veeto
Home
Bills
Feedback
hamburger
    Privacy PolicyResources
    © 2025 Veeto.
    AB-1094
    Justice & Public Safety

    Crimes: torture of a minor: parole.

    Enrolled
    CA
    ∙
    2025-2026 Regular Session
    0
    0
    Track
    Track

    Key Takeaways

    • Mandates 10-year parole ineligibility for a narrow torturer subset.
    • Covers offenses on or after 2026 by adults who cared for victims 14 or younger.
    • Preserves life sentence and seven-year baseline for all other torturers.
    • Applies the new standard through the existing parole process.

    Summary

    Assembly Member Bains, with coauthor Assembly Member Alanis, frames a narrowly targeted amendment to torture law that changes the timing of parole eligibility for a specific group of offenders, extending the minimum period before release to ten years for adults who tortured a minor under their care or custody when the victim was 14 or younger, for offenses occurring on or after January 1, 2026, while the baseline penalty of life imprisonment remains unchanged.

    Under the measure, the existing framework keeps torture punishable by life, and the general parole bar remains at seven years for those not meeting the new criteria. The new provision adds a separate eligibility rule applicable only to crimes committed after the 2026 date: if the offender is an adult who had care or custody of a victim aged 14 or younger at the time, parole eligibility is postponed to at least ten years. The change is prospective and does not apply to offenses committed before 2026; the older seven-year rule continues to govern those cases. The measure characterizes the modification as a new sentencing enhancement linked to the parole timeline and includes a standard no-reimbursement statement for local agencies.

    Implementation would flow through the existing parole process, with the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and the Board of Parole Hearings applying the new standard when relevant. Ambiguities identified in the bill’s text include how “care or custody” is defined for purposes of eligibility, whether the age reference pertains strictly to the crime’s timing, and how the rule would operate in cases involving multiple victims or counts. The bill’s fiscal language notes no state reimbursement, though the accompanying digest suggests it may constitute a state-mandated local program. The provision thus affects only offenses after the effective date, with no retroactive impact on past torturers, and it preserves the broader framework for life imprisonment and the seven-year baseline parole period for other torturers.

    Key Dates

    Vote on Assembly Floor
    Assembly Floor
    Vote on Assembly Floor
    AB 1094 Bains Concurrence in Senate Amendments
    Vote on Senate Floor
    Senate Floor
    Vote on Senate Floor
    Assembly 3rd Reading AB1094 Bains et al. By Archuleta
    Senate Appropriations Hearing
    Senate Committee
    Senate Appropriations Hearing
    Do pass as amended
    Senate Appropriations Hearing
    Senate Committee
    Senate Appropriations Hearing
    Placed on suspense file
    Senate Public Safety Hearing
    Senate Committee
    Senate Public Safety Hearing
    Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]
    Vote on Assembly Floor
    Assembly Floor
    Vote on Assembly Floor
    AB 1094 Bains Assembly Third Reading
    Assembly Appropriations Hearing
    Assembly Committee
    Assembly Appropriations Hearing
    Do pass as amended
    Assembly Public Safety Hearing
    Assembly Committee
    Assembly Public Safety Hearing
    Do pass as amended and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]
    Introduced
    Assembly Floor
    Introduced
    Read first time. To print.

    Contacts

    Profile
    Juan AlanisR
    Assemblymember
    Bill Author
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    Profile
    Jasmeet BainsD
    Assemblymember
    Bill Author
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    0 of 2 row(s) selected.
    Page 1 of 1
    Select All Legislators
    Profile
    Juan AlanisR
    Assemblymember
    Bill Author
    Profile
    Jasmeet BainsD
    Assemblymember
    Bill Author

    Get Involved

    Act Now!

    Email the authors or create an email template to send to all relevant legislators.

    Introduced By

    Jasmeet Bains
    Jasmeet BainsD
    California State Assembly Member
    Co-Author
    Juan Alanis
    Juan AlanisR
    California State Assembly Member
    70% progression
    Bill has passed both houses in identical form and is being prepared for the Governor (9/10/2025)

    Latest Voting History

    View History
    September 10, 2025
    PASS
    Assembly Floor
    Vote on Assembly Floor
    AyesNoesNVRTotalResult
    720880PASS

    Key Takeaways

    • Mandates 10-year parole ineligibility for a narrow torturer subset.
    • Covers offenses on or after 2026 by adults who cared for victims 14 or younger.
    • Preserves life sentence and seven-year baseline for all other torturers.
    • Applies the new standard through the existing parole process.

    Get Involved

    Act Now!

    Email the authors or create an email template to send to all relevant legislators.

    Introduced By

    Jasmeet Bains
    Jasmeet BainsD
    California State Assembly Member
    Co-Author
    Juan Alanis
    Juan AlanisR
    California State Assembly Member

    Summary

    Assembly Member Bains, with coauthor Assembly Member Alanis, frames a narrowly targeted amendment to torture law that changes the timing of parole eligibility for a specific group of offenders, extending the minimum period before release to ten years for adults who tortured a minor under their care or custody when the victim was 14 or younger, for offenses occurring on or after January 1, 2026, while the baseline penalty of life imprisonment remains unchanged.

    Under the measure, the existing framework keeps torture punishable by life, and the general parole bar remains at seven years for those not meeting the new criteria. The new provision adds a separate eligibility rule applicable only to crimes committed after the 2026 date: if the offender is an adult who had care or custody of a victim aged 14 or younger at the time, parole eligibility is postponed to at least ten years. The change is prospective and does not apply to offenses committed before 2026; the older seven-year rule continues to govern those cases. The measure characterizes the modification as a new sentencing enhancement linked to the parole timeline and includes a standard no-reimbursement statement for local agencies.

    Implementation would flow through the existing parole process, with the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and the Board of Parole Hearings applying the new standard when relevant. Ambiguities identified in the bill’s text include how “care or custody” is defined for purposes of eligibility, whether the age reference pertains strictly to the crime’s timing, and how the rule would operate in cases involving multiple victims or counts. The bill’s fiscal language notes no state reimbursement, though the accompanying digest suggests it may constitute a state-mandated local program. The provision thus affects only offenses after the effective date, with no retroactive impact on past torturers, and it preserves the broader framework for life imprisonment and the seven-year baseline parole period for other torturers.

    70% progression
    Bill has passed both houses in identical form and is being prepared for the Governor (9/10/2025)

    Key Dates

    Vote on Assembly Floor
    Assembly Floor
    Vote on Assembly Floor
    AB 1094 Bains Concurrence in Senate Amendments
    Vote on Senate Floor
    Senate Floor
    Vote on Senate Floor
    Assembly 3rd Reading AB1094 Bains et al. By Archuleta
    Senate Appropriations Hearing
    Senate Committee
    Senate Appropriations Hearing
    Do pass as amended
    Senate Appropriations Hearing
    Senate Committee
    Senate Appropriations Hearing
    Placed on suspense file
    Senate Public Safety Hearing
    Senate Committee
    Senate Public Safety Hearing
    Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]
    Vote on Assembly Floor
    Assembly Floor
    Vote on Assembly Floor
    AB 1094 Bains Assembly Third Reading
    Assembly Appropriations Hearing
    Assembly Committee
    Assembly Appropriations Hearing
    Do pass as amended
    Assembly Public Safety Hearing
    Assembly Committee
    Assembly Public Safety Hearing
    Do pass as amended and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]
    Introduced
    Assembly Floor
    Introduced
    Read first time. To print.

    Latest Voting History

    View History
    September 10, 2025
    PASS
    Assembly Floor
    Vote on Assembly Floor
    AyesNoesNVRTotalResult
    720880PASS

    Contacts

    Profile
    Juan AlanisR
    Assemblymember
    Bill Author
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    Profile
    Jasmeet BainsD
    Assemblymember
    Bill Author
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    0 of 2 row(s) selected.
    Page 1 of 1
    Select All Legislators
    Profile
    Juan AlanisR
    Assemblymember
    Bill Author
    Profile
    Jasmeet BainsD
    Assemblymember
    Bill Author