veeto
Home
Bills
Feedback
hamburger
    Privacy PolicyResources
    © 2025 Veeto.
    AB-603
    Justice & Public Safety

    Asset forfeiture: human trafficking.

    Introduced
    CA
    ∙
    2025-2026 Regular Session
    0
    0
    Track
    Track

    Key Takeaways

    • Expands asset forfeiture laws to seize property from human trafficking without proving a pattern of criminal activity.
    • Directs seized assets to fund victim services and law enforcement training for human trafficking cases.
    • Requires prosecutors to prove beyond reasonable doubt that property was gained through human trafficking.
    • Protects innocent property owners by exempting assets owned by legitimate purchasers from seizure.

    Summary

    Assembly Member Alanis proposes substantial changes to California's asset forfeiture framework for human trafficking cases through amendments to the California Control of Profits of Organized Crime Act. The legislation removes the requirement to establish a pattern of criminal profiteering activity before seizing assets linked to human trafficking, while maintaining existing forfeiture provisions for cases involving minors.

    The bill renames the law as the "California Control of Profits of Organized Crime and Human Trafficking Act" and modifies the distribution of forfeited assets. Under the new framework, proceeds from human trafficking forfeitures would be split equally between the Victim-Witness Assistance Fund and the Board of State and Community Corrections. The Victim-Witness portion would support community organizations serving human trafficking victims, while the Board's allocation would fund sexual assault response teams for law enforcement training, investigation expenses, and equipment purchases.

    The legislation preserves key procedural safeguards, including the requirement that prosecuting agencies prove beyond reasonable doubt that defendants engaged in human trafficking and that the property is subject to forfeiture. Property owners maintain the right to contest seizures within 30 days of notification, and the bill explicitly protects the interests of bona fide purchasers. The amendments also retain existing asset forfeiture provisions for human trafficking crimes involving commercial sexual exploitation of minors.

    Key Dates

    Next Step
    Referred to the Assembly Standing Committee on Public Safety
    Next Step
    Assembly Committee
    Referred to the Assembly Standing Committee on Public Safety
    Hearing has not been scheduled yet
    Introduced
    Assembly Floor
    Introduced
    Read first time. To print.

    Contacts

    Profile
    Tom LackeyR
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    Profile
    James RamosD
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    Profile
    Matt HaneyD
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    Profile
    Juan AlanisR
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    Profile
    Stephanie NguyenD
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    0 of 9 row(s) selected.
    Page 1 of 2
    Select All Legislators
    Profile
    Tom LackeyR
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Profile
    James RamosD
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Matt HaneyD
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Juan AlanisR
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Stephanie NguyenD
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Mark GonzalezD
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Profile
    John HarabedianD
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Nick SchultzD
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Profile
    LaShae Sharp-CollinsD
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member

    Get Involved

    Act Now!

    Email the authors or create an email template to send to all relevant legislators.

    Introduced By

    Juan Alanis
    Juan AlanisR
    California State Assembly Member
    10% progression
    Bill has been formally introduced and read for the first time in its house of origin (2/13/2025)

    Key Takeaways

    • Expands asset forfeiture laws to seize property from human trafficking without proving a pattern of criminal activity.
    • Directs seized assets to fund victim services and law enforcement training for human trafficking cases.
    • Requires prosecutors to prove beyond reasonable doubt that property was gained through human trafficking.
    • Protects innocent property owners by exempting assets owned by legitimate purchasers from seizure.

    Get Involved

    Act Now!

    Email the authors or create an email template to send to all relevant legislators.

    Introduced By

    Juan Alanis
    Juan AlanisR
    California State Assembly Member

    Summary

    Assembly Member Alanis proposes substantial changes to California's asset forfeiture framework for human trafficking cases through amendments to the California Control of Profits of Organized Crime Act. The legislation removes the requirement to establish a pattern of criminal profiteering activity before seizing assets linked to human trafficking, while maintaining existing forfeiture provisions for cases involving minors.

    The bill renames the law as the "California Control of Profits of Organized Crime and Human Trafficking Act" and modifies the distribution of forfeited assets. Under the new framework, proceeds from human trafficking forfeitures would be split equally between the Victim-Witness Assistance Fund and the Board of State and Community Corrections. The Victim-Witness portion would support community organizations serving human trafficking victims, while the Board's allocation would fund sexual assault response teams for law enforcement training, investigation expenses, and equipment purchases.

    The legislation preserves key procedural safeguards, including the requirement that prosecuting agencies prove beyond reasonable doubt that defendants engaged in human trafficking and that the property is subject to forfeiture. Property owners maintain the right to contest seizures within 30 days of notification, and the bill explicitly protects the interests of bona fide purchasers. The amendments also retain existing asset forfeiture provisions for human trafficking crimes involving commercial sexual exploitation of minors.

    10% progression
    Bill has been formally introduced and read for the first time in its house of origin (2/13/2025)

    Key Dates

    Next Step
    Referred to the Assembly Standing Committee on Public Safety
    Next Step
    Assembly Committee
    Referred to the Assembly Standing Committee on Public Safety
    Hearing has not been scheduled yet
    Introduced
    Assembly Floor
    Introduced
    Read first time. To print.

    Contacts

    Profile
    Tom LackeyR
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    Profile
    James RamosD
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    Profile
    Matt HaneyD
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    Profile
    Juan AlanisR
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    Profile
    Stephanie NguyenD
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    0 of 9 row(s) selected.
    Page 1 of 2
    Select All Legislators
    Profile
    Tom LackeyR
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Profile
    James RamosD
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Matt HaneyD
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Juan AlanisR
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Stephanie NguyenD
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Mark GonzalezD
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Profile
    John HarabedianD
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Nick SchultzD
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Profile
    LaShae Sharp-CollinsD
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member