veeto
Home
Bills
Feedback
hamburger
    Privacy PolicyResources
    © 2025 Veeto.
    AB-720
    Agriculture & Food

    Beverages: alcohol permits: container labeling.

    Enrolled
    CA
    ∙
    2025-2026 Regular Session
    0
    0
    Track
    Track

    Key Takeaways

    • Adds estate tasting event permit for winegrowers with 36 events/year cap and $100 per event.
    • Permits storage, aging, tastings, and off-site sales for master-branch licenses at the same premises.
    • Requires machine-readable marks at least 1/2 inch and allows chasing arrows inside labels.
    • Extends CRV exemptions to July 1, 2026 for new containers and July 1, 2025 for those labeled.

    Summary

    Assembly Member Rogers advances a package of beverage-policy changes that begins by clarifying licensing boundaries and then expands on off‑premises activities and labeling requirements. The measure clarifies that the storage or topping of wine barrels does not count as production or manufacture, narrowing the scope of activities that may be conducted away from the licensed premises. It also allows a winegrower’s license and a brandy manufacturer’s license held on the same premises—where one license is a master license and the other a branch license—to store, age, conduct tastings, and sell wine for off‑premises consumption.

    A core licensing mechanism grants new flexibility for estate-level activities: a winegrower may apply for an estate tasting event permit that authorizes the winegrower to exercise tasting-room privileges for wine manufactured by or for the winegrower at locations adjacent to the licensed premises or at an adjacent vineyard owned or controlled by the licensee. Each estate tasting event requires department consent in the form of an estate tasting event authorization, which carries an event fee of one hundred dollars and may not exceed 36 events per licensee per calendar year. The estate tasting event permit also carries an annual fee of two hundred dollars and is transferable as part of the winegrower’s license. The licensee must obtain local land-use consent for approved events, and the authorization becomes void if local approval is not granted, with the authorization nonrefundable.

    On the labeling and container-recycling front, the measure would extend and modify redemption-value labeling requirements applicable to beverage containers. It authorizes a beverage manufacturer to etch the required redemption value message on the container and maintains the option to print, emboss, stamp, or affix the required labeling. The department may require machine‑readable markings (such as a scan code, QR code, or UPC), with a minimum size of one‑half inch. In lieu of the text “DEPOSIT,” a chasing arrows symbol may be used inside the machine‑readable label if permitted by related regulations. The bill also extends exemptions for containers that began to fall within the division’s scope on certain dates, delaying labeling requirements to July 1, 2026 (with related exemptions for containers filled and labeled before a specified date), and defines certain containers as “empty” for purposes of the division as of January 1, 2024. In addition, the new labeling framework includes a provision that manufacturers shall self‑certify compliance with criteria provided by the department, rather than requiring department samples for every label approval, while preserving local regulatory latitude over land-use and permitting.

    Implementation and fiscal provisions accompany these changes: fees associated with licenses and renewals would continue to fund the Alcohol Beverage Control Fund, with adjustments governed by an index tied to consumer-price movements and annual publication by the department. The measure also states that no reimbursement to local agencies is required for the costs associated with these changes, aligning with a broader framework that treats administrative costs as funding through the department’s fee structure rather than new state‑local funding obligations. Collectively, the proposals situate license flexibility, consumer-facing tasting opportunities, and modernized labeling within a single policy package, tying industry practices to updated regulatory standards and local review processes while preserving the department’s administrative oversight.

    Key Dates

    Next Step
    Referred to the Senate Standing Committee on Rules
    Next Step
    Senate Committee
    Referred to the Senate Standing Committee on Rules
    Hearing has not been scheduled yet
    Vote on Assembly Floor
    Assembly Floor
    Vote on Assembly Floor
    AB 720 Rogers Concurrence in Senate Amendments
    Vote on Senate Floor
    Senate Floor
    Vote on Senate Floor
    Assembly 3rd Reading AB720 Rogers By Cabaldon
    Senate Environmental Quality Hearing
    Senate Committee
    Senate Environmental Quality Hearing
    That the measure be returned to Senate Floor for consideration. Ordered to third reading
    Senate Governmental Organization Hearing
    Senate Committee
    Senate Governmental Organization Hearing
    Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]
    Vote on Assembly Floor
    Assembly Floor
    Vote on Assembly Floor
    AB 720 Rogers Consent Calendar Second Day Regular Session
    Assembly Appropriations Hearing
    Assembly Committee
    Assembly Appropriations Hearing
    Do pass. To Consent Calendar
    Assembly Governmental Organization Hearing
    Assembly Committee
    Assembly Governmental Organization Hearing
    Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations] with recommendation: To Consent Calendar
    Introduced
    Assembly Floor
    Introduced
    Read first time. To print.

    Contacts

    Profile
    Shannon GroveR
    Senator
    Committee Member
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    Profile
    Brian JonesR
    Senator
    Committee Member
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    Profile
    Mike McGuireD
    Senator
    Committee Member
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    Profile
    Eloise ReyesD
    Senator
    Committee Member
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    Profile
    John LairdD
    Senator
    Committee Member
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    0 of 6 row(s) selected.
    Page 1 of 2
    Select All Legislators
    Profile
    Shannon GroveR
    Senator
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Brian JonesR
    Senator
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Mike McGuireD
    Senator
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Eloise ReyesD
    Senator
    Committee Member
    Profile
    John LairdD
    Senator
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Chris RogersD
    Assemblymember
    Bill Author

    Similar Past Legislation

    Bill NumberTitleIntroduced DateStatusLink to Bill
    Winegrowers and brandy manufacturers: exercise of privileges: locations.
    January 2021
    Passed
    View Bill
    Winegrowers and brandy manufacturers: exercise of privileges: locations.
    February 2020
    Failed
    View Bill
    Showing 2 of 2 items
    Page 1 of 1

    Get Involved

    Act Now!

    Email the authors or create an email template to send to all relevant legislators.

    Introduced By

    Chris Rogers
    Chris RogersD
    California State Assembly Member
    70% progression
    Bill has passed both houses in identical form and is being prepared for the Governor (9/13/2025)

    Latest Voting History

    View History
    September 13, 2025
    PASS
    Assembly Floor
    Vote on Assembly Floor
    AyesNoesNVRTotalResult
    800080PASS

    Key Takeaways

    • Adds estate tasting event permit for winegrowers with 36 events/year cap and $100 per event.
    • Permits storage, aging, tastings, and off-site sales for master-branch licenses at the same premises.
    • Requires machine-readable marks at least 1/2 inch and allows chasing arrows inside labels.
    • Extends CRV exemptions to July 1, 2026 for new containers and July 1, 2025 for those labeled.

    Get Involved

    Act Now!

    Email the authors or create an email template to send to all relevant legislators.

    Introduced By

    Chris Rogers
    Chris RogersD
    California State Assembly Member

    Summary

    Assembly Member Rogers advances a package of beverage-policy changes that begins by clarifying licensing boundaries and then expands on off‑premises activities and labeling requirements. The measure clarifies that the storage or topping of wine barrels does not count as production or manufacture, narrowing the scope of activities that may be conducted away from the licensed premises. It also allows a winegrower’s license and a brandy manufacturer’s license held on the same premises—where one license is a master license and the other a branch license—to store, age, conduct tastings, and sell wine for off‑premises consumption.

    A core licensing mechanism grants new flexibility for estate-level activities: a winegrower may apply for an estate tasting event permit that authorizes the winegrower to exercise tasting-room privileges for wine manufactured by or for the winegrower at locations adjacent to the licensed premises or at an adjacent vineyard owned or controlled by the licensee. Each estate tasting event requires department consent in the form of an estate tasting event authorization, which carries an event fee of one hundred dollars and may not exceed 36 events per licensee per calendar year. The estate tasting event permit also carries an annual fee of two hundred dollars and is transferable as part of the winegrower’s license. The licensee must obtain local land-use consent for approved events, and the authorization becomes void if local approval is not granted, with the authorization nonrefundable.

    On the labeling and container-recycling front, the measure would extend and modify redemption-value labeling requirements applicable to beverage containers. It authorizes a beverage manufacturer to etch the required redemption value message on the container and maintains the option to print, emboss, stamp, or affix the required labeling. The department may require machine‑readable markings (such as a scan code, QR code, or UPC), with a minimum size of one‑half inch. In lieu of the text “DEPOSIT,” a chasing arrows symbol may be used inside the machine‑readable label if permitted by related regulations. The bill also extends exemptions for containers that began to fall within the division’s scope on certain dates, delaying labeling requirements to July 1, 2026 (with related exemptions for containers filled and labeled before a specified date), and defines certain containers as “empty” for purposes of the division as of January 1, 2024. In addition, the new labeling framework includes a provision that manufacturers shall self‑certify compliance with criteria provided by the department, rather than requiring department samples for every label approval, while preserving local regulatory latitude over land-use and permitting.

    Implementation and fiscal provisions accompany these changes: fees associated with licenses and renewals would continue to fund the Alcohol Beverage Control Fund, with adjustments governed by an index tied to consumer-price movements and annual publication by the department. The measure also states that no reimbursement to local agencies is required for the costs associated with these changes, aligning with a broader framework that treats administrative costs as funding through the department’s fee structure rather than new state‑local funding obligations. Collectively, the proposals situate license flexibility, consumer-facing tasting opportunities, and modernized labeling within a single policy package, tying industry practices to updated regulatory standards and local review processes while preserving the department’s administrative oversight.

    70% progression
    Bill has passed both houses in identical form and is being prepared for the Governor (9/13/2025)

    Key Dates

    Next Step
    Referred to the Senate Standing Committee on Rules
    Next Step
    Senate Committee
    Referred to the Senate Standing Committee on Rules
    Hearing has not been scheduled yet
    Vote on Assembly Floor
    Assembly Floor
    Vote on Assembly Floor
    AB 720 Rogers Concurrence in Senate Amendments
    Vote on Senate Floor
    Senate Floor
    Vote on Senate Floor
    Assembly 3rd Reading AB720 Rogers By Cabaldon
    Senate Environmental Quality Hearing
    Senate Committee
    Senate Environmental Quality Hearing
    That the measure be returned to Senate Floor for consideration. Ordered to third reading
    Senate Governmental Organization Hearing
    Senate Committee
    Senate Governmental Organization Hearing
    Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]
    Vote on Assembly Floor
    Assembly Floor
    Vote on Assembly Floor
    AB 720 Rogers Consent Calendar Second Day Regular Session
    Assembly Appropriations Hearing
    Assembly Committee
    Assembly Appropriations Hearing
    Do pass. To Consent Calendar
    Assembly Governmental Organization Hearing
    Assembly Committee
    Assembly Governmental Organization Hearing
    Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations] with recommendation: To Consent Calendar
    Introduced
    Assembly Floor
    Introduced
    Read first time. To print.

    Latest Voting History

    View History
    September 13, 2025
    PASS
    Assembly Floor
    Vote on Assembly Floor
    AyesNoesNVRTotalResult
    800080PASS

    Contacts

    Profile
    Shannon GroveR
    Senator
    Committee Member
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    Profile
    Brian JonesR
    Senator
    Committee Member
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    Profile
    Mike McGuireD
    Senator
    Committee Member
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    Profile
    Eloise ReyesD
    Senator
    Committee Member
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    Profile
    John LairdD
    Senator
    Committee Member
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    0 of 6 row(s) selected.
    Page 1 of 2
    Select All Legislators
    Profile
    Shannon GroveR
    Senator
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Brian JonesR
    Senator
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Mike McGuireD
    Senator
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Eloise ReyesD
    Senator
    Committee Member
    Profile
    John LairdD
    Senator
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Chris RogersD
    Assemblymember
    Bill Author

    Similar Past Legislation

    Bill NumberTitleIntroduced DateStatusLink to Bill
    Winegrowers and brandy manufacturers: exercise of privileges: locations.
    January 2021
    Passed
    View Bill
    Winegrowers and brandy manufacturers: exercise of privileges: locations.
    February 2020
    Failed
    View Bill
    Showing 2 of 2 items
    Page 1 of 1