SB-396
Justice & Public Safety

Corrections: supervision.

Introduced
CA
2025-2026 Regular Session
0
0
Track

Key Takeaways

  • Prohibits supervision authorities from banning contact between supervised individuals and their family members.
  • Allows authorities to restrict family contact only if the family member was a victim of the supervised person's crime.
  • Requires written justification when prohibiting contact between a supervised person and their victim family member.
  • Preserves courts' authority to issue protective orders and establish supervision conditions.

Summary

Senator Stern's proposal to modify California's correctional supervision practices would establish new parameters around family contact for individuals under community supervision. The measure prohibits supervision authorities from barring contact between supervised individuals and their family members, except in cases where the family member was a victim of the supervised person's offense and contact restrictions are deemed necessary for public safety.

Under the proposed framework, supervision authorities must provide written justification when prohibiting contact between a supervised person and a victim family member who consents to communication. This documentation must explain how public safety and rehabilitative considerations outweigh familial association rights and potential benefits of maintained contact. The bill defines family members as those related by blood, marriage, adoption, or other legally established family relationships, including foster family connections.

The measure maintains existing court authority to issue criminal protective orders and establish supervision conditions, explicitly excluding courts from the definition of supervision authorities. It applies to individuals under various forms of community supervision, including parole, probation, and mandatory supervision, but does not affect those currently incarcerated. Local agencies implementing these new requirements would be eligible for state reimbursement of associated costs, pending review by the Commission on State Mandates.

Key Dates

Next Step
Referred to the Senate Standing Committee on Appropriations
Next Step
Senate Committee
Referred to the Senate Standing Committee on Appropriations
Hearing has not been scheduled yet
Senate Appropriations Hearing
Senate Committee
Senate Appropriations Hearing
Senate Appropriations Hearing
Senate Public Safety Hearing
Senate Committee
Senate Public Safety Hearing
Senate Public Safety Hearing
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Senate Floor
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Contacts

Profile
Anna CaballeroD
Senator
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Henry SternD
Senator
Bill Author
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Tim GraysonD
Senator
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Megan DahleR
Senator
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Kelly SeyartoR
Senator
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
0 of 8 row(s) selected.
Page 1 of 2
Select All Legislators
Profile
Anna CaballeroD
Senator
Committee Member
Profile
Henry SternD
Senator
Bill Author
Profile
Tim GraysonD
Senator
Committee Member
Profile
Megan DahleR
Senator
Committee Member
Profile
Kelly SeyartoR
Senator
Committee Member
Profile
Aisha WahabD
Senator
Committee Member
Profile
Christopher CabaldonD
Senator
Committee Member
Profile
Laura RichardsonD
Senator
Committee Member

Get Involved

Act Now!

Email the authors or create an email template to send to all relevant legislators.

Introduced By

Henry Stern
Henry SternD
California State Senator
10% progression
Bill has been formally introduced and read for the first time in its house of origin (2/14/2025)

Latest Voting History

April 21, 2025
PASS
Senate Committee
Senate Appropriations Hearing
AyesNoesNVRTotalResult
6017PASS

Key Takeaways

  • Prohibits supervision authorities from banning contact between supervised individuals and their family members.
  • Allows authorities to restrict family contact only if the family member was a victim of the supervised person's crime.
  • Requires written justification when prohibiting contact between a supervised person and their victim family member.
  • Preserves courts' authority to issue protective orders and establish supervision conditions.

Get Involved

Act Now!

Email the authors or create an email template to send to all relevant legislators.

Introduced By

Henry Stern
Henry SternD
California State Senator

Summary

Senator Stern's proposal to modify California's correctional supervision practices would establish new parameters around family contact for individuals under community supervision. The measure prohibits supervision authorities from barring contact between supervised individuals and their family members, except in cases where the family member was a victim of the supervised person's offense and contact restrictions are deemed necessary for public safety.

Under the proposed framework, supervision authorities must provide written justification when prohibiting contact between a supervised person and a victim family member who consents to communication. This documentation must explain how public safety and rehabilitative considerations outweigh familial association rights and potential benefits of maintained contact. The bill defines family members as those related by blood, marriage, adoption, or other legally established family relationships, including foster family connections.

The measure maintains existing court authority to issue criminal protective orders and establish supervision conditions, explicitly excluding courts from the definition of supervision authorities. It applies to individuals under various forms of community supervision, including parole, probation, and mandatory supervision, but does not affect those currently incarcerated. Local agencies implementing these new requirements would be eligible for state reimbursement of associated costs, pending review by the Commission on State Mandates.

10% progression
Bill has been formally introduced and read for the first time in its house of origin (2/14/2025)

Key Dates

Next Step
Referred to the Senate Standing Committee on Appropriations
Next Step
Senate Committee
Referred to the Senate Standing Committee on Appropriations
Hearing has not been scheduled yet
Senate Appropriations Hearing
Senate Committee
Senate Appropriations Hearing
Senate Appropriations Hearing
Senate Public Safety Hearing
Senate Committee
Senate Public Safety Hearing
Senate Public Safety Hearing
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Senate Floor
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Latest Voting History

April 21, 2025
PASS
Senate Committee
Senate Appropriations Hearing
AyesNoesNVRTotalResult
6017PASS

Contacts

Profile
Anna CaballeroD
Senator
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Henry SternD
Senator
Bill Author
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Tim GraysonD
Senator
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Megan DahleR
Senator
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Kelly SeyartoR
Senator
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
0 of 8 row(s) selected.
Page 1 of 2
Select All Legislators
Profile
Anna CaballeroD
Senator
Committee Member
Profile
Henry SternD
Senator
Bill Author
Profile
Tim GraysonD
Senator
Committee Member
Profile
Megan DahleR
Senator
Committee Member
Profile
Kelly SeyartoR
Senator
Committee Member
Profile
Aisha WahabD
Senator
Committee Member
Profile
Christopher CabaldonD
Senator
Committee Member
Profile
Laura RichardsonD
Senator
Committee Member