Assembly Member Wilson's amendment to California's Education Code explicitly adds sex as a protected characteristic in anti-discrimination provisions governing postsecondary institutions that receive state funding or enroll students with state financial aid.
The measure builds upon existing protections that prohibit discrimination based on disability, nationality, race, ethnicity, religion, sexual orientation, and other characteristics in college and university programs and activities. The amendment aligns the Education Code's anti-discrimination framework with parallel provisions in the Government Code and Penal Code, which address hate crimes and protected classes. Under the revised statute, postsecondary institutions must ensure their non-discrimination policies and compliance protocols specifically address sex-based discrimination alongside other protected characteristics.
The bill requires no state appropriations or additional funding mechanisms for implementation. Postsecondary institutions may need to update relevant policies and training materials to reflect the explicit inclusion of sex as a protected characteristic, though existing administrative frameworks for handling discrimination complaints remain unchanged.
![]() Steven ChoiR Senator | Committee Member | Not Contacted | |
![]() Eloise ReyesD Senator | Committee Member | Not Contacted | |
![]() Lena GonzalezD Senator | Committee Member | Not Contacted | |
![]() Dave CorteseD Senator | Committee Member | Not Contacted | |
![]() Rosilicie Ochoa BoghR Senator | Committee Member | Not Contacted |
Email the authors or create an email template to send to all relevant legislators.
Assembly Member Wilson's amendment to California's Education Code explicitly adds sex as a protected characteristic in anti-discrimination provisions governing postsecondary institutions that receive state funding or enroll students with state financial aid.
The measure builds upon existing protections that prohibit discrimination based on disability, nationality, race, ethnicity, religion, sexual orientation, and other characteristics in college and university programs and activities. The amendment aligns the Education Code's anti-discrimination framework with parallel provisions in the Government Code and Penal Code, which address hate crimes and protected classes. Under the revised statute, postsecondary institutions must ensure their non-discrimination policies and compliance protocols specifically address sex-based discrimination alongside other protected characteristics.
The bill requires no state appropriations or additional funding mechanisms for implementation. Postsecondary institutions may need to update relevant policies and training materials to reflect the explicit inclusion of sex as a protected characteristic, though existing administrative frameworks for handling discrimination complaints remain unchanged.
Ayes | Noes | NVR | Total | Result |
---|---|---|---|---|
58 | 8 | 13 | 79 | PASS |
![]() Steven ChoiR Senator | Committee Member | Not Contacted | |
![]() Eloise ReyesD Senator | Committee Member | Not Contacted | |
![]() Lena GonzalezD Senator | Committee Member | Not Contacted | |
![]() Dave CorteseD Senator | Committee Member | Not Contacted | |
![]() Rosilicie Ochoa BoghR Senator | Committee Member | Not Contacted |