veeto
Home
Bills
Influence
Feedback
hamburger
    Privacy PolicyResources
    © 2025 Veeto.
    AB-561
    Justice & Public Safety

    Restraining orders.

    Engrossed
    CA
    ∙
    2025-2026 Regular Session
    0
    0
    Track
    Track

    Key Takeaways

    • Requires courts to accept electronic filings for all restraining orders at no cost to petitioners.
    • Allows parties and witnesses to appear remotely at restraining order hearings without fees.
    • Mandates courts to display electronic filing information and self-help resources prominently online.
    • Permits alternative service methods when respondents cannot be personally served after diligent efforts.

    Summary

    Assembly Member Quirk-Silva's legislation modernizes California's restraining order system by mandating electronic filing options and expanding remote court access. The bill requires courts to accept restraining order petitions electronically at no cost to petitioners, while allowing parties, support persons, and witnesses to appear remotely at hearings without fees. Courts must develop and post local rules for remote appearances on their websites.

    The legislation applies these changes across multiple types of protective orders, including those for civil harassment, domestic violence, and elder/dependent adult abuse. For domestic violence cases specifically, courts must prominently display electronic filing information and self-help resources on their homepages. The bill also maintains existing fee waivers for restraining orders based on stalking or credible threats of violence.

    To enhance enforcement, the bill authorizes courts to permit alternative service methods when traditional personal service proves unsuccessful due to evasion or inability to locate the respondent. Law enforcement officers who determine a protective order exists but hasn't been served can provide verbal notice to respondents, which constitutes legal service. The legislation preserves current penalties for violating restraining orders and restrictions on firearm possession by restrained parties.

    For elder and dependent adult protective orders, the bill requires courts to assist petitioners who wish to participate in hearings, whether in person or remotely. Adult protective services agencies must take reasonable steps to ensure the safety of protected individuals, including helping locate alternative accommodations when needed.

    Key Dates

    Next Step
    Referred to the Senate Standing Committee on Appropriations
    Next Step
    Senate Committee
    Referred to the Senate Standing Committee on Appropriations
    Hearing scheduled for , 1021 O Street, Room 2200
    Senate Judiciary Hearing
    Senate Committee
    Senate Judiciary Hearing
    Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to the Committee on [Appropriations] with the recommendation: To Consent Calendar
    Vote on Assembly Floor
    Assembly Floor
    Vote on Assembly Floor
    AB 561 Quirk-Silva Assembly Third Reading
    Assembly Appropriations Hearing
    Assembly Committee
    Assembly Appropriations Hearing
    Do pass
    Assembly Judiciary Hearing
    Assembly Committee
    Assembly Judiciary Hearing
    Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations] with recommendation: To Consent Calendar
    Introduced
    Assembly Floor
    Introduced
    Read first time. To print.

    Contacts

    Profile
    Anna CaballeroD
    Senator
    Committee Member
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    Profile
    Sharon Quirk-SilvaD
    Assemblymember
    Bill Author
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    Profile
    Tim GraysonD
    Senator
    Committee Member
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    Profile
    Megan DahleR
    Senator
    Committee Member
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    Profile
    Kelly SeyartoR
    Senator
    Committee Member
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    0 of 8 row(s) selected.
    Page 1 of 2
    Select All Legislators
    Profile
    Anna CaballeroD
    Senator
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Sharon Quirk-SilvaD
    Assemblymember
    Bill Author
    Profile
    Tim GraysonD
    Senator
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Megan DahleR
    Senator
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Kelly SeyartoR
    Senator
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Aisha WahabD
    Senator
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Christopher CabaldonD
    Senator
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Laura RichardsonD
    Senator
    Committee Member

    Get Involved

    Act Now!

    Email the authors or create an email template to send to all relevant legislators.

    Introduced By

    Sharon Quirk-Silva
    Sharon Quirk-SilvaD
    California State Assembly Member
    40% progression
    Bill has passed all readings in its first house and is ready to move to the other house (6/2/2025)

    Latest Voting History

    View History
    July 8, 2025
    PASS
    Senate Committee
    Senate Judiciary Hearing
    AyesNoesNVRTotalResult
    130013PASS

    Key Takeaways

    • Requires courts to accept electronic filings for all restraining orders at no cost to petitioners.
    • Allows parties and witnesses to appear remotely at restraining order hearings without fees.
    • Mandates courts to display electronic filing information and self-help resources prominently online.
    • Permits alternative service methods when respondents cannot be personally served after diligent efforts.

    Get Involved

    Act Now!

    Email the authors or create an email template to send to all relevant legislators.

    Introduced By

    Sharon Quirk-Silva
    Sharon Quirk-SilvaD
    California State Assembly Member

    Summary

    Assembly Member Quirk-Silva's legislation modernizes California's restraining order system by mandating electronic filing options and expanding remote court access. The bill requires courts to accept restraining order petitions electronically at no cost to petitioners, while allowing parties, support persons, and witnesses to appear remotely at hearings without fees. Courts must develop and post local rules for remote appearances on their websites.

    The legislation applies these changes across multiple types of protective orders, including those for civil harassment, domestic violence, and elder/dependent adult abuse. For domestic violence cases specifically, courts must prominently display electronic filing information and self-help resources on their homepages. The bill also maintains existing fee waivers for restraining orders based on stalking or credible threats of violence.

    To enhance enforcement, the bill authorizes courts to permit alternative service methods when traditional personal service proves unsuccessful due to evasion or inability to locate the respondent. Law enforcement officers who determine a protective order exists but hasn't been served can provide verbal notice to respondents, which constitutes legal service. The legislation preserves current penalties for violating restraining orders and restrictions on firearm possession by restrained parties.

    For elder and dependent adult protective orders, the bill requires courts to assist petitioners who wish to participate in hearings, whether in person or remotely. Adult protective services agencies must take reasonable steps to ensure the safety of protected individuals, including helping locate alternative accommodations when needed.

    40% progression
    Bill has passed all readings in its first house and is ready to move to the other house (6/2/2025)

    Key Dates

    Next Step
    Referred to the Senate Standing Committee on Appropriations
    Next Step
    Senate Committee
    Referred to the Senate Standing Committee on Appropriations
    Hearing scheduled for , 1021 O Street, Room 2200
    Senate Judiciary Hearing
    Senate Committee
    Senate Judiciary Hearing
    Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to the Committee on [Appropriations] with the recommendation: To Consent Calendar
    Vote on Assembly Floor
    Assembly Floor
    Vote on Assembly Floor
    AB 561 Quirk-Silva Assembly Third Reading
    Assembly Appropriations Hearing
    Assembly Committee
    Assembly Appropriations Hearing
    Do pass
    Assembly Judiciary Hearing
    Assembly Committee
    Assembly Judiciary Hearing
    Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations] with recommendation: To Consent Calendar
    Introduced
    Assembly Floor
    Introduced
    Read first time. To print.

    Latest Voting History

    View History
    July 8, 2025
    PASS
    Senate Committee
    Senate Judiciary Hearing
    AyesNoesNVRTotalResult
    130013PASS

    Contacts

    Profile
    Anna CaballeroD
    Senator
    Committee Member
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    Profile
    Sharon Quirk-SilvaD
    Assemblymember
    Bill Author
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    Profile
    Tim GraysonD
    Senator
    Committee Member
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    Profile
    Megan DahleR
    Senator
    Committee Member
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    Profile
    Kelly SeyartoR
    Senator
    Committee Member
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    0 of 8 row(s) selected.
    Page 1 of 2
    Select All Legislators
    Profile
    Anna CaballeroD
    Senator
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Sharon Quirk-SilvaD
    Assemblymember
    Bill Author
    Profile
    Tim GraysonD
    Senator
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Megan DahleR
    Senator
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Kelly SeyartoR
    Senator
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Aisha WahabD
    Senator
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Christopher CabaldonD
    Senator
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Laura RichardsonD
    Senator
    Committee Member