AB-603
Justice & Public Safety

Asset forfeiture: human trafficking.

Introduced
CA
2025-2026 Regular Session
0
0
0
Track

Key Takeaways

  • Expands asset forfeiture laws to seize property from human trafficking without proving a pattern of criminal activity.
  • Directs seized assets to fund victim services and law enforcement training for human trafficking cases.
  • Requires prosecutors to prove beyond reasonable doubt that property was gained through human trafficking.
  • Protects innocent property owners by exempting assets owned by legitimate purchasers from seizure.
10% progression
Bill has been formally introduced and read for the first time in its house of origin (2/13/2025)
Probability of Passing
We're working on it! Check back later.

Summary

Assembly Member Alanis proposes substantial changes to California's asset forfeiture framework for human trafficking cases through amendments to the California Control of Profits of Organized Crime Act. The legislation removes the requirement to establish a pattern of criminal profiteering activity before seizing assets linked to human trafficking, while maintaining existing forfeiture provisions for cases involving minors.

The bill renames the law as the "California Control of Profits of Organized Crime and Human Trafficking Act" and modifies the distribution of forfeited assets. Under the new framework, proceeds from human trafficking forfeitures would be split equally between the Victim-Witness Assistance Fund and the Board of State and Community Corrections. The Victim-Witness portion would support community organizations serving human trafficking victims, while the Board's allocation would fund sexual assault response teams for law enforcement training, investigation expenses, and equipment purchases.

The legislation preserves key procedural safeguards, including the requirement that prosecuting agencies prove beyond reasonable doubt that defendants engaged in human trafficking and that the property is subject to forfeiture. Property owners maintain the right to contest seizures within 30 days of notification, and the bill explicitly protects the interests of bona fide purchasers. The amendments also retain existing asset forfeiture provisions for human trafficking crimes involving commercial sexual exploitation of minors.

Get Involved

Act Now!

This bill was recently introduced. Email the authors to let them know what you think about it.

Introduced By

Juan Alanis
Juan AlanisR
California State Assembly Member

Community Outlook

No votes yet
Positive
0%
Negative
0%

Latest Voting History

No Voting History Available
N/A
There are currently no voting records for this bill.

Key Dates

Next Step
Referred to the Assembly Standing Committee on Public Safety
Next Step
Assembly Committee
Referred to the Assembly Standing Committee on Public Safety
Hearing has not been scheduled yet
Read first time. To print.
Assembly Floor
Read first time. To print.
Read first time. To print.

Relevant Contacts

Profile
Tom LackeyR
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
James RamosD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Matt HaneyD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Juan AlanisR
Assembly Member
Bill Author
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Stephanie NguyenD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
0 of 9 row(s) selected.
Page 1 of 2
Select All Legislators
Profile
Tom LackeyR
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
James RamosD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Matt HaneyD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Juan AlanisR
Assembly Member
Bill Author
Profile
Stephanie NguyenD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Mark GonzalezD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
John HarabedianD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Nick SchultzD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
LaShae Sharp-CollinsD
Assembly Member
Committee Member

Key Takeaways

  • Expands asset forfeiture laws to seize property from human trafficking without proving a pattern of criminal activity.
  • Directs seized assets to fund victim services and law enforcement training for human trafficking cases.
  • Requires prosecutors to prove beyond reasonable doubt that property was gained through human trafficking.
  • Protects innocent property owners by exempting assets owned by legitimate purchasers from seizure.

Get Involved

Act Now!

This bill was recently introduced. Email the authors to let them know what you think about it.

Introduced By

Juan Alanis
Juan AlanisR
California State Assembly Member

Summary

Assembly Member Alanis proposes substantial changes to California's asset forfeiture framework for human trafficking cases through amendments to the California Control of Profits of Organized Crime Act. The legislation removes the requirement to establish a pattern of criminal profiteering activity before seizing assets linked to human trafficking, while maintaining existing forfeiture provisions for cases involving minors.

The bill renames the law as the "California Control of Profits of Organized Crime and Human Trafficking Act" and modifies the distribution of forfeited assets. Under the new framework, proceeds from human trafficking forfeitures would be split equally between the Victim-Witness Assistance Fund and the Board of State and Community Corrections. The Victim-Witness portion would support community organizations serving human trafficking victims, while the Board's allocation would fund sexual assault response teams for law enforcement training, investigation expenses, and equipment purchases.

The legislation preserves key procedural safeguards, including the requirement that prosecuting agencies prove beyond reasonable doubt that defendants engaged in human trafficking and that the property is subject to forfeiture. Property owners maintain the right to contest seizures within 30 days of notification, and the bill explicitly protects the interests of bona fide purchasers. The amendments also retain existing asset forfeiture provisions for human trafficking crimes involving commercial sexual exploitation of minors.

10% progression
Bill has been formally introduced and read for the first time in its house of origin (2/13/2025)
Probability of Passing
We're working on it! Check back later.

Key Dates

Next Step
Referred to the Assembly Standing Committee on Public Safety
Next Step
Assembly Committee
Referred to the Assembly Standing Committee on Public Safety
Hearing has not been scheduled yet
Read first time. To print.
Assembly Floor
Read first time. To print.
Read first time. To print.

Community Outlook

No votes yet
Positive
0%
Negative
0%

Latest Voting History

No Voting History Available
N/A
There are currently no voting records for this bill.

Relevant Contacts

Profile
Tom LackeyR
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
James RamosD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Matt HaneyD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Juan AlanisR
Assembly Member
Bill Author
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Stephanie NguyenD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
0 of 9 row(s) selected.
Page 1 of 2
Select All Legislators
Profile
Tom LackeyR
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
James RamosD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Matt HaneyD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Juan AlanisR
Assembly Member
Bill Author
Profile
Stephanie NguyenD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Mark GonzalezD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
John HarabedianD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Nick SchultzD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
LaShae Sharp-CollinsD
Assembly Member
Committee Member