AB-603
Justice & Public Safety

Asset forfeiture: human trafficking.

Introduced
CA
2025-2026 Regular Session
0
0
Track

Key Takeaways

  • Expands asset forfeiture laws to seize property from human trafficking without proving a pattern of criminal activity.
  • Directs seized assets to fund victim services and law enforcement training for human trafficking cases.
  • Requires prosecutors to prove beyond reasonable doubt that property was gained through human trafficking.
  • Protects innocent property owners by exempting assets owned by legitimate purchasers from seizure.

Summary

Assembly Member Alanis proposes substantial changes to California's asset forfeiture framework for human trafficking cases through amendments to the California Control of Profits of Organized Crime Act. The legislation removes the requirement to establish a pattern of criminal profiteering activity before seizing assets linked to human trafficking, while maintaining existing forfeiture provisions for cases involving minors.

The bill renames the law as the "California Control of Profits of Organized Crime and Human Trafficking Act" and modifies the distribution of forfeited assets. Under the new framework, proceeds from human trafficking forfeitures would be split equally between the Victim-Witness Assistance Fund and the Board of State and Community Corrections. The Victim-Witness portion would support community organizations serving human trafficking victims, while the Board's allocation would fund sexual assault response teams for law enforcement training, investigation expenses, and equipment purchases.

The legislation preserves key procedural safeguards, including the requirement that prosecuting agencies prove beyond reasonable doubt that defendants engaged in human trafficking and that the property is subject to forfeiture. Property owners maintain the right to contest seizures within 30 days of notification, and the bill explicitly protects the interests of bona fide purchasers. The amendments also retain existing asset forfeiture provisions for human trafficking crimes involving commercial sexual exploitation of minors.

Key Dates

Next Step
Referred to the Assembly Standing Committee on Public Safety
Next Step
Assembly Committee
Referred to the Assembly Standing Committee on Public Safety
Hearing has not been scheduled yet
Read first time. To print.
Assembly Floor
Read first time. To print.
Read first time. To print.

Contacts

Profile
Tom LackeyR
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
James RamosD
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Matt HaneyD
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Juan AlanisR
Assemblymember
Bill Author
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Stephanie NguyenD
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
0 of 9 row(s) selected.
Page 1 of 2
Select All Legislators
Profile
Tom LackeyR
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Profile
James RamosD
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Profile
Matt HaneyD
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Profile
Juan AlanisR
Assemblymember
Bill Author
Profile
Stephanie NguyenD
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Profile
Mark GonzalezD
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Profile
John HarabedianD
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Profile
Nick SchultzD
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Profile
LaShae Sharp-CollinsD
Assemblymember
Committee Member

Get Involved

Act Now!

Email the authors or create an email template to send to all relevant legislators.

Introduced By

Juan Alanis
Juan AlanisR
California State Assembly Member
10% progression
Bill has been formally introduced and read for the first time in its house of origin (2/13/2025)

Key Takeaways

  • Expands asset forfeiture laws to seize property from human trafficking without proving a pattern of criminal activity.
  • Directs seized assets to fund victim services and law enforcement training for human trafficking cases.
  • Requires prosecutors to prove beyond reasonable doubt that property was gained through human trafficking.
  • Protects innocent property owners by exempting assets owned by legitimate purchasers from seizure.

Get Involved

Act Now!

Email the authors or create an email template to send to all relevant legislators.

Introduced By

Juan Alanis
Juan AlanisR
California State Assembly Member

Summary

Assembly Member Alanis proposes substantial changes to California's asset forfeiture framework for human trafficking cases through amendments to the California Control of Profits of Organized Crime Act. The legislation removes the requirement to establish a pattern of criminal profiteering activity before seizing assets linked to human trafficking, while maintaining existing forfeiture provisions for cases involving minors.

The bill renames the law as the "California Control of Profits of Organized Crime and Human Trafficking Act" and modifies the distribution of forfeited assets. Under the new framework, proceeds from human trafficking forfeitures would be split equally between the Victim-Witness Assistance Fund and the Board of State and Community Corrections. The Victim-Witness portion would support community organizations serving human trafficking victims, while the Board's allocation would fund sexual assault response teams for law enforcement training, investigation expenses, and equipment purchases.

The legislation preserves key procedural safeguards, including the requirement that prosecuting agencies prove beyond reasonable doubt that defendants engaged in human trafficking and that the property is subject to forfeiture. Property owners maintain the right to contest seizures within 30 days of notification, and the bill explicitly protects the interests of bona fide purchasers. The amendments also retain existing asset forfeiture provisions for human trafficking crimes involving commercial sexual exploitation of minors.

10% progression
Bill has been formally introduced and read for the first time in its house of origin (2/13/2025)

Key Dates

Next Step
Referred to the Assembly Standing Committee on Public Safety
Next Step
Assembly Committee
Referred to the Assembly Standing Committee on Public Safety
Hearing has not been scheduled yet
Read first time. To print.
Assembly Floor
Read first time. To print.
Read first time. To print.

Contacts

Profile
Tom LackeyR
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
James RamosD
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Matt HaneyD
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Juan AlanisR
Assemblymember
Bill Author
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Stephanie NguyenD
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
0 of 9 row(s) selected.
Page 1 of 2
Select All Legislators
Profile
Tom LackeyR
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Profile
James RamosD
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Profile
Matt HaneyD
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Profile
Juan AlanisR
Assemblymember
Bill Author
Profile
Stephanie NguyenD
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Profile
Mark GonzalezD
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Profile
John HarabedianD
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Profile
Nick SchultzD
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Profile
LaShae Sharp-CollinsD
Assemblymember
Committee Member