veeto
Home
Bills
Feedback
hamburger
    Privacy PolicyResources
    © 2025 Veeto.
    SB-295
    Consumer Protection

    California Preventing Algorithmic Collusion Act of 2025.

    Engrossed
    CA
    ∙
    2025-2026 Regular Session
    0
    0
    Track
    Track

    Key Takeaways

    • Prohibits businesses from using pricing algorithms that process competitor data to coordinate prices in the same market.
    • Authorizes state officials to pursue civil penalties up to $25,000 per violation plus restitution and damages.
    • Requires companies to perform due diligence before using pricing algorithm recommendations to avoid penalties.
    • Exempts credit scoring tools and data collected more than one year ago from these restrictions.

    Summary

    Senator Hurtado's California Preventing Algorithmic Collusion Act establishes new regulations governing the use of pricing algorithms that process confidential competitor data, aiming to prevent implicit price coordination among market competitors. The legislation prohibits distributing pricing algorithms or their recommendations to multiple competitors when those algorithms process confidential market data, and bars companies from using such algorithmic recommendations if they know a competitor employs the same system.

    The act creates an affirmative defense for companies that conduct documented due diligence before implementing algorithmic pricing recommendations, such as obtaining written assurances that the systems do not incorporate competitor data. Violations accrue separately for each authorized algorithm user, each recommendation instance, and each month of continued use. The provisions exempt cases where all processed competitor data is more than one year old, as well as credit scoring tools subject to federal reporting laws.

    Enforcement authority rests with the Attorney General, district attorneys, county counsels, and city attorneys, who may pursue civil actions seeking restitution, punitive damages, and penalties up to $25,000 per violation. Courts determining penalties must weigh factors including violation severity, persistence, willfulness, and the defendant's cooperation and financial circumstances. The act operates alongside existing antitrust statutes while establishing distinct oversight of algorithmic pricing practices that could enable tacit collusion through automated systems.

    Key Dates

    Vote on Assembly Floor
    Assembly Floor
    Vote on Assembly Floor
    SB 295 Hurtado Senate Third Reading By Bauer-Kahan
    Assembly Appropriations Hearing
    Assembly Committee
    Assembly Appropriations Hearing
    Do pass as amended
    Assembly Privacy And Consumer Protection Hearing
    Assembly Committee
    Assembly Privacy And Consumer Protection Hearing
    Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]
    Assembly Judiciary Hearing
    Assembly Committee
    Assembly Judiciary Hearing
    Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Privacy and Consumer Protection]
    Assembly Judiciary Hearing
    Assembly Committee
    Assembly Judiciary Hearing
    Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Privacy and Consumer Protection]
    Vote on Senate Floor
    Senate Floor
    Vote on Senate Floor
    Senate 3rd Reading SB295 Hurtado et al
    Senate Appropriations Hearing
    Senate Committee
    Senate Appropriations Hearing
    Do pass
    Senate Appropriations Hearing
    Senate Committee
    Senate Appropriations Hearing
    Placed on suspense file
    Senate Judiciary Hearing
    Senate Committee
    Senate Judiciary Hearing
    Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to the Committee on [Public Safety]
    Introduced
    Senate Floor
    Introduced
    Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

    Contacts

    Profile
    Melissa HurtadoD
    Senator
    Bill Author
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    Profile
    Dave CorteseD
    Senator
    Bill Author
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    0 of 2 row(s) selected.
    Page 1 of 1
    Select All Legislators
    Profile
    Melissa HurtadoD
    Senator
    Bill Author
    Profile
    Dave CorteseD
    Senator
    Bill Author

    Get Involved

    Act Now!

    Email the authors or create an email template to send to all relevant legislators.

    Introduced By

    Melissa Hurtado
    Melissa HurtadoD
    California State Senator
    Co-Author
    Dave Cortese
    Dave CorteseD
    California State Senator
    40% progression
    Bill has passed all readings in its first house and is ready to move to the other house (6/3/2025)

    Latest Voting History

    View History
    September 13, 2025
    FAIL
    Assembly Floor
    Vote on Assembly Floor
    AyesNoesNVRTotalResult
    13244380FAIL

    Key Takeaways

    • Prohibits businesses from using pricing algorithms that process competitor data to coordinate prices in the same market.
    • Authorizes state officials to pursue civil penalties up to $25,000 per violation plus restitution and damages.
    • Requires companies to perform due diligence before using pricing algorithm recommendations to avoid penalties.
    • Exempts credit scoring tools and data collected more than one year ago from these restrictions.

    Get Involved

    Act Now!

    Email the authors or create an email template to send to all relevant legislators.

    Introduced By

    Melissa Hurtado
    Melissa HurtadoD
    California State Senator
    Co-Author
    Dave Cortese
    Dave CorteseD
    California State Senator

    Summary

    Senator Hurtado's California Preventing Algorithmic Collusion Act establishes new regulations governing the use of pricing algorithms that process confidential competitor data, aiming to prevent implicit price coordination among market competitors. The legislation prohibits distributing pricing algorithms or their recommendations to multiple competitors when those algorithms process confidential market data, and bars companies from using such algorithmic recommendations if they know a competitor employs the same system.

    The act creates an affirmative defense for companies that conduct documented due diligence before implementing algorithmic pricing recommendations, such as obtaining written assurances that the systems do not incorporate competitor data. Violations accrue separately for each authorized algorithm user, each recommendation instance, and each month of continued use. The provisions exempt cases where all processed competitor data is more than one year old, as well as credit scoring tools subject to federal reporting laws.

    Enforcement authority rests with the Attorney General, district attorneys, county counsels, and city attorneys, who may pursue civil actions seeking restitution, punitive damages, and penalties up to $25,000 per violation. Courts determining penalties must weigh factors including violation severity, persistence, willfulness, and the defendant's cooperation and financial circumstances. The act operates alongside existing antitrust statutes while establishing distinct oversight of algorithmic pricing practices that could enable tacit collusion through automated systems.

    40% progression
    Bill has passed all readings in its first house and is ready to move to the other house (6/3/2025)

    Key Dates

    Vote on Assembly Floor
    Assembly Floor
    Vote on Assembly Floor
    SB 295 Hurtado Senate Third Reading By Bauer-Kahan
    Assembly Appropriations Hearing
    Assembly Committee
    Assembly Appropriations Hearing
    Do pass as amended
    Assembly Privacy And Consumer Protection Hearing
    Assembly Committee
    Assembly Privacy And Consumer Protection Hearing
    Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]
    Assembly Judiciary Hearing
    Assembly Committee
    Assembly Judiciary Hearing
    Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Privacy and Consumer Protection]
    Assembly Judiciary Hearing
    Assembly Committee
    Assembly Judiciary Hearing
    Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Privacy and Consumer Protection]
    Vote on Senate Floor
    Senate Floor
    Vote on Senate Floor
    Senate 3rd Reading SB295 Hurtado et al
    Senate Appropriations Hearing
    Senate Committee
    Senate Appropriations Hearing
    Do pass
    Senate Appropriations Hearing
    Senate Committee
    Senate Appropriations Hearing
    Placed on suspense file
    Senate Judiciary Hearing
    Senate Committee
    Senate Judiciary Hearing
    Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to the Committee on [Public Safety]
    Introduced
    Senate Floor
    Introduced
    Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

    Latest Voting History

    View History
    September 13, 2025
    FAIL
    Assembly Floor
    Vote on Assembly Floor
    AyesNoesNVRTotalResult
    13244380FAIL

    Contacts

    Profile
    Melissa HurtadoD
    Senator
    Bill Author
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    Profile
    Dave CorteseD
    Senator
    Bill Author
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    0 of 2 row(s) selected.
    Page 1 of 1
    Select All Legislators
    Profile
    Melissa HurtadoD
    Senator
    Bill Author
    Profile
    Dave CorteseD
    Senator
    Bill Author