AB-1060
Government Operations

Local government: legal fee disclosures.

Introduced
CA
2025-2026 Regular Session
0
0
0
Track

Key Takeaways

  • Requires cities and school districts to publicly disclose legal expenses on their websites every two months.
  • Mandates that legal invoices be shared with governing board members upon request without redaction.
  • Exempts disclosure of legal fees for active litigation and attorney-client privileged information.
  • Aims to prevent wasteful spending on legal services by increasing transparency of public fund usage.
10% progression
Bill has been formally introduced and read for the first time in its house of origin (2/20/2025)
Probability of Passing
We're working on it! Check back later.

Summary

Assembly Member Ávila Farías proposes new transparency requirements for legal fee disclosures by California local governments, responding to concerns about escalating attorney costs that have reached up to $2,000 per hour for some political subdivisions. The legislation mandates that cities, school districts, and community college districts provide unredacted legal invoices to their governing board members upon request and publish bimonthly summaries of legal expenses on their websites.

The bill establishes two primary disclosure mechanisms. First, it requires that all attorney invoices be made available without redaction to requesting members of city councils and district governing boards, with recipients obligated to maintain confidentiality of sensitive information. Second, it mandates that local governments prepare and publicly post bimonthly summaries detailing aggregate legal expenses and identifying retained attorneys or law firms for each matter. The disclosure requirements exempt fees related to pending litigation and information protected by attorney-client privilege.

According to the bill's findings, local governments have spent public funds on legal services without adequate oversight or transparency. The authors cite the City of Santa Monica's expenditure of over $14 million on voting rights litigation while reducing recreation and library services due to budget constraints. The legislation applies to all California cities, including charter cities, as the Legislature determined these provisions address matters of statewide concern rather than municipal affairs.

Get Involved

Act Now!

This bill was recently introduced. Email the authors to let them know what you think about it.

Introduced By

Anamarie Farias
Anamarie FariasD
California State Assembly Member

Community Outlook

No votes yet
Positive
0%
Negative
0%

Latest Voting History

No Voting History Available
N/A
There are currently no voting records for this bill.

Key Dates

Next Step
Referred to the Assembly Standing Committee on Local Government
Next Step
Assembly Committee
Referred to the Assembly Standing Committee on Local Government
Hearing has not been scheduled yet
Read first time. To print.
Assembly Floor
Read first time. To print.
Read first time. To print.

Relevant Contacts

Profile
Blanca RubioD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
James RamosD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Chris WardD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Lori WilsonD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Josh HooverR
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
0 of 10 row(s) selected.
Page 1 of 2
Select All Legislators
Profile
Blanca RubioD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
James RamosD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Chris WardD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Lori WilsonD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Josh HooverR
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Juan CarrilloD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Blanca PachecoD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Tri TaR
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Anamarie FariasD
Assembly Member
Bill Author
Profile
Catherine StefaniD
Assembly Member
Committee Member

Key Takeaways

  • Requires cities and school districts to publicly disclose legal expenses on their websites every two months.
  • Mandates that legal invoices be shared with governing board members upon request without redaction.
  • Exempts disclosure of legal fees for active litigation and attorney-client privileged information.
  • Aims to prevent wasteful spending on legal services by increasing transparency of public fund usage.

Get Involved

Act Now!

This bill was recently introduced. Email the authors to let them know what you think about it.

Introduced By

Anamarie Farias
Anamarie FariasD
California State Assembly Member

Summary

Assembly Member Ávila Farías proposes new transparency requirements for legal fee disclosures by California local governments, responding to concerns about escalating attorney costs that have reached up to $2,000 per hour for some political subdivisions. The legislation mandates that cities, school districts, and community college districts provide unredacted legal invoices to their governing board members upon request and publish bimonthly summaries of legal expenses on their websites.

The bill establishes two primary disclosure mechanisms. First, it requires that all attorney invoices be made available without redaction to requesting members of city councils and district governing boards, with recipients obligated to maintain confidentiality of sensitive information. Second, it mandates that local governments prepare and publicly post bimonthly summaries detailing aggregate legal expenses and identifying retained attorneys or law firms for each matter. The disclosure requirements exempt fees related to pending litigation and information protected by attorney-client privilege.

According to the bill's findings, local governments have spent public funds on legal services without adequate oversight or transparency. The authors cite the City of Santa Monica's expenditure of over $14 million on voting rights litigation while reducing recreation and library services due to budget constraints. The legislation applies to all California cities, including charter cities, as the Legislature determined these provisions address matters of statewide concern rather than municipal affairs.

10% progression
Bill has been formally introduced and read for the first time in its house of origin (2/20/2025)
Probability of Passing
We're working on it! Check back later.

Key Dates

Next Step
Referred to the Assembly Standing Committee on Local Government
Next Step
Assembly Committee
Referred to the Assembly Standing Committee on Local Government
Hearing has not been scheduled yet
Read first time. To print.
Assembly Floor
Read first time. To print.
Read first time. To print.

Community Outlook

No votes yet
Positive
0%
Negative
0%

Latest Voting History

No Voting History Available
N/A
There are currently no voting records for this bill.

Relevant Contacts

Profile
Blanca RubioD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
James RamosD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Chris WardD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Lori WilsonD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Josh HooverR
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
0 of 10 row(s) selected.
Page 1 of 2
Select All Legislators
Profile
Blanca RubioD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
James RamosD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Chris WardD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Lori WilsonD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Josh HooverR
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Juan CarrilloD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Blanca PachecoD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Tri TaR
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Anamarie FariasD
Assembly Member
Bill Author
Profile
Catherine StefaniD
Assembly Member
Committee Member