veeto
Home
Bills
Feedback
hamburger
    Privacy PolicyResources
    © 2025 Veeto.
    AB-630
    Housing & Homelessness

    Abandoned recreational vehicles.

    Enrolled
    CA
    ∙
    2025-2026 Regular Session
    0
    0
    Track
    Track

    Key Takeaways

    • Authorizes Alameda and Los Angeles counties to dispose of RVs valued at $4,000 or less.
    • Establishes a sunset for the program ending January 1, 2030.
    • Requires 72-hour pre-removal notice, 48-hour owner notices, poststorage hearings, and cost rules.
    • Imposes disposal to licensed dismantlers or scrap processors and annual reporting with DMV/DOJ.

    Summary

    In a bid to address abandoned recreational vehicles in two of the state’s largest counties, Assembly Member Mark González, with a coauthor Senator Arreguín, would authorize Alameda and Los Angeles to implement a temporary program to dispose of recreational vehicles valued at four thousand dollars or less through a tightly prescribed process. The measure is time-limited, expiring on January 1, 2030, and applies only within these counties, establishing a special statutory framework to manage low-value RVs.

    The core mechanism centers on a county-specific, low-value RV disposal pathway that activates when a peace officer or other public-agency employee removes an RV valued at four thousand dollars or less. Key steps include a distinctive notice at least 72 hours before removal (with a limited exception for very low-value cases), immediate reporting to the state’s stolen-vehicle system, and obtaining from the DMV information about interested parties. Within 48 hours of removal, notices are sent to the registered owner and any known interests, describing the storage location, reason for removal, and a 30-day window to claim the RV, along with notice of a poststorage hearing. A poststorage hearing must be conducted promptly after a timely request, within 48 hours, and the hearing’s outcome can determine who bears towing and storage costs if abandonment or inoperability is not established. If the RV remains unclaimed after 30 days and no timely hearing occurred, disposal authorization may be issued to the lienholder, subject to verification that the RV is inoperable; an exception allows disposal if the RV is operable only when it was towed due to an environmental or public-safety hazard. Disposal is limited to licensed dismantlers or scrap processors, with documentation transmitted to the dismantler and retained by the lienholder for a specified period. Agencies must annually report counts of RV removals, occupants found in RVs, and the operability status of removed RVs.

    The bill builds on the existing abandoned-vehicle framework, drawing authority from related procedures and reviews while creating a narrowly scoped, county-specific pilot for low-value recreational vehicles. It relies on established processes such as poststorage hearings and notifications to owners and interested parties, and it ties disposal to a defined sequence of notices, hearings, and cost allocations. The measure requires local agencies to coordinate with the DMV to obtain owner and interest information and to adhere to procedures governing notices, storage, and disposal. Although it does not specify new statewide funding, it imposes potential cost responsibilities on the disposing agency—such as towing and storage costs when an RV is not inoperable or not deemed an abandonment after review—and introduces annual data-reporting obligations to support oversight. The program is described as a special statute for Alameda and Los Angeles, justified by findings that the counties face unique needs in addressing abandoned RVs.

    From a policy perspective, the proposal delineates a structured, due-process-oriented pathway for low-value RV disposal, balancing timely removal with notice, hearing rights, and accountability. Stakeholders—counties, lienholders, RV owners, and interested parties—receive defined roles and timelines, including notice provisions, claim windows, and access to poststorage hearings. The sunset provision ensures re-evaluation after 2030, and the approach emphasizes data collection and transparency through annual reporting alongside a framework that aligns with, but remains distinct from, broader statewide abandoned-vehicle regulations. The measure thereby situates itself as a temporary, targeted mechanism to address localized needs while maintaining alignment with existing regulatory and enforcement structures.

    Key Dates

    Vote on Assembly Floor
    Assembly Floor
    Vote on Assembly Floor
    AB 630 Mark González Concurrence in Senate Amendments
    Vote on Senate Floor
    Senate Floor
    Vote on Senate Floor
    Assembly 3rd Reading AB630 Mark González et al. By Arreguín
    Senate Appropriations Hearing
    Senate Committee
    Senate Appropriations Hearing
    Do pass as amended
    Senate Appropriations Hearing
    Senate Committee
    Senate Appropriations Hearing
    Placed on suspense file
    Senate Public Safety Hearing
    Senate Committee
    Senate Public Safety Hearing
    Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to the Committee on [Appropriations]
    Vote on Assembly Floor
    Assembly Floor
    Vote on Assembly Floor
    AB 630 Mark González Assembly Third Reading
    Assembly Appropriations Hearing
    Assembly Committee
    Assembly Appropriations Hearing
    Do pass
    Assembly Transportation Hearing
    Assembly Committee
    Assembly Transportation Hearing
    Do pass as amended and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]
    Introduced
    Assembly Floor
    Introduced
    Read first time. To print.

    Contacts

    Profile
    Mark GonzalezD
    Assemblymember
    Bill Author
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    Profile
    Jesse ArreguinD
    Senator
    Bill Author
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    0 of 2 row(s) selected.
    Page 1 of 1
    Select All Legislators
    Profile
    Mark GonzalezD
    Assemblymember
    Bill Author
    Profile
    Jesse ArreguinD
    Senator
    Bill Author

    Get Involved

    Act Now!

    Email the authors or create an email template to send to all relevant legislators.

    Introduced By

    Mark Gonzalez
    Mark GonzalezD
    California State Assembly Member
    Co-Author
    Jesse Arreguin
    Jesse ArreguinD
    California State Senator
    70% progression
    Bill has passed both houses in identical form and is being prepared for the Governor (9/12/2025)

    Latest Voting History

    View History
    September 12, 2025
    PASS
    Assembly Floor
    Vote on Assembly Floor
    AyesNoesNVRTotalResult
    760480PASS

    Key Takeaways

    • Authorizes Alameda and Los Angeles counties to dispose of RVs valued at $4,000 or less.
    • Establishes a sunset for the program ending January 1, 2030.
    • Requires 72-hour pre-removal notice, 48-hour owner notices, poststorage hearings, and cost rules.
    • Imposes disposal to licensed dismantlers or scrap processors and annual reporting with DMV/DOJ.

    Get Involved

    Act Now!

    Email the authors or create an email template to send to all relevant legislators.

    Introduced By

    Mark Gonzalez
    Mark GonzalezD
    California State Assembly Member
    Co-Author
    Jesse Arreguin
    Jesse ArreguinD
    California State Senator

    Summary

    In a bid to address abandoned recreational vehicles in two of the state’s largest counties, Assembly Member Mark González, with a coauthor Senator Arreguín, would authorize Alameda and Los Angeles to implement a temporary program to dispose of recreational vehicles valued at four thousand dollars or less through a tightly prescribed process. The measure is time-limited, expiring on January 1, 2030, and applies only within these counties, establishing a special statutory framework to manage low-value RVs.

    The core mechanism centers on a county-specific, low-value RV disposal pathway that activates when a peace officer or other public-agency employee removes an RV valued at four thousand dollars or less. Key steps include a distinctive notice at least 72 hours before removal (with a limited exception for very low-value cases), immediate reporting to the state’s stolen-vehicle system, and obtaining from the DMV information about interested parties. Within 48 hours of removal, notices are sent to the registered owner and any known interests, describing the storage location, reason for removal, and a 30-day window to claim the RV, along with notice of a poststorage hearing. A poststorage hearing must be conducted promptly after a timely request, within 48 hours, and the hearing’s outcome can determine who bears towing and storage costs if abandonment or inoperability is not established. If the RV remains unclaimed after 30 days and no timely hearing occurred, disposal authorization may be issued to the lienholder, subject to verification that the RV is inoperable; an exception allows disposal if the RV is operable only when it was towed due to an environmental or public-safety hazard. Disposal is limited to licensed dismantlers or scrap processors, with documentation transmitted to the dismantler and retained by the lienholder for a specified period. Agencies must annually report counts of RV removals, occupants found in RVs, and the operability status of removed RVs.

    The bill builds on the existing abandoned-vehicle framework, drawing authority from related procedures and reviews while creating a narrowly scoped, county-specific pilot for low-value recreational vehicles. It relies on established processes such as poststorage hearings and notifications to owners and interested parties, and it ties disposal to a defined sequence of notices, hearings, and cost allocations. The measure requires local agencies to coordinate with the DMV to obtain owner and interest information and to adhere to procedures governing notices, storage, and disposal. Although it does not specify new statewide funding, it imposes potential cost responsibilities on the disposing agency—such as towing and storage costs when an RV is not inoperable or not deemed an abandonment after review—and introduces annual data-reporting obligations to support oversight. The program is described as a special statute for Alameda and Los Angeles, justified by findings that the counties face unique needs in addressing abandoned RVs.

    From a policy perspective, the proposal delineates a structured, due-process-oriented pathway for low-value RV disposal, balancing timely removal with notice, hearing rights, and accountability. Stakeholders—counties, lienholders, RV owners, and interested parties—receive defined roles and timelines, including notice provisions, claim windows, and access to poststorage hearings. The sunset provision ensures re-evaluation after 2030, and the approach emphasizes data collection and transparency through annual reporting alongside a framework that aligns with, but remains distinct from, broader statewide abandoned-vehicle regulations. The measure thereby situates itself as a temporary, targeted mechanism to address localized needs while maintaining alignment with existing regulatory and enforcement structures.

    70% progression
    Bill has passed both houses in identical form and is being prepared for the Governor (9/12/2025)

    Key Dates

    Vote on Assembly Floor
    Assembly Floor
    Vote on Assembly Floor
    AB 630 Mark González Concurrence in Senate Amendments
    Vote on Senate Floor
    Senate Floor
    Vote on Senate Floor
    Assembly 3rd Reading AB630 Mark González et al. By Arreguín
    Senate Appropriations Hearing
    Senate Committee
    Senate Appropriations Hearing
    Do pass as amended
    Senate Appropriations Hearing
    Senate Committee
    Senate Appropriations Hearing
    Placed on suspense file
    Senate Public Safety Hearing
    Senate Committee
    Senate Public Safety Hearing
    Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to the Committee on [Appropriations]
    Vote on Assembly Floor
    Assembly Floor
    Vote on Assembly Floor
    AB 630 Mark González Assembly Third Reading
    Assembly Appropriations Hearing
    Assembly Committee
    Assembly Appropriations Hearing
    Do pass
    Assembly Transportation Hearing
    Assembly Committee
    Assembly Transportation Hearing
    Do pass as amended and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]
    Introduced
    Assembly Floor
    Introduced
    Read first time. To print.

    Latest Voting History

    View History
    September 12, 2025
    PASS
    Assembly Floor
    Vote on Assembly Floor
    AyesNoesNVRTotalResult
    760480PASS

    Contacts

    Profile
    Mark GonzalezD
    Assemblymember
    Bill Author
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    Profile
    Jesse ArreguinD
    Senator
    Bill Author
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    0 of 2 row(s) selected.
    Page 1 of 1
    Select All Legislators
    Profile
    Mark GonzalezD
    Assemblymember
    Bill Author
    Profile
    Jesse ArreguinD
    Senator
    Bill Author