AB-1289
Justice & Public Safety

Juveniles.

Introduced
CA
2025-2026 Regular Session
0
0
Track

Key Takeaways

  • Expands juvenile court supervision rules to cover youth released from secure treatment facilities.
  • Allows youth on probation to live in different counties with local probation officer supervision.
  • Requires youth to follow probation officer instructions or return to their home county for court review.

Summary

Assembly Member Lackey's juvenile justice legislation clarifies California's rules for supervising youth who transition from secure treatment facilities to probation, specifically addressing where these young people may live and who oversees their cases.

The measure expands existing provisions that allow juvenile courts to permit wards to reside outside their county of legal residence. Under current law, when a ward lives in a different county, the probation officer in that county may supervise the youth with their consent. The new legislation explicitly extends these residential and supervisory arrangements to youth who are discharged to probation after confinement in secure treatment facilities or transfer to less restrictive programs.

If a ward fails to comply with their supervising probation officer's instructions, they must return to their legal residence county for additional court proceedings. The juvenile court maintains jurisdiction regardless of where the ward resides. The measure requires only a majority vote for passage and involves no new funding or program requirements.

Key Dates

Next Step
Referred to the Assembly Standing Committee on Public Safety
Next Step
Assembly Committee
Referred to the Assembly Standing Committee on Public Safety
Hearing has not been scheduled yet
Introduced
Assembly Floor
Introduced
Introduced. To print.

Contacts

Profile
Tom LackeyR
Assemblymember
Bill Author
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
James RamosD
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Matt HaneyD
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Juan AlanisR
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Stephanie NguyenD
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
0 of 9 row(s) selected.
Page 1 of 2
Select All Legislators
Profile
Tom LackeyR
Assemblymember
Bill Author
Profile
James RamosD
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Profile
Matt HaneyD
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Profile
Juan AlanisR
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Profile
Stephanie NguyenD
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Profile
Mark GonzalezD
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Profile
John HarabedianD
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Profile
Nick SchultzD
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Profile
LaShae Sharp-CollinsD
Assemblymember
Committee Member

Get Involved

Act Now!

Email the authors or create an email template to send to all relevant legislators.

Introduced By

Tom Lackey
Tom LackeyR
California State Assembly Member
10% progression
Bill has been formally introduced and read for the first time in its house of origin (2/21/2025)

Key Takeaways

  • Expands juvenile court supervision rules to cover youth released from secure treatment facilities.
  • Allows youth on probation to live in different counties with local probation officer supervision.
  • Requires youth to follow probation officer instructions or return to their home county for court review.

Get Involved

Act Now!

Email the authors or create an email template to send to all relevant legislators.

Introduced By

Tom Lackey
Tom LackeyR
California State Assembly Member

Summary

Assembly Member Lackey's juvenile justice legislation clarifies California's rules for supervising youth who transition from secure treatment facilities to probation, specifically addressing where these young people may live and who oversees their cases.

The measure expands existing provisions that allow juvenile courts to permit wards to reside outside their county of legal residence. Under current law, when a ward lives in a different county, the probation officer in that county may supervise the youth with their consent. The new legislation explicitly extends these residential and supervisory arrangements to youth who are discharged to probation after confinement in secure treatment facilities or transfer to less restrictive programs.

If a ward fails to comply with their supervising probation officer's instructions, they must return to their legal residence county for additional court proceedings. The juvenile court maintains jurisdiction regardless of where the ward resides. The measure requires only a majority vote for passage and involves no new funding or program requirements.

10% progression
Bill has been formally introduced and read for the first time in its house of origin (2/21/2025)

Key Dates

Next Step
Referred to the Assembly Standing Committee on Public Safety
Next Step
Assembly Committee
Referred to the Assembly Standing Committee on Public Safety
Hearing has not been scheduled yet
Introduced
Assembly Floor
Introduced
Introduced. To print.

Contacts

Profile
Tom LackeyR
Assemblymember
Bill Author
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
James RamosD
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Matt HaneyD
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Juan AlanisR
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Stephanie NguyenD
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
0 of 9 row(s) selected.
Page 1 of 2
Select All Legislators
Profile
Tom LackeyR
Assemblymember
Bill Author
Profile
James RamosD
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Profile
Matt HaneyD
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Profile
Juan AlanisR
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Profile
Stephanie NguyenD
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Profile
Mark GonzalezD
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Profile
John HarabedianD
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Profile
Nick SchultzD
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Profile
LaShae Sharp-CollinsD
Assemblymember
Committee Member