veeto
Home
Bills
Influence
Feedback
hamburger
    Privacy Policy
    © 2025 Veeto. All rights reserved.
    AB-1112
    Budget & Economy

    Tax Equity Allocation.

    Introduced
    CA
    ∙
    2025-2026 Regular Session
    0
    0
    Track
    Track

    Key Takeaways

    • Modifies property tax distribution formulas to increase funding for qualifying California cities.
    • Removes certain property tax revenue reductions that previously decreased city allocations.
    • Requires a two-thirds legislative majority for passage due to changes in property tax allocation.
    • Mandates state reimbursement to local agencies for new administrative costs.

    Summary

    Assembly Member Wallis proposes modifying California's Tax Equity Allocation (TEA) formula by removing certain property tax revenue reductions currently applied to qualifying cities' distributions. The legislation alters how county auditors calculate TEA payments by eliminating deductions related to tax revenue exchanges between the City of Rancho Mirage and community services districts.

    The bill maintains the existing TEA framework, under which qualifying cities receive graduated percentage distributions over seven years, starting at 1% and increasing annually to 7% of eligible property tax revenues. County auditors would continue determining city eligibility based on whether their 1988-89 fiscal year property tax allocation was less than 7% of total property tax revenue, after accounting for redevelopment agency adjustments.

    For Santa Clara County specifically, the legislation preserves special provisions enacted in 2006 that require proportional reductions to qualifying cities' allocations to offset impacts on educational funding. These include a five-year phase-out schedule beginning in 2015-16 that decrements the reduction percentage from 80% to zero, except during years when state education funding falls below certain constitutional thresholds.

    The measure requires a two-thirds vote in each legislative chamber, as it would alter local agencies' proportional shares of property tax revenue. If the Commission on State Mandates determines the changes create state-mandated local costs, affected jurisdictions would be eligible for reimbursement through existing statutory mechanisms.

    Key Dates

    Next Step
    Referred to the Assembly Standing Committee on Appropriations
    Next Step
    Assembly Committee
    Referred to the Assembly Standing Committee on Appropriations
    Hearing has not been scheduled yet
    Assembly Local Government Hearing
    Assembly Committee
    Assembly Local Government Hearing
    Assembly Local Government Hearing
    Read first time. To print.
    Assembly Floor
    Read first time. To print.
    Read first time. To print.

    Contacts

    Profile
    Joaquin ArambulaD
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    Profile
    Buffy WicksD
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    Profile
    Lisa CalderonD
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    Profile
    Mike FongD
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    Profile
    Diane DixonR
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    0 of 16 row(s) selected.
    Page 1 of 4
    Select All Legislators
    Profile
    Joaquin ArambulaD
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Buffy WicksD
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Lisa CalderonD
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Mike FongD
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Diane DixonR
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Gregg HartD
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Blanca PachecoD
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Gail PellerinD
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Kate SanchezR
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Tri TaR
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Greg WallisR
    Assemblymember
    Bill Author
    Profile
    Jessica CalozaD
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Mark GonzalezD
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Heather HadwickR
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Jose SolacheD
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Sade ElhawaryD
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member

    Get Involved

    Act Now!

    Email the authors or create an email template to send to all relevant legislators.

    Introduced By

    Greg Wallis
    Greg WallisR
    California State Assembly Member
    10% progression
    Bill has been formally introduced and read for the first time in its house of origin (2/20/2025)

    Latest Voting History

    View History
    April 30, 2025
    PASS
    Assembly Committee
    Assembly Local Government Hearing
    AyesNoesNVRTotalResult
    100010PASS

    Key Takeaways

    • Modifies property tax distribution formulas to increase funding for qualifying California cities.
    • Removes certain property tax revenue reductions that previously decreased city allocations.
    • Requires a two-thirds legislative majority for passage due to changes in property tax allocation.
    • Mandates state reimbursement to local agencies for new administrative costs.

    Get Involved

    Act Now!

    Email the authors or create an email template to send to all relevant legislators.

    Introduced By

    Greg Wallis
    Greg WallisR
    California State Assembly Member

    Summary

    Assembly Member Wallis proposes modifying California's Tax Equity Allocation (TEA) formula by removing certain property tax revenue reductions currently applied to qualifying cities' distributions. The legislation alters how county auditors calculate TEA payments by eliminating deductions related to tax revenue exchanges between the City of Rancho Mirage and community services districts.

    The bill maintains the existing TEA framework, under which qualifying cities receive graduated percentage distributions over seven years, starting at 1% and increasing annually to 7% of eligible property tax revenues. County auditors would continue determining city eligibility based on whether their 1988-89 fiscal year property tax allocation was less than 7% of total property tax revenue, after accounting for redevelopment agency adjustments.

    For Santa Clara County specifically, the legislation preserves special provisions enacted in 2006 that require proportional reductions to qualifying cities' allocations to offset impacts on educational funding. These include a five-year phase-out schedule beginning in 2015-16 that decrements the reduction percentage from 80% to zero, except during years when state education funding falls below certain constitutional thresholds.

    The measure requires a two-thirds vote in each legislative chamber, as it would alter local agencies' proportional shares of property tax revenue. If the Commission on State Mandates determines the changes create state-mandated local costs, affected jurisdictions would be eligible for reimbursement through existing statutory mechanisms.

    10% progression
    Bill has been formally introduced and read for the first time in its house of origin (2/20/2025)

    Key Dates

    Next Step
    Referred to the Assembly Standing Committee on Appropriations
    Next Step
    Assembly Committee
    Referred to the Assembly Standing Committee on Appropriations
    Hearing has not been scheduled yet
    Assembly Local Government Hearing
    Assembly Committee
    Assembly Local Government Hearing
    Assembly Local Government Hearing
    Read first time. To print.
    Assembly Floor
    Read first time. To print.
    Read first time. To print.

    Latest Voting History

    View History
    April 30, 2025
    PASS
    Assembly Committee
    Assembly Local Government Hearing
    AyesNoesNVRTotalResult
    100010PASS

    Contacts

    Profile
    Joaquin ArambulaD
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    Profile
    Buffy WicksD
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    Profile
    Lisa CalderonD
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    Profile
    Mike FongD
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    Profile
    Diane DixonR
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    0 of 16 row(s) selected.
    Page 1 of 4
    Select All Legislators
    Profile
    Joaquin ArambulaD
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Buffy WicksD
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Lisa CalderonD
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Mike FongD
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Diane DixonR
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Gregg HartD
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Blanca PachecoD
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Gail PellerinD
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Kate SanchezR
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Tri TaR
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Greg WallisR
    Assemblymember
    Bill Author
    Profile
    Jessica CalozaD
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Mark GonzalezD
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Heather HadwickR
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Jose SolacheD
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Sade ElhawaryD
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member