisR
    California State Assembly Member
    Patrick Ahrens
    Patrick AhrensD
    California State Assembly Member
    70% progression
    Bill has passed both houses in identical form and is being prepared for the Governor (9/12/2025)

    Latest Voting History

    View History
    September 12, 2025
    PASS
    Assembly Floor
    Vote on Assembly Floor
    AyesNoesNVRTotalResult
    730780PASS

    Key Takeaways

    • Requires POST to study and issue recommendations on police canines by 2028.
    • Directs the study to cover patrol use, detection, obedience standards, warnings, and review factors.
    • Repeals the requirement on July 1, 2031.
    • Declares no funding is requested and requires fiscal committee oversight.

    Get Involved

    Act Now!

    Email the authors or create an email template to send to all relevant legislators.

    Introduced By

    Blanca Pacheco
    Blanca PachecoD
    California State Assembly Member
    Co-Authors
    James Ramos
    James RamosD
    California State Assembly Member
    Michelle Rodriguez
    Michelle RodriguezD
    California State Assembly Member
    Juan Alanis
    Juan AlanisR
    California State Assembly Member
    Patrick Ahrens
    Patrick AhrensD
    California State Assembly Member

    Summary

    Assembly Member Pacheco guides a time-bound, study-focused measure that directs the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training to examine how police canines are used in law enforcement and to prepare recommendations for the Legislature.

    The core directive establishes a temporary requirement for POST to study canine deployments and report back by mid-2028. The study must address: the community and law enforcement implications of canine use with an emphasis on safeguarding life, dignity, and liberty without prejudice; the fair and unbiased performance of duties by officers, including use of force involving canines; appropriate patrol applications with a canine (encompassing obedience, searches, apprehension, and handler protection); appropriate detection applications (including control, alert, and odor detection); factors for evaluating and reviewing all canine use-of-force incidents; and additional safety considerations such as warning protocols before releasing a canine within a deployment area. The reporting obligation references established Government Code processes, and the new provision contains a sunset repealing the requirement on a specified future date.

    From a regulatory perspective, the measure does not itself alter existing canine deployment standards or penal statutes; rather, it creates a one-time, finite study obligation for POST and outlines the timetable for delivering recommendations to the Legislature. The fiscal note is open to oversight, as the measure does not include an explicit appropriation but requires review by the fiscal committee, with implementation anchored in POST’s duties within the Department of Justice and the existing Government Code framework governing reporting and sunset provisions. The sunset date ensures the provision expires unless renewed by subsequent legislation.

    70% progression
    Bill has passed both houses in identical form and is being prepared for the Governor (9/12/2025)

    Key Dates

    Vote on Assembly Floor
    Assembly Floor
    Vote on Assembly Floor
    AB 400 Pacheco Concurrence in Senate Amendments
    Vote on Senate Floor
    Senate Floor
    Vote on Senate Floor
    Special Consent AB400 Pacheco et al. By Rubio
    Senate Appropriations Hearing
    Senate Committee
    Senate Appropriations Hearing
    Do pass as amended
    Senate Appropriations Hearing
    Senate Committee
    Senate Appropriations Hearing
    Placed on suspense file
    Senate Public Safety Hearing
    Senate Committee
    Senate Public Safety Hearing
    Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]
    Vote on Assembly Floor
    Assembly Floor
    Vote on Assembly Floor
    AB 400 Pacheco Assembly Third Reading
    Assembly Appropriations Hearing
    Assembly Committee
    Assembly Appropriations Hearing
    Do pass
    Assembly Public Safety Hearing
    Assembly Committee
    Assembly Public Safety Hearing
    Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]
    Introduced
    Assembly Floor
    Introduced
    Read first time. To print.

    Latest Voting History

    View History
    September 12, 2025
    PASS
    Assembly Floor
    Vote on Assembly Floor
    AyesNoesNVRTotalResult
    730780PASS

    Contacts

    Profile
    James RamosD
    Assemblymember
    Bill Author
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    Profile
    Juan AlanisR
    Assemblymember
    Bill Author
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    Profile
    Blanca PachecoD
    Assemblymember
    Bill Author
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    Profile
    Patrick AhrensD
    Assemblymember
    Bill Author
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    Profile
    Michelle RodriguezD
    Assemblymember
    Bill Author
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    0 of 5 row(s) selected.
    Page 1 of 1
    Select All Legislators
    Profile
    James RamosD
    Assemblymember
    Bill Author
    Profile
    Juan AlanisR
    Assemblymember
    Bill Author
    Profile
    Blanca PachecoD
    Assemblymember
    Bill Author
    Profile
    Patrick AhrensD
    Assemblymember
    Bill Author
    Profile
    Michelle RodriguezD
    Assemblymember
    Bill Author

    Similar Past Legislation

    Bill NumberTitleIntroduced DateStatusLink to Bill
    AB-3241
    Law enforcement: police canines.
    February 2024
    Failed
    View Bill
    AB-2042
    Police canines: guidelines.
    February 2024
    Failed
    View Bill
    Showing 2 of 2 items
    Page 1 of 1