veeto
Home
Bills
Feedback
hamburger
    Privacy PolicyResources
    © 2025 Veeto.
    AB-1028
    Education

    Community colleges: temporary employees.

    Enrolled
    CA
    ∙
    2025-2026 Regular Session
    0
    0
    Track
    Track

    Key Takeaways

    • Requires temporary-employee termination to follow local collective bargaining provisions.
    • Maintains end-of-day or end-of-week termination authority and limits judicial review to timing.
    • Reiterates that part-time faculty are temporary and contingent.
    • Creates a framework for mandated-cost reimbursements if costs are found.

    Summary

    As proposed by Assembly Member Fong with coauthor Muratsuchi, the measure ties the termination of temporary employees in California’s community colleges to the procedures found in each district’s local collective bargaining agreements, while reaffirming that part-time faculty assignments are inherently temporary and contingent on enrollment and funding. The core change preserves the authority of a district governing board to terminate a temporary employee at the end of a day or week, but makes the termination process itself subject to the relevant CBA provisions governing temporary-terminations.

    Key mechanisms include requiring that, when a temporary employee is terminated, the procedure conform to the local CBA provisions that pertain to such terminations. In all cases, the bill reiterates that part-time faculty are temporary and contingent, with no guaranteed continuation of employment regardless of status, length of service, or reemployment preference. Additionally, the measure notes that, if the Commission on State Mandates finds costs mandated by the state, reimbursement to local agencies and school districts would follow the standard mandated-cost framework established in state law, creating a state-mandated local program with specified fiscal oversight and potential reimbursement pathways. Disputes about termination procedures would typically be resolved through the CBA’s grievance or arbitration processes, rather than through broad judicial review, which is limited to the timing of termination.

    Looking ahead, districts will need to assess how their CBAs align with the new procedural requirement for temporary-employee terminations and may face increased administrative coordination with unions and HR processes. The policy context centers on local control over employment procedures for temporary staff, balanced with a formal recognition of the contingent nature of part-time faculty work. The fiscal provisions anticipate potential mandated costs and outline the statewide reimbursement mechanism, signaling future interplays between district budgets, bargaining agreements, and state-menerated cost frameworks.

    Key Dates

    Vote on Assembly Floor
    Assembly Floor
    Vote on Assembly Floor
    AB 1028 Fong Concurrence in Senate Amendments
    Vote on Senate Floor
    Senate Floor
    Vote on Senate Floor
    Assembly 3rd Reading AB1028 Fong et al. By Cortese
    Senate Appropriations Hearing
    Senate Committee
    Senate Appropriations Hearing
    Do pass
    Senate Appropriations Hearing
    Senate Committee
    Senate Appropriations Hearing
    Placed on suspense file
    Senate Education Hearing
    Senate Committee
    Senate Education Hearing
    Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]
    Vote on Assembly Floor
    Assembly Floor
    Vote on Assembly Floor
    AB 1028 Fong Assembly Third Reading
    Assembly Appropriations Hearing
    Assembly Committee
    Assembly Appropriations Hearing
    Do pass as amended
    Assembly Higher Education Hearing
    Assembly Committee
    Assembly Higher Education Hearing
    Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]
    Introduced
    Assembly Floor
    Introduced
    Read first time. To print.

    Contacts

    Profile
    Al MuratsuchiD
    Assemblymember
    Bill Author
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    Profile
    Mike FongD
    Assemblymember
    Bill Author
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    0 of 2 row(s) selected.
    Page 1 of 1
    Select All Legislators
    Profile
    Al MuratsuchiD
    Assemblymember
    Bill Author
    Profile
    Mike FongD
    Assemblymember
    Bill Author

    Similar Past Legislation

    Bill NumberTitleIntroduced DateStatusLink to Bill
    Public postsecondary education: community colleges:
    February 2011
    Failed
    View Bill
    California Community Colleges: temporary employees.
    February 2010
    Failed
    View Bill
    Showing 2 of 2 items
    Page 1 of 1

    Get Involved

    Act Now!

    Email the authors or create an email template to send to all relevant legislators.

    Introduced By

    Mike Fong
    Mike FongD
    California State Assembly Member
    Co-Author
    Al Muratsuchi
    Al MuratsuchiD
    California State Assembly Member
    70% progression
    Bill has passed both houses in identical form and is being prepared for the Governor (9/10/2025)

    Latest Voting History

    View History
    September 10, 2025
    PASS
    Assembly Floor
    Vote on Assembly Floor
    AyesNoesNVRTotalResult
    714580PASS

    Key Takeaways

    • Requires temporary-employee termination to follow local collective bargaining provisions.
    • Maintains end-of-day or end-of-week termination authority and limits judicial review to timing.
    • Reiterates that part-time faculty are temporary and contingent.
    • Creates a framework for mandated-cost reimbursements if costs are found.

    Get Involved

    Act Now!

    Email the authors or create an email template to send to all relevant legislators.

    Introduced By

    Mike Fong
    Mike FongD
    California State Assembly Member
    Co-Author
    Al Muratsuchi
    Al MuratsuchiD
    California State Assembly Member

    Summary

    As proposed by Assembly Member Fong with coauthor Muratsuchi, the measure ties the termination of temporary employees in California’s community colleges to the procedures found in each district’s local collective bargaining agreements, while reaffirming that part-time faculty assignments are inherently temporary and contingent on enrollment and funding. The core change preserves the authority of a district governing board to terminate a temporary employee at the end of a day or week, but makes the termination process itself subject to the relevant CBA provisions governing temporary-terminations.

    Key mechanisms include requiring that, when a temporary employee is terminated, the procedure conform to the local CBA provisions that pertain to such terminations. In all cases, the bill reiterates that part-time faculty are temporary and contingent, with no guaranteed continuation of employment regardless of status, length of service, or reemployment preference. Additionally, the measure notes that, if the Commission on State Mandates finds costs mandated by the state, reimbursement to local agencies and school districts would follow the standard mandated-cost framework established in state law, creating a state-mandated local program with specified fiscal oversight and potential reimbursement pathways. Disputes about termination procedures would typically be resolved through the CBA’s grievance or arbitration processes, rather than through broad judicial review, which is limited to the timing of termination.

    Looking ahead, districts will need to assess how their CBAs align with the new procedural requirement for temporary-employee terminations and may face increased administrative coordination with unions and HR processes. The policy context centers on local control over employment procedures for temporary staff, balanced with a formal recognition of the contingent nature of part-time faculty work. The fiscal provisions anticipate potential mandated costs and outline the statewide reimbursement mechanism, signaling future interplays between district budgets, bargaining agreements, and state-menerated cost frameworks.

    70% progression
    Bill has passed both houses in identical form and is being prepared for the Governor (9/10/2025)

    Key Dates

    Vote on Assembly Floor
    Assembly Floor
    Vote on Assembly Floor
    AB 1028 Fong Concurrence in Senate Amendments
    Vote on Senate Floor
    Senate Floor
    Vote on Senate Floor
    Assembly 3rd Reading AB1028 Fong et al. By Cortese
    Senate Appropriations Hearing
    Senate Committee
    Senate Appropriations Hearing
    Do pass
    Senate Appropriations Hearing
    Senate Committee
    Senate Appropriations Hearing
    Placed on suspense file
    Senate Education Hearing
    Senate Committee
    Senate Education Hearing
    Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]
    Vote on Assembly Floor
    Assembly Floor
    Vote on Assembly Floor
    AB 1028 Fong Assembly Third Reading
    Assembly Appropriations Hearing
    Assembly Committee
    Assembly Appropriations Hearing
    Do pass as amended
    Assembly Higher Education Hearing
    Assembly Committee
    Assembly Higher Education Hearing
    Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]
    Introduced
    Assembly Floor
    Introduced
    Read first time. To print.

    Latest Voting History

    View History
    September 10, 2025
    PASS
    Assembly Floor
    Vote on Assembly Floor
    AyesNoesNVRTotalResult
    714580PASS

    Contacts

    Profile
    Al MuratsuchiD
    Assemblymember
    Bill Author
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    Profile
    Mike FongD
    Assemblymember
    Bill Author
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    0 of 2 row(s) selected.
    Page 1 of 1
    Select All Legislators
    Profile
    Al MuratsuchiD
    Assemblymember
    Bill Author
    Profile
    Mike FongD
    Assemblymember
    Bill Author

    Similar Past Legislation

    Bill NumberTitleIntroduced DateStatusLink to Bill
    Public postsecondary education: community colleges:
    February 2011
    Failed
    View Bill
    California Community Colleges: temporary employees.
    February 2010
    Failed
    View Bill
    Showing 2 of 2 items
    Page 1 of 1