veeto
Home
Bills
Influence
Feedback
hamburger
    Privacy PolicyResources
    © 2025 Veeto.
    AB-859
    Justice & Public Safety

    Civil Procedure: recovery of defense costs.

    Engrossed
    CA
    ∙
    2025-2026 Regular Session
    0
    0
    Track
    Track

    Key Takeaways

    • Expands the ability of defendants to recover legal costs when opposing parties file cases without good faith.
    • Allows courts to award defense costs when granting demurrer motions that dismiss baseless claims.
    • Requires courts to determine if plaintiffs filed their cases with reasonable cause before awarding costs.
    • Covers attorney fees, expert witness costs, and consulting expenses in defense cost awards.

    Summary

    Assembly Member Macedo's civil procedure reform measure expands defendants' ability to recover legal costs when facing lawsuits filed without merit, adding demurrer objections to the existing framework for defense cost recovery in California civil proceedings.

    Under current law, defendants in Government Claims Act cases and civil actions for indemnity or contribution can petition courts to evaluate whether plaintiffs filed their cases in good faith and with reasonable cause when seeking summary judgment, directed verdict, or similar dispositive motions. The proposed changes would allow courts to make this determination when ruling on demurrers as well. If the court finds the case lacked good faith or reasonable cause, it must order the plaintiff to pay the defendant's reasonable and necessary defense costs, including attorney fees, expert witness fees, and related expenses.

    The measure maintains existing procedural safeguards, requiring defendants to request cost recovery before jury discharge or judgment entry and ensuring plaintiffs receive notice and an opportunity to respond. Parties seeking these costs continue to waive their right to pursue separate malicious prosecution damages, though they retain the ability to file malicious prosecution actions. The provisions apply specifically to cases under the Government Claims Act and civil actions for indemnity or contribution.

    Key Dates

    Next Step
    Referred to the Senate Standing Committee on Appropriations
    Next Step
    Senate Committee
    Referred to the Senate Standing Committee on Appropriations
    Hearing scheduled for , 1021 O Street, Room 2200
    Senate Judiciary Hearing
    Senate Committee
    Senate Judiciary Hearing
    Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations] with the recommendation: To Consent Calendar
    Vote on Assembly Floor
    Assembly Floor
    Vote on Assembly Floor
    AB 859 Macedo Consent Calendar Second Day Regular Session
    Assembly Judiciary Hearing
    Assembly Committee
    Assembly Judiciary Hearing
    Do pass. To Consent Calendar
    Introduced
    Assembly Floor
    Introduced
    Read first time. To print.

    Contacts

    Profile
    Anna CaballeroD
    Senator
    Committee Member
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    Profile
    Tim GraysonD
    Senator
    Committee Member
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    Profile
    Megan DahleR
    Senator
    Committee Member
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    Profile
    Kelly SeyartoR
    Senator
    Committee Member
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    Profile
    Aisha WahabD
    Senator
    Committee Member
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    0 of 8 row(s) selected.
    Page 1 of 2
    Select All Legislators
    Profile
    Anna CaballeroD
    Senator
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Tim GraysonD
    Senator
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Megan DahleR
    Senator
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Kelly SeyartoR
    Senator
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Aisha WahabD
    Senator
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Alexandra MacedoR
    Assemblymember
    Bill Author
    Profile
    Christopher CabaldonD
    Senator
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Laura RichardsonD
    Senator
    Committee Member

    Get Involved

    Act Now!

    Email the authors or create an email template to send to all relevant legislators.

    Introduced By

    Alexandra Macedo
    Alexandra MacedoR
    California State Assembly Member
    40% progression
    Bill has passed all readings in its first house and is ready to move to the other house (4/21/2025)

    Latest Voting History

    View History
    June 24, 2025
    PASS
    Senate Committee
    Senate Judiciary Hearing
    AyesNoesNVRTotalResult
    120113PASS

    Key Takeaways

    • Expands the ability of defendants to recover legal costs when opposing parties file cases without good faith.
    • Allows courts to award defense costs when granting demurrer motions that dismiss baseless claims.
    • Requires courts to determine if plaintiffs filed their cases with reasonable cause before awarding costs.
    • Covers attorney fees, expert witness costs, and consulting expenses in defense cost awards.

    Get Involved

    Act Now!

    Email the authors or create an email template to send to all relevant legislators.

    Introduced By

    Alexandra Macedo
    Alexandra MacedoR
    California State Assembly Member

    Summary

    Assembly Member Macedo's civil procedure reform measure expands defendants' ability to recover legal costs when facing lawsuits filed without merit, adding demurrer objections to the existing framework for defense cost recovery in California civil proceedings.

    Under current law, defendants in Government Claims Act cases and civil actions for indemnity or contribution can petition courts to evaluate whether plaintiffs filed their cases in good faith and with reasonable cause when seeking summary judgment, directed verdict, or similar dispositive motions. The proposed changes would allow courts to make this determination when ruling on demurrers as well. If the court finds the case lacked good faith or reasonable cause, it must order the plaintiff to pay the defendant's reasonable and necessary defense costs, including attorney fees, expert witness fees, and related expenses.

    The measure maintains existing procedural safeguards, requiring defendants to request cost recovery before jury discharge or judgment entry and ensuring plaintiffs receive notice and an opportunity to respond. Parties seeking these costs continue to waive their right to pursue separate malicious prosecution damages, though they retain the ability to file malicious prosecution actions. The provisions apply specifically to cases under the Government Claims Act and civil actions for indemnity or contribution.

    40% progression
    Bill has passed all readings in its first house and is ready to move to the other house (4/21/2025)

    Key Dates

    Next Step
    Referred to the Senate Standing Committee on Appropriations
    Next Step
    Senate Committee
    Referred to the Senate Standing Committee on Appropriations
    Hearing scheduled for , 1021 O Street, Room 2200
    Senate Judiciary Hearing
    Senate Committee
    Senate Judiciary Hearing
    Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations] with the recommendation: To Consent Calendar
    Vote on Assembly Floor
    Assembly Floor
    Vote on Assembly Floor
    AB 859 Macedo Consent Calendar Second Day Regular Session
    Assembly Judiciary Hearing
    Assembly Committee
    Assembly Judiciary Hearing
    Do pass. To Consent Calendar
    Introduced
    Assembly Floor
    Introduced
    Read first time. To print.

    Latest Voting History

    View History
    June 24, 2025
    PASS
    Senate Committee
    Senate Judiciary Hearing
    AyesNoesNVRTotalResult
    120113PASS

    Contacts

    Profile
    Anna CaballeroD
    Senator
    Committee Member
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    Profile
    Tim GraysonD
    Senator
    Committee Member
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    Profile
    Megan DahleR
    Senator
    Committee Member
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    Profile
    Kelly SeyartoR
    Senator
    Committee Member
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    Profile
    Aisha WahabD
    Senator
    Committee Member
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    0 of 8 row(s) selected.
    Page 1 of 2
    Select All Legislators
    Profile
    Anna CaballeroD
    Senator
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Tim GraysonD
    Senator
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Megan DahleR
    Senator
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Kelly SeyartoR
    Senator
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Aisha WahabD
    Senator
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Alexandra MacedoR
    Assemblymember
    Bill Author
    Profile
    Christopher CabaldonD
    Senator
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Laura RichardsonD
    Senator
    Committee Member