veeto
Home
Bills
Influence
Feedback
hamburger
    Privacy Policy
    © 2025 Veeto. All rights reserved.
    AB-690
    Justice & Public Safety

    Criminal procedure: indigent defense compensation.

    Introduced
    CA
    ∙
    2025-2026 Regular Session
    0
    0
    Track
    Track

    Key Takeaways

    • Reforms indigent defense contracts to ensure quality legal representation for low-income defendants by 2027.
    • Prohibits flat-fee payment structures for public defense attorneys to prevent financial conflicts of interest.
    • Requires counties to provide separate funding for defense services like investigators and social workers.
    • Mandates contracts align attorney caseloads with national workload standards to ensure adequate time per case.

    Summary

    Assembly Member Schultz's indigent defense reform legislation overhauls how California counties contract for legal services for defendants who cannot afford private attorneys, establishing new requirements aimed at ensuring adequate resources for effective representation. The measure prohibits counties from using flat-fee arrangements that pay attorneys a fixed amount regardless of time spent on cases, a practice the bill's authors assert creates conflicts of interest that can compromise defense quality.

    Beginning January 2027, counties must structure indigent defense contracts to explicitly link compensation to caseload volumes, using recent national workload studies to determine appropriate case limits. Contracts must allocate separate funding for support services like investigators and social workers, while providing mechanisms for attorneys to seek additional resources when cases require more time or expertise than initially anticipated. The legislation requires counties to submit their indigent defense contracts to the Office of the State Public Defender every two years for review.

    The measure maintains existing requirements that courts first utilize public defenders when available, followed by contracted attorneys, before appointing other private counsel. It preserves provisions giving court-appointed attorneys and investigators the same access to case information as public defenders, while clarifying that this does not extend to confidential motor vehicle records or subpoena powers. Counties that determine the new contracting requirements create additional costs may seek reimbursement through the state mandate process.

    Key Dates

    Next Step
    Referred to the Assembly Standing Committee on Appropriations
    Next Step
    Assembly Committee
    Referred to the Assembly Standing Committee on Appropriations
    Hearing has not been scheduled yet
    Assembly Public Safety Hearing
    Assembly Committee
    Assembly Public Safety Hearing
    Assembly Public Safety Hearing
    Read first time. To print.
    Assembly Floor
    Read first time. To print.
    Read first time. To print.

    Contacts

    Profile
    Joaquin ArambulaD
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    Profile
    Buffy WicksD
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    Profile
    Lisa CalderonD
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    Profile
    Mike FongD
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    Profile
    Diane DixonR
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    0 of 16 row(s) selected.
    Page 1 of 4
    Select All Legislators
    Profile
    Joaquin ArambulaD
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Buffy WicksD
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Lisa CalderonD
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Mike FongD
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Diane DixonR
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Gregg HartD
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Blanca PachecoD
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Gail PellerinD
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Kate SanchezR
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Tri TaR
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Jessica CalozaD
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Mark GonzalezD
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Heather HadwickR
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Nick SchultzD
    Assemblymember
    Bill Author
    Profile
    Jose SolacheD
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Sade ElhawaryD
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member

    Get Involved

    Act Now!

    Email the authors or create an email template to send to all relevant legislators.

    Introduced By

    Nick Schultz
    Nick SchultzD
    California State Assembly Member
    10% progression
    Bill has been formally introduced and read for the first time in its house of origin (2/14/2025)

    Latest Voting History

    View History
    March 25, 2025
    PASS
    Assembly Committee
    Assembly Public Safety Hearing
    AyesNoesNVRTotalResult
    9009PASS

    Key Takeaways

    • Reforms indigent defense contracts to ensure quality legal representation for low-income defendants by 2027.
    • Prohibits flat-fee payment structures for public defense attorneys to prevent financial conflicts of interest.
    • Requires counties to provide separate funding for defense services like investigators and social workers.
    • Mandates contracts align attorney caseloads with national workload standards to ensure adequate time per case.

    Get Involved

    Act Now!

    Email the authors or create an email template to send to all relevant legislators.

    Introduced By

    Nick Schultz
    Nick SchultzD
    California State Assembly Member

    Summary

    Assembly Member Schultz's indigent defense reform legislation overhauls how California counties contract for legal services for defendants who cannot afford private attorneys, establishing new requirements aimed at ensuring adequate resources for effective representation. The measure prohibits counties from using flat-fee arrangements that pay attorneys a fixed amount regardless of time spent on cases, a practice the bill's authors assert creates conflicts of interest that can compromise defense quality.

    Beginning January 2027, counties must structure indigent defense contracts to explicitly link compensation to caseload volumes, using recent national workload studies to determine appropriate case limits. Contracts must allocate separate funding for support services like investigators and social workers, while providing mechanisms for attorneys to seek additional resources when cases require more time or expertise than initially anticipated. The legislation requires counties to submit their indigent defense contracts to the Office of the State Public Defender every two years for review.

    The measure maintains existing requirements that courts first utilize public defenders when available, followed by contracted attorneys, before appointing other private counsel. It preserves provisions giving court-appointed attorneys and investigators the same access to case information as public defenders, while clarifying that this does not extend to confidential motor vehicle records or subpoena powers. Counties that determine the new contracting requirements create additional costs may seek reimbursement through the state mandate process.

    10% progression
    Bill has been formally introduced and read for the first time in its house of origin (2/14/2025)

    Key Dates

    Next Step
    Referred to the Assembly Standing Committee on Appropriations
    Next Step
    Assembly Committee
    Referred to the Assembly Standing Committee on Appropriations
    Hearing has not been scheduled yet
    Assembly Public Safety Hearing
    Assembly Committee
    Assembly Public Safety Hearing
    Assembly Public Safety Hearing
    Read first time. To print.
    Assembly Floor
    Read first time. To print.
    Read first time. To print.

    Latest Voting History

    View History
    March 25, 2025
    PASS
    Assembly Committee
    Assembly Public Safety Hearing
    AyesNoesNVRTotalResult
    9009PASS

    Contacts

    Profile
    Joaquin ArambulaD
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    Profile
    Buffy WicksD
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    Profile
    Lisa CalderonD
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    Profile
    Mike FongD
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    Profile
    Diane DixonR
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    0 of 16 row(s) selected.
    Page 1 of 4
    Select All Legislators
    Profile
    Joaquin ArambulaD
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Buffy WicksD
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Lisa CalderonD
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Mike FongD
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Diane DixonR
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Gregg HartD
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Blanca PachecoD
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Gail PellerinD
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Kate SanchezR
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Tri TaR
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Jessica CalozaD
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Mark GonzalezD
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Heather HadwickR
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Nick SchultzD
    Assemblymember
    Bill Author
    Profile
    Jose SolacheD
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Sade ElhawaryD
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member