AB-651
Justice & Public Safety

Juveniles: dependency: incarcerated parent.

Enrolled
CA
2025-2026 Regular Session
0
0
Track

Key Takeaways

  • Expands notice and in-person presence for incarcerated parents in more hearings.
  • Requires videoconference or teleconference options if presence is waived or unavailable.
  • Extends attendance and participation rights to nonminor dependents.
  • Creates a framework for local cost reimbursement if state-mandated costs occur.

Summary

Bryan, with principal coauthor Solache, advances a measure to broaden the duty to notify and accommodate the physical presence of incarcerated parents in a wider array of dependency proceedings, while permitting participation by videoconference or teleconference when in-person attendance is waived or not feasible. The bill also extends attendance rights to nonminor dependents in juvenile court contexts, expanding the scope of who may be present and represented in these proceedings.

The proposal expands the set of hearings for which incarcerated parents must receive notice and have the opportunity to be physically present, including proceedings related to the termination of parental rights, the adjudication of a child as a dependent, and related matters involving a prisoner’s family. Service of notice would continue under existing Family Code and Welfare and Institutions Code mechanisms, and a court shall not adjudicate these matters without the prisoner’s physical presence or a properly cited waiver unless an affidavit from an institutional official indicates the prisoner does not intend to appear. If a waiver exists or in cases where in-person attendance is not feasible, the prisoner’s participation may occur by videoconference, with teleconferencing as a substitute if videoconferencing is unavailable; in all cases, in-person attendance remains possible and is not replaced by remote participation. The bill preserves a process to temporarily remove the prisoner from custody to attend proceedings and requires advance notice to the warden, with the court and sheriff carrying out the appearance and return, while the prisoner remains in constructive custody during these arrangements. It also retains a death-penalty exception and clarifies that the option for remote participation does not nullify in-person visits.

Implementation would require expanded duties for local jail officials to provide notice and facilitate attendance, including coordinating videoconference or teleconference participation; these duties are recognized as a state-mandated local program, with potential local costs that may be reimbursed if the state mandates them. In parallel, the bill extends the right to attend and participate at hearings to nonminor dependents, ensuring they may be represented by counsel of their choice, addressed in court, and provided with continuances only to the extent necessary to provide notice and secure attendance. A reimbursement framework is provided if the Commission on State Mandates determines state-mandated costs exist, aligning with existing procedures for local government cost recovery.

Together, the changes place greater emphasis on the involvement of incarcerated parents and nonminor dependents in dependency-related decisions by expanding who must be notified, how participation can occur, and the procedural protections surrounding attendance. The measure preserves due process elements—notice, counsel, and opportunities to address the court—while detailing the operational and fiscal responsibilities placed on courts, sheriffs, and county agencies to implement these participation rights.

Key Dates

Vote on Senate Floor
Senate Floor
Vote on Senate Floor
Special Consent AB651 Bryan et al
Senate Appropriations Hearing
Senate Committee
Senate Appropriations Hearing
Do pass
Senate Appropriations Hearing
Senate Committee
Senate Appropriations Hearing
Placed on suspense file
Senate Judiciary Hearing
Senate Committee
Senate Judiciary Hearing
Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations] with the recommendation: To Consent Calendar
Senate Public Safety Hearing
Senate Committee
Senate Public Safety Hearing
Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Judiciary] with the recommendation: To Consent Calendar
Vote on Assembly Floor
Assembly Floor
Vote on Assembly Floor
AB 651 Bryan Assembly Third Reading
Assembly Appropriations Hearing
Assembly Committee
Assembly Appropriations Hearing
Do pass
Assembly Judiciary Hearing
Assembly Committee
Assembly Judiciary Hearing
Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations] with recommendation: To Consent Calendar
Assembly Public Safety Hearing
Assembly Committee
Assembly Public Safety Hearing
Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Judiciary] with recommendation: To Consent Calendar
Introduced
Assembly Floor
Introduced
Read first time. To print.

Contacts

Profile
Isaac BryanD
Assemblymember
Bill Author
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Jose SolacheD
Assemblymember
Bill Author
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
0 of 2 row(s) selected.
Page 1 of 1
Select All Legislators
Profile
Isaac BryanD
Assemblymember
Bill Author
Profile
Jose SolacheD
Assemblymember
Bill Author

Get Involved

Act Now!

Email the authors or create an email template to send to all relevant legislators.

Introduced By

Jose Solache
Jose SolacheD
California State Assembly Member
Isaac Bryan
Isaac BryanD
California State Assembly Member
70% progression
Bill has passed both houses in identical form and is being prepared for the Governor (9/4/2025)

Latest Voting History

September 4, 2025
PASS
Senate Floor
Vote on Senate Floor
AyesNoesNVRTotalResult
390140PASS

Key Takeaways

  • Expands notice and in-person presence for incarcerated parents in more hearings.
  • Requires videoconference or teleconference options if presence is waived or unavailable.
  • Extends attendance and participation rights to nonminor dependents.
  • Creates a framework for local cost reimbursement if state-mandated costs occur.

Get Involved

Act Now!

Email the authors or create an email template to send to all relevant legislators.

Introduced By

Jose Solache
Jose SolacheD
California State Assembly Member
Isaac Bryan
Isaac BryanD
California State Assembly Member

Summary

Bryan, with principal coauthor Solache, advances a measure to broaden the duty to notify and accommodate the physical presence of incarcerated parents in a wider array of dependency proceedings, while permitting participation by videoconference or teleconference when in-person attendance is waived or not feasible. The bill also extends attendance rights to nonminor dependents in juvenile court contexts, expanding the scope of who may be present and represented in these proceedings.

The proposal expands the set of hearings for which incarcerated parents must receive notice and have the opportunity to be physically present, including proceedings related to the termination of parental rights, the adjudication of a child as a dependent, and related matters involving a prisoner’s family. Service of notice would continue under existing Family Code and Welfare and Institutions Code mechanisms, and a court shall not adjudicate these matters without the prisoner’s physical presence or a properly cited waiver unless an affidavit from an institutional official indicates the prisoner does not intend to appear. If a waiver exists or in cases where in-person attendance is not feasible, the prisoner’s participation may occur by videoconference, with teleconferencing as a substitute if videoconferencing is unavailable; in all cases, in-person attendance remains possible and is not replaced by remote participation. The bill preserves a process to temporarily remove the prisoner from custody to attend proceedings and requires advance notice to the warden, with the court and sheriff carrying out the appearance and return, while the prisoner remains in constructive custody during these arrangements. It also retains a death-penalty exception and clarifies that the option for remote participation does not nullify in-person visits.

Implementation would require expanded duties for local jail officials to provide notice and facilitate attendance, including coordinating videoconference or teleconference participation; these duties are recognized as a state-mandated local program, with potential local costs that may be reimbursed if the state mandates them. In parallel, the bill extends the right to attend and participate at hearings to nonminor dependents, ensuring they may be represented by counsel of their choice, addressed in court, and provided with continuances only to the extent necessary to provide notice and secure attendance. A reimbursement framework is provided if the Commission on State Mandates determines state-mandated costs exist, aligning with existing procedures for local government cost recovery.

Together, the changes place greater emphasis on the involvement of incarcerated parents and nonminor dependents in dependency-related decisions by expanding who must be notified, how participation can occur, and the procedural protections surrounding attendance. The measure preserves due process elements—notice, counsel, and opportunities to address the court—while detailing the operational and fiscal responsibilities placed on courts, sheriffs, and county agencies to implement these participation rights.

70% progression
Bill has passed both houses in identical form and is being prepared for the Governor (9/4/2025)

Key Dates

Vote on Senate Floor
Senate Floor
Vote on Senate Floor
Special Consent AB651 Bryan et al
Senate Appropriations Hearing
Senate Committee
Senate Appropriations Hearing
Do pass
Senate Appropriations Hearing
Senate Committee
Senate Appropriations Hearing
Placed on suspense file
Senate Judiciary Hearing
Senate Committee
Senate Judiciary Hearing
Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations] with the recommendation: To Consent Calendar
Senate Public Safety Hearing
Senate Committee
Senate Public Safety Hearing
Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Judiciary] with the recommendation: To Consent Calendar
Vote on Assembly Floor
Assembly Floor
Vote on Assembly Floor
AB 651 Bryan Assembly Third Reading
Assembly Appropriations Hearing
Assembly Committee
Assembly Appropriations Hearing
Do pass
Assembly Judiciary Hearing
Assembly Committee
Assembly Judiciary Hearing
Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations] with recommendation: To Consent Calendar
Assembly Public Safety Hearing
Assembly Committee
Assembly Public Safety Hearing
Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Judiciary] with recommendation: To Consent Calendar
Introduced
Assembly Floor
Introduced
Read first time. To print.

Latest Voting History

September 4, 2025
PASS
Senate Floor
Vote on Senate Floor
AyesNoesNVRTotalResult
390140PASS

Contacts

Profile
Isaac BryanD
Assemblymember
Bill Author
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Jose SolacheD
Assemblymember
Bill Author
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
0 of 2 row(s) selected.
Page 1 of 1
Select All Legislators
Profile
Isaac BryanD
Assemblymember
Bill Author
Profile
Jose SolacheD
Assemblymember
Bill Author