SB-420
Civil Rights & Liberties

Automated decision systems.

Engrossed
CA
2025-2026 Regular Session
0
0
Track

Key Takeaways

  • Requires developers to assess high-risk AI systems for discrimination before deployment starting January 2026.
  • Mandates companies notify individuals when AI systems are used in decisions affecting their rights or benefits.
  • Establishes penalties up to $25,000 for AI systems that discriminate based on protected characteristics.
  • Prohibits state agencies from contracting AI systems unless certified to comply with civil rights laws.

Summary

Senator Padilla's artificial intelligence regulation bill establishes comprehensive oversight of high-risk automated decision systems in California, requiring impact assessments and governance programs to prevent algorithmic discrimination. The legislation mandates that developers and deployers evaluate AI systems used for critical decisions about education, employment, housing, healthcare and other essential services before implementation.

The bill creates a tiered compliance framework based on organization size and system risk level. Developers must conduct pre-deployment assessments examining potential discriminatory impacts and implement safeguards, while deployers must perform evaluations within two years of system adoption. State agencies can opt out of assessments when using unmodified systems as intended, provided developers meet contract requirements and no discrimination risks are identified.

When automated systems are used to make decisions about individuals, deployers must provide notice explaining the AI's purpose, data usage, and appeal rights. Organizations must maintain public disclosures about their high-risk AI deployments and risk management approaches. The Attorney General and Civil Rights Department can pursue civil penalties ranging from $2,500 to $25,000 per violation, with a 45-day cure period available based on factors like violation intent and entity resources.

The legislation exempts organizations with 50 or fewer employees and systems already approved under equivalent federal standards. It also prohibits state agencies from contracting for high-risk AI systems unless vendors certify compliance with California's civil rights and non-discrimination laws. Impact assessments submitted to oversight agencies remain confidential to protect trade secrets while ensuring accountability.

Key Dates

Next Step
Referred to the Assembly Standing Committee on Privacy and Consumer Protection
Next Step
Assembly Committee
Referred to the Assembly Standing Committee on Privacy and Consumer Protection
Hearing has not been scheduled yet
Vote on Senate Floor
Senate Floor
Vote on Senate Floor
Senate 3rd Reading SB420 Padilla
Senate Appropriations Hearing
Senate Committee
Senate Appropriations Hearing
Do pass as amended
Senate Appropriations Hearing
Senate Committee
Senate Appropriations Hearing
Placed on suspense file
Senate Governmental Organization Hearing
Senate Committee
Senate Governmental Organization Hearing
Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]
Senate Judiciary Hearing
Senate Committee
Senate Judiciary Hearing
Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Governmental Organization]
Introduced
Senate Floor
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Contacts

Profile
Jacqui IrwinD
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Rebecca Bauer-KahanD
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Cottie Petrie-NorrisD
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Buffy WicksD
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Chris WardD
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
0 of 16 row(s) selected.
Page 1 of 4
Select All Legislators
Profile
Jacqui IrwinD
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Profile
Rebecca Bauer-KahanD
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Profile
Cottie Petrie-NorrisD
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Profile
Buffy WicksD
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Profile
Chris WardD
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Profile
Isaac BryanD
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Profile
Lori WilsonD
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Profile
Tina McKinnorD
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Profile
Diane DixonR
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Profile
Joe PattersonR
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Profile
Josh LowenthalD
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Profile
Liz OrtegaD
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Profile
Gail PellerinD
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Profile
Steve PadillaD
Senator
Bill Author
Profile
Carl DeMaioR
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Profile
Alexandra MacedoR
Assemblymember
Committee Member

Get Involved

Act Now!

Email the authors or create an email template to send to all relevant legislators.

Introduced By

Steve Padilla
Steve PadillaD
California State Senator
40% progression
Bill has passed all readings in its first house and is ready to move to the other house (6/2/2025)

Latest Voting History

June 2, 2025
PASS
Senate Floor
Vote on Senate Floor
AyesNoesNVRTotalResult
269540PASS

Key Takeaways

  • Requires developers to assess high-risk AI systems for discrimination before deployment starting January 2026.
  • Mandates companies notify individuals when AI systems are used in decisions affecting their rights or benefits.
  • Establishes penalties up to $25,000 for AI systems that discriminate based on protected characteristics.
  • Prohibits state agencies from contracting AI systems unless certified to comply with civil rights laws.

Get Involved

Act Now!

Email the authors or create an email template to send to all relevant legislators.

Introduced By

Steve Padilla
Steve PadillaD
California State Senator

Summary

Senator Padilla's artificial intelligence regulation bill establishes comprehensive oversight of high-risk automated decision systems in California, requiring impact assessments and governance programs to prevent algorithmic discrimination. The legislation mandates that developers and deployers evaluate AI systems used for critical decisions about education, employment, housing, healthcare and other essential services before implementation.

The bill creates a tiered compliance framework based on organization size and system risk level. Developers must conduct pre-deployment assessments examining potential discriminatory impacts and implement safeguards, while deployers must perform evaluations within two years of system adoption. State agencies can opt out of assessments when using unmodified systems as intended, provided developers meet contract requirements and no discrimination risks are identified.

When automated systems are used to make decisions about individuals, deployers must provide notice explaining the AI's purpose, data usage, and appeal rights. Organizations must maintain public disclosures about their high-risk AI deployments and risk management approaches. The Attorney General and Civil Rights Department can pursue civil penalties ranging from $2,500 to $25,000 per violation, with a 45-day cure period available based on factors like violation intent and entity resources.

The legislation exempts organizations with 50 or fewer employees and systems already approved under equivalent federal standards. It also prohibits state agencies from contracting for high-risk AI systems unless vendors certify compliance with California's civil rights and non-discrimination laws. Impact assessments submitted to oversight agencies remain confidential to protect trade secrets while ensuring accountability.

40% progression
Bill has passed all readings in its first house and is ready to move to the other house (6/2/2025)

Key Dates

Next Step
Referred to the Assembly Standing Committee on Privacy and Consumer Protection
Next Step
Assembly Committee
Referred to the Assembly Standing Committee on Privacy and Consumer Protection
Hearing has not been scheduled yet
Vote on Senate Floor
Senate Floor
Vote on Senate Floor
Senate 3rd Reading SB420 Padilla
Senate Appropriations Hearing
Senate Committee
Senate Appropriations Hearing
Do pass as amended
Senate Appropriations Hearing
Senate Committee
Senate Appropriations Hearing
Placed on suspense file
Senate Governmental Organization Hearing
Senate Committee
Senate Governmental Organization Hearing
Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]
Senate Judiciary Hearing
Senate Committee
Senate Judiciary Hearing
Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Governmental Organization]
Introduced
Senate Floor
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Latest Voting History

June 2, 2025
PASS
Senate Floor
Vote on Senate Floor
AyesNoesNVRTotalResult
269540PASS

Contacts

Profile
Jacqui IrwinD
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Rebecca Bauer-KahanD
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Cottie Petrie-NorrisD
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Buffy WicksD
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Chris WardD
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
0 of 16 row(s) selected.
Page 1 of 4
Select All Legislators
Profile
Jacqui IrwinD
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Profile
Rebecca Bauer-KahanD
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Profile
Cottie Petrie-NorrisD
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Profile
Buffy WicksD
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Profile
Chris WardD
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Profile
Isaac BryanD
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Profile
Lori WilsonD
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Profile
Tina McKinnorD
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Profile
Diane DixonR
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Profile
Joe PattersonR
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Profile
Josh LowenthalD
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Profile
Liz OrtegaD
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Profile
Gail PellerinD
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Profile
Steve PadillaD
Senator
Bill Author
Profile
Carl DeMaioR
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Profile
Alexandra MacedoR
Assemblymember
Committee Member