veeto
Home
Bills
Feedback
hamburger
    Privacy PolicyResources
    © 2025 Veeto.
    AB-651
    Justice & Public Safety

    Juveniles: dependency: incarcerated parent.

    Enrolled
    CA
    ∙
    2025-2026 Regular Session
    0
    0
    Track
    Track

    Key Takeaways

    • Expands notice and in-person presence for incarcerated parents in more hearings.
    • Requires videoconference or teleconference options if presence is waived or unavailable.
    • Extends attendance and participation rights to nonminor dependents.
    • Creates a framework for local cost reimbursement if state-mandated costs occur.

    Summary

    Bryan, with principal coauthor Solache, advances a measure to broaden the duty to notify and accommodate the physical presence of incarcerated parents in a wider array of dependency proceedings, while permitting participation by videoconference or teleconference when in-person attendance is waived or not feasible. The bill also extends attendance rights to nonminor dependents in juvenile court contexts, expanding the scope of who may be present and represented in these proceedings.

    The proposal expands the set of hearings for which incarcerated parents must receive notice and have the opportunity to be physically present, including proceedings related to the termination of parental rights, the adjudication of a child as a dependent, and related matters involving a prisoner’s family. Service of notice would continue under existing Family Code and Welfare and Institutions Code mechanisms, and a court shall not adjudicate these matters without the prisoner’s physical presence or a properly cited waiver unless an affidavit from an institutional official indicates the prisoner does not intend to appear. If a waiver exists or in cases where in-person attendance is not feasible, the prisoner’s participation may occur by videoconference, with teleconferencing as a substitute if videoconferencing is unavailable; in all cases, in-person attendance remains possible and is not replaced by remote participation. The bill preserves a process to temporarily remove the prisoner from custody to attend proceedings and requires advance notice to the warden, with the court and sheriff carrying out the appearance and return, while the prisoner remains in constructive custody during these arrangements. It also retains a death-penalty exception and clarifies that the option for remote participation does not nullify in-person visits.

    Implementation would require expanded duties for local jail officials to provide notice and facilitate attendance, including coordinating videoconference or teleconference participation; these duties are recognized as a state-mandated local program, with potential local costs that may be reimbursed if the state mandates them. In parallel, the bill extends the right to attend and participate at hearings to nonminor dependents, ensuring they may be represented by counsel of their choice, addressed in court, and provided with continuances only to the extent necessary to provide notice and secure attendance. A reimbursement framework is provided if the Commission on State Mandates determines state-mandated costs exist, aligning with existing procedures for local government cost recovery.

    Together, the changes place greater emphasis on the involvement of incarcerated parents and nonminor dependents in dependency-related decisions by expanding who must be notified, how participation can occur, and the procedural protections surrounding attendance. The measure preserves due process elements—notice, counsel, and opportunities to address the court—while detailing the operational and fiscal responsibilities placed on courts, sheriffs, and county agencies to implement these participation rights.

    Key Dates

    Vote on Senate Floor
    Senate Floor
    Vote on Senate Floor
    Special Consent AB651 Bryan et al
    Senate Appropriations Hearing
    Senate Committee
    Senate Appropriations Hearing
    Do pass
    Senate Appropriations Hearing
    Senate Committee
    Senate Appropriations Hearing
    Placed on suspense file
    Senate Judiciary Hearing
    Senate Committee
    Senate Judiciary Hearing
    Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations] with the recommendation: To Consent Calendar
    Senate Public Safety Hearing
    Senate Committee
    Senate Public Safety Hearing
    Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Judiciary] with the recommendation: To Consent Calendar
    Vote on Assembly Floor
    Assembly Floor
    Vote on Assembly Floor
    AB 651 Bryan Assembly Third Reading
    Assembly Appropriations Hearing
    Assembly Committee
    Assembly Appropriations Hearing
    Do pass
    Assembly Judiciary Hearing
    Assembly Committee
    Assembly Judiciary Hearing
    Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations] with recommendation: To Consent Calendar
    Assembly Public Safety Hearing
    Assembly Committee
    Assembly Public Safety Hearing
    Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Judiciary] with recommendation: To Consent Calendar
    Introduced
    Assembly Floor
    Introduced
    Read first time. To print.

    Contacts

    Profile
    Isaac BryanD
    Assemblymember
    Bill Author
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    Profile
    Jose SolacheD
    Assemblymember
    Bill Author
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    0 of 2 row(s) selected.
    Page 1 of 1
    Select All Legislators
    Profile
    Isaac BryanD
    Assemblymember
    Bill Author
    Profile
    Jose SolacheD
    Assemblymember
    Bill Author

    Get Involved

    Act Now!

    Email the authors or create an email template to send to all relevant legislators.

    Introduced By

    Jose Solache
    Jose SolacheD
    California State Assembly Member
    Isaac Bryan
    Isaac BryanD
    California State Assembly Member
    70% progression
    Bill has passed both houses in identical form and is being prepared for the Governor (9/4/2025)

    Latest Voting History

    View History
    September 4, 2025
    PASS
    Senate Floor
    Vote on Senate Floor
    AyesNoesNVRTotalResult
    390140PASS

    Key Takeaways

    • Expands notice and in-person presence for incarcerated parents in more hearings.
    • Requires videoconference or teleconference options if presence is waived or unavailable.
    • Extends attendance and participation rights to nonminor dependents.
    • Creates a framework for local cost reimbursement if state-mandated costs occur.

    Get Involved

    Act Now!

    Email the authors or create an email template to send to all relevant legislators.

    Introduced By

    Jose Solache
    Jose SolacheD
    California State Assembly Member
    Isaac Bryan
    Isaac BryanD
    California State Assembly Member

    Summary

    Bryan, with principal coauthor Solache, advances a measure to broaden the duty to notify and accommodate the physical presence of incarcerated parents in a wider array of dependency proceedings, while permitting participation by videoconference or teleconference when in-person attendance is waived or not feasible. The bill also extends attendance rights to nonminor dependents in juvenile court contexts, expanding the scope of who may be present and represented in these proceedings.

    The proposal expands the set of hearings for which incarcerated parents must receive notice and have the opportunity to be physically present, including proceedings related to the termination of parental rights, the adjudication of a child as a dependent, and related matters involving a prisoner’s family. Service of notice would continue under existing Family Code and Welfare and Institutions Code mechanisms, and a court shall not adjudicate these matters without the prisoner’s physical presence or a properly cited waiver unless an affidavit from an institutional official indicates the prisoner does not intend to appear. If a waiver exists or in cases where in-person attendance is not feasible, the prisoner’s participation may occur by videoconference, with teleconferencing as a substitute if videoconferencing is unavailable; in all cases, in-person attendance remains possible and is not replaced by remote participation. The bill preserves a process to temporarily remove the prisoner from custody to attend proceedings and requires advance notice to the warden, with the court and sheriff carrying out the appearance and return, while the prisoner remains in constructive custody during these arrangements. It also retains a death-penalty exception and clarifies that the option for remote participation does not nullify in-person visits.

    Implementation would require expanded duties for local jail officials to provide notice and facilitate attendance, including coordinating videoconference or teleconference participation; these duties are recognized as a state-mandated local program, with potential local costs that may be reimbursed if the state mandates them. In parallel, the bill extends the right to attend and participate at hearings to nonminor dependents, ensuring they may be represented by counsel of their choice, addressed in court, and provided with continuances only to the extent necessary to provide notice and secure attendance. A reimbursement framework is provided if the Commission on State Mandates determines state-mandated costs exist, aligning with existing procedures for local government cost recovery.

    Together, the changes place greater emphasis on the involvement of incarcerated parents and nonminor dependents in dependency-related decisions by expanding who must be notified, how participation can occur, and the procedural protections surrounding attendance. The measure preserves due process elements—notice, counsel, and opportunities to address the court—while detailing the operational and fiscal responsibilities placed on courts, sheriffs, and county agencies to implement these participation rights.

    70% progression
    Bill has passed both houses in identical form and is being prepared for the Governor (9/4/2025)

    Key Dates

    Vote on Senate Floor
    Senate Floor
    Vote on Senate Floor
    Special Consent AB651 Bryan et al
    Senate Appropriations Hearing
    Senate Committee
    Senate Appropriations Hearing
    Do pass
    Senate Appropriations Hearing
    Senate Committee
    Senate Appropriations Hearing
    Placed on suspense file
    Senate Judiciary Hearing
    Senate Committee
    Senate Judiciary Hearing
    Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations] with the recommendation: To Consent Calendar
    Senate Public Safety Hearing
    Senate Committee
    Senate Public Safety Hearing
    Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Judiciary] with the recommendation: To Consent Calendar
    Vote on Assembly Floor
    Assembly Floor
    Vote on Assembly Floor
    AB 651 Bryan Assembly Third Reading
    Assembly Appropriations Hearing
    Assembly Committee
    Assembly Appropriations Hearing
    Do pass
    Assembly Judiciary Hearing
    Assembly Committee
    Assembly Judiciary Hearing
    Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations] with recommendation: To Consent Calendar
    Assembly Public Safety Hearing
    Assembly Committee
    Assembly Public Safety Hearing
    Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Judiciary] with recommendation: To Consent Calendar
    Introduced
    Assembly Floor
    Introduced
    Read first time. To print.

    Latest Voting History

    View History
    September 4, 2025
    PASS
    Senate Floor
    Vote on Senate Floor
    AyesNoesNVRTotalResult
    390140PASS

    Contacts

    Profile
    Isaac BryanD
    Assemblymember
    Bill Author
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    Profile
    Jose SolacheD
    Assemblymember
    Bill Author
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    0 of 2 row(s) selected.
    Page 1 of 1
    Select All Legislators
    Profile
    Isaac BryanD
    Assemblymember
    Bill Author
    Profile
    Jose SolacheD
    Assemblymember
    Bill Author