Senator Becker, with coauthor Senator Rubio, advances a rural health access initiative that would create a new division to pilot Virtual Health Hubs for farmworkers in California's rural communities, deploying telemedicine-enabled facilities to connect residents with health care, mental health services, and educational programming. The core objective centers on expanding access by establishing two virtual health hubs in two rural communities, funded entirely with non-General Fund resources and subject to a minimum fund balance of two million dollars, with a sunset if that balance is not achieved by 2030.
Key mechanisms establish the program’s structure and governance. A Virtual Health Hub is defined as a vehicle or portable facility equipped with computers, Wi‑Fi, cubicles for virtual visits, and exam rooms for telemedicine. The State Department of Public Health administers a fund created to expand access to health services for farmworkers by providing virtual connections, and it awards grants to partnerships of two separate community-based organizations to establish and deploy the hubs, though a single organization may receive both components if necessary for effectiveness, efficiency, or coverage. Hubs must be deployed in two rural communities based on farmworker population and current access to care, and grant recipients must provide space around the hubs for visiting professionals and on-site programming. Implementation requires no General Fund money, a funded balance of at least two million dollars, and a posted notice confirming that balance has been met.
Grant evaluation and data reporting are guided by explicit criteria and transparency measures. The department may apply a weighted scoring system to grant proposals and must publish the application rubric and review process to ensure transparent funding decisions. Priority criteria include mental health support, cultural and linguistic alignment, a history of serving medically underserved communities, existing or planned telehealth infrastructure, and the ability to collect and report deidentified aggregate data on demographics, service types, and barriers to care. Grant recipients must report information to the department upon request and in the manner prescribed, with data handling limited to deidentified, aggregate information to protect privacy, consistent with HIPAA and CMIA requirements. The department must post final program reports on its website and comply with applicable government reporting standards.
The program’s funding and sunset provisions set a distinct implementation timeline and oversight framework. The fund will be administered with non-General Fund resources, and the division becomes inoperative if the fund balance is not met by December 31, 2030, unless extended by future legislation. Two years after the fund balance notice is posted, the department must submit a program report to the Legislature detailing information provided by grantees, including age ranges, income brackets, race/ethnicity where available, primary language, geographic area served, insurance status, number served, types of health services accessed, and general barriers to care. The department will post the final report publicly and ensure compliance with governing privacy laws.
Context for this proposal rests on prior efforts to improve farmworker health access, including a notable express bus program and partnerships with community organizations and well-known donors. The bill’s findings describe the historical contributions of groups such as ALAS and Life Science Cares Bay Area, and references health disparities faced by Latino communities, including higher rates of diabetes, hypertension, and COVID-19 impacts, to justify the approach. The initiative emphasizes culturally and linguistically appropriate service delivery, collaboration with local health providers, and data-driven evaluation to inform ongoing policy discussions, while remaining subject to the availability of non-General Fund funding and the sunset mechanism that ties program continuity to fundraising milestones.
![]() Susan RubioD Senator | Bill Author | Not Contacted | |
![]() Josh BeckerD Senator | Bill Author | Not Contacted |
Email the authors or create an email template to send to all relevant legislators.
Senator Becker, with coauthor Senator Rubio, advances a rural health access initiative that would create a new division to pilot Virtual Health Hubs for farmworkers in California's rural communities, deploying telemedicine-enabled facilities to connect residents with health care, mental health services, and educational programming. The core objective centers on expanding access by establishing two virtual health hubs in two rural communities, funded entirely with non-General Fund resources and subject to a minimum fund balance of two million dollars, with a sunset if that balance is not achieved by 2030.
Key mechanisms establish the program’s structure and governance. A Virtual Health Hub is defined as a vehicle or portable facility equipped with computers, Wi‑Fi, cubicles for virtual visits, and exam rooms for telemedicine. The State Department of Public Health administers a fund created to expand access to health services for farmworkers by providing virtual connections, and it awards grants to partnerships of two separate community-based organizations to establish and deploy the hubs, though a single organization may receive both components if necessary for effectiveness, efficiency, or coverage. Hubs must be deployed in two rural communities based on farmworker population and current access to care, and grant recipients must provide space around the hubs for visiting professionals and on-site programming. Implementation requires no General Fund money, a funded balance of at least two million dollars, and a posted notice confirming that balance has been met.
Grant evaluation and data reporting are guided by explicit criteria and transparency measures. The department may apply a weighted scoring system to grant proposals and must publish the application rubric and review process to ensure transparent funding decisions. Priority criteria include mental health support, cultural and linguistic alignment, a history of serving medically underserved communities, existing or planned telehealth infrastructure, and the ability to collect and report deidentified aggregate data on demographics, service types, and barriers to care. Grant recipients must report information to the department upon request and in the manner prescribed, with data handling limited to deidentified, aggregate information to protect privacy, consistent with HIPAA and CMIA requirements. The department must post final program reports on its website and comply with applicable government reporting standards.
The program’s funding and sunset provisions set a distinct implementation timeline and oversight framework. The fund will be administered with non-General Fund resources, and the division becomes inoperative if the fund balance is not met by December 31, 2030, unless extended by future legislation. Two years after the fund balance notice is posted, the department must submit a program report to the Legislature detailing information provided by grantees, including age ranges, income brackets, race/ethnicity where available, primary language, geographic area served, insurance status, number served, types of health services accessed, and general barriers to care. The department will post the final report publicly and ensure compliance with governing privacy laws.
Context for this proposal rests on prior efforts to improve farmworker health access, including a notable express bus program and partnerships with community organizations and well-known donors. The bill’s findings describe the historical contributions of groups such as ALAS and Life Science Cares Bay Area, and references health disparities faced by Latino communities, including higher rates of diabetes, hypertension, and COVID-19 impacts, to justify the approach. The initiative emphasizes culturally and linguistically appropriate service delivery, collaboration with local health providers, and data-driven evaluation to inform ongoing policy discussions, while remaining subject to the availability of non-General Fund funding and the sunset mechanism that ties program continuity to fundraising milestones.
Ayes | Noes | NVR | Total | Result |
---|---|---|---|---|
40 | 0 | 0 | 40 | PASS |
![]() Susan RubioD Senator | Bill Author | Not Contacted | |
![]() Josh BeckerD Senator | Bill Author | Not Contacted |