veeto
Home
Bills
Feedback
hamburger
    Privacy PolicyResources
    © 2025 Veeto.
    AB-639
    Natural Resources & Water

    Dams: exceptions.

    Enrolled
    CA
    ∙
    2025-2026 Regular Session
    0
    0
    Track
    Track

    Key Takeaways

    • Establishes a narrow exemption from dam status for nine named weirs.
    • Requires the nine weirs to have three feet freeboard on the levee.
    • Defines weir as a delivery structure with removable flashboards in a federal flood-control system.
    • Declares no new appropriations and shifts oversight to federal or local regimes.

    Summary

    Assembly Member Soria’s measure would carve a narrow exemption from the definition of dam for nine named weirs that meet a set of criteria, creating a targeted shift in how these agricultural water delivery structures are regulated. The bill would exempt a barrier from dam status if it does not impound water above the top of a levee and the maximum storage behind the barrier has at least three feet of freeboard, provided the structure functions as a weir. The nine weirs identified by name in the measure would qualify if they meet these conditions and are considered weirs under the bill’s definitions.

    Under the amended framework, existing exemptions for small barriers—such as those not exceeding six feet in height or with storage not in excess of 15 acre-feet—continue to apply to other structures; the new provision targets only the nine named weirs: Peoples Weir, Reynolds Weir, Last Chance Weir, Lemoore Diversion Weir, Island Weir, Crescent Weir, Stinson Weir, Empire Weir No. 1, and Empire Weir No. 2. The bill also defines “weir” in relation to agricultural water delivery and removable components that regulate flow and that are part of a federal flood-control system, establishing the basis for applying the exemption to these structures.

    The measure would shift regulatory oversight for these nine weirs away from dam-safety oversight under the state framework to the extent that such oversight is tied to the dam definition. Federal flood-control authorities or local entities with jurisdiction over these structures would likely continue to regulate them under their respective authorities, though the bill does not specify new state permitting or enforcement mechanisms. The fiscal provisions indicate no new appropriations, and the bill is to be considered by a fiscal committee, with the overall effect focused on definitional scope rather than new funding or programs. The bill does not specify an explicit operative date within the text.

    Legislative history shows introduction in February 2025, amendments in March and June, and passage in the Senate and Assembly in early September 2025, followed by enrollment on September 8, 2025. The proposal narrows the scope of state dam-safety regulation by creating a limited exemption for the nine named weirs, while keeping other existing exemptions for small barriers intact. The ultimate implementation and any practical coordination with federal authorities or local operators will depend on how agencies recognize the nine structures as non-dams for purposes of the state framework and how they continue to be regulated under federal flood-control regimes.

    Key Dates

    Vote on Assembly Floor
    Assembly Floor
    Vote on Assembly Floor
    AB 639 Soria Concurrence in Senate Amendments
    Vote on Senate Floor
    Senate Floor
    Vote on Senate Floor
    Assembly 3rd Reading AB639 Soria By Caballero
    Senate Natural Resources and Water Hearing
    Senate Committee
    Senate Natural Resources and Water Hearing
    Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to the Committee on [Appropriations]
    Vote on Assembly Floor
    Assembly Floor
    Vote on Assembly Floor
    AB 639 Soria Assembly Third Reading
    Assembly Appropriations Hearing
    Assembly Committee
    Assembly Appropriations Hearing
    Do pass
    Assembly Water, Parks, And Wildlife Hearing
    Assembly Committee
    Assembly Water, Parks, And Wildlife Hearing
    Do pass as amended and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]
    Introduced
    Assembly Floor
    Introduced
    Read first time. To print.

    Contacts

    Profile
    Esmeralda SoriaD
    Assemblymember
    Bill Author
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    0 of 1 row(s) selected.
    Page 1 of 1
    Select All Legislators
    Profile
    Esmeralda SoriaD
    Assemblymember
    Bill Author

    Get Involved

    Act Now!

    Email the authors or create an email template to send to all relevant legislators.

    Introduced By

    Esmeralda Soria
    Esmeralda SoriaD
    California State Assembly Member
    70% progression
    Bill has passed both houses in identical form and is being prepared for the Governor (9/4/2025)

    Latest Voting History

    View History
    September 4, 2025
    PASS
    Assembly Floor
    Vote on Assembly Floor
    AyesNoesNVRTotalResult
    780179PASS

    Key Takeaways

    • Establishes a narrow exemption from dam status for nine named weirs.
    • Requires the nine weirs to have three feet freeboard on the levee.
    • Defines weir as a delivery structure with removable flashboards in a federal flood-control system.
    • Declares no new appropriations and shifts oversight to federal or local regimes.

    Get Involved

    Act Now!

    Email the authors or create an email template to send to all relevant legislators.

    Introduced By

    Esmeralda Soria
    Esmeralda SoriaD
    California State Assembly Member

    Summary

    Assembly Member Soria’s measure would carve a narrow exemption from the definition of dam for nine named weirs that meet a set of criteria, creating a targeted shift in how these agricultural water delivery structures are regulated. The bill would exempt a barrier from dam status if it does not impound water above the top of a levee and the maximum storage behind the barrier has at least three feet of freeboard, provided the structure functions as a weir. The nine weirs identified by name in the measure would qualify if they meet these conditions and are considered weirs under the bill’s definitions.

    Under the amended framework, existing exemptions for small barriers—such as those not exceeding six feet in height or with storage not in excess of 15 acre-feet—continue to apply to other structures; the new provision targets only the nine named weirs: Peoples Weir, Reynolds Weir, Last Chance Weir, Lemoore Diversion Weir, Island Weir, Crescent Weir, Stinson Weir, Empire Weir No. 1, and Empire Weir No. 2. The bill also defines “weir” in relation to agricultural water delivery and removable components that regulate flow and that are part of a federal flood-control system, establishing the basis for applying the exemption to these structures.

    The measure would shift regulatory oversight for these nine weirs away from dam-safety oversight under the state framework to the extent that such oversight is tied to the dam definition. Federal flood-control authorities or local entities with jurisdiction over these structures would likely continue to regulate them under their respective authorities, though the bill does not specify new state permitting or enforcement mechanisms. The fiscal provisions indicate no new appropriations, and the bill is to be considered by a fiscal committee, with the overall effect focused on definitional scope rather than new funding or programs. The bill does not specify an explicit operative date within the text.

    Legislative history shows introduction in February 2025, amendments in March and June, and passage in the Senate and Assembly in early September 2025, followed by enrollment on September 8, 2025. The proposal narrows the scope of state dam-safety regulation by creating a limited exemption for the nine named weirs, while keeping other existing exemptions for small barriers intact. The ultimate implementation and any practical coordination with federal authorities or local operators will depend on how agencies recognize the nine structures as non-dams for purposes of the state framework and how they continue to be regulated under federal flood-control regimes.

    70% progression
    Bill has passed both houses in identical form and is being prepared for the Governor (9/4/2025)

    Key Dates

    Vote on Assembly Floor
    Assembly Floor
    Vote on Assembly Floor
    AB 639 Soria Concurrence in Senate Amendments
    Vote on Senate Floor
    Senate Floor
    Vote on Senate Floor
    Assembly 3rd Reading AB639 Soria By Caballero
    Senate Natural Resources and Water Hearing
    Senate Committee
    Senate Natural Resources and Water Hearing
    Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to the Committee on [Appropriations]
    Vote on Assembly Floor
    Assembly Floor
    Vote on Assembly Floor
    AB 639 Soria Assembly Third Reading
    Assembly Appropriations Hearing
    Assembly Committee
    Assembly Appropriations Hearing
    Do pass
    Assembly Water, Parks, And Wildlife Hearing
    Assembly Committee
    Assembly Water, Parks, And Wildlife Hearing
    Do pass as amended and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]
    Introduced
    Assembly Floor
    Introduced
    Read first time. To print.

    Latest Voting History

    View History
    September 4, 2025
    PASS
    Assembly Floor
    Vote on Assembly Floor
    AyesNoesNVRTotalResult
    780179PASS

    Contacts

    Profile
    Esmeralda SoriaD
    Assemblymember
    Bill Author
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    0 of 1 row(s) selected.
    Page 1 of 1
    Select All Legislators
    Profile
    Esmeralda SoriaD
    Assemblymember
    Bill Author