AB-1317
Justice & Public Safety

Asset forfeiture: human trafficking.

Introduced
CA
2025-2026 Regular Session
0
0
Track

Key Takeaways

  • Expands asset forfeiture laws to cover all human trafficking cases involving commercial sex acts, not just those with minors.
  • Authorizes courts to seize vehicles, property, and assets used in or gained from human trafficking activities.
  • Requires notification to all parties with property interests before asset seizure can proceed.
  • Protects family homes and innocent co-owners from property forfeiture in trafficking cases.

Summary

Assembly Member Nguyen's legislation expands California's asset forfeiture provisions in human trafficking cases, removing the current limitation that applies only to cases involving minors. The bill allows courts to order the forfeiture of vehicles, boats, airplanes, money, securities, real property, and other assets used to facilitate human trafficking involving commercial sex acts, regardless of the victim's age.

The legislation establishes specific procedures for asset seizure and forfeiture while maintaining existing protections for innocent property owners. Courts must provide notice to all parties with potential property interests and hold hearings before issuing seizure orders. The bill preserves exemptions for family residences, properties with uninvolved co-owners, and vehicles that serve as a family's sole means of transportation. When forfeiture is ordered, property holders with valid liens or security interests retain rights to recover their financial stakes through payment arrangements or public auction proceeds.

Under the amended provisions, prosecutors must follow detailed notification requirements when petitioning for forfeiture, including registered mail delivery or newspaper publication when direct notice proves impossible. For real property cases, prosecutors must record a lis pendens to alert potential buyers of pending forfeiture actions. Courts may appoint receivers to manage seized assets and issue temporary restraining orders to prevent property transfers during proceedings. The legislation maintains the current framework for distributing forfeited assets between state and local agencies according to existing statutory formulas.

Key Dates

Next Step
Referred to the Assembly Standing Committee on Public Safety
Next Step
Assembly Committee
Referred to the Assembly Standing Committee on Public Safety
Hearing has not been scheduled yet
Introduced
Assembly Floor
Introduced
Introduced. To print.

Contacts

Profile
Tom LackeyR
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
James RamosD
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Matt HaneyD
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Juan AlanisR
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Stephanie NguyenD
Assemblymember
Bill Author
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
0 of 9 row(s) selected.
Page 1 of 2
Select All Legislators
Profile
Tom LackeyR
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Profile
James RamosD
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Profile
Matt HaneyD
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Profile
Juan AlanisR
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Profile
Stephanie NguyenD
Assemblymember
Bill Author
Profile
Mark GonzalezD
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Profile
John HarabedianD
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Profile
Nick SchultzD
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Profile
LaShae Sharp-CollinsD
Assemblymember
Committee Member

Get Involved

Act Now!

Email the authors or create an email template to send to all relevant legislators.

Introduced By

Stephanie Nguyen
Stephanie NguyenD
California State Assembly Member
10% progression
Bill has been formally introduced and read for the first time in its house of origin (2/21/2025)

Key Takeaways

  • Expands asset forfeiture laws to cover all human trafficking cases involving commercial sex acts, not just those with minors.
  • Authorizes courts to seize vehicles, property, and assets used in or gained from human trafficking activities.
  • Requires notification to all parties with property interests before asset seizure can proceed.
  • Protects family homes and innocent co-owners from property forfeiture in trafficking cases.

Get Involved

Act Now!

Email the authors or create an email template to send to all relevant legislators.

Introduced By

Stephanie Nguyen
Stephanie NguyenD
California State Assembly Member

Summary

Assembly Member Nguyen's legislation expands California's asset forfeiture provisions in human trafficking cases, removing the current limitation that applies only to cases involving minors. The bill allows courts to order the forfeiture of vehicles, boats, airplanes, money, securities, real property, and other assets used to facilitate human trafficking involving commercial sex acts, regardless of the victim's age.

The legislation establishes specific procedures for asset seizure and forfeiture while maintaining existing protections for innocent property owners. Courts must provide notice to all parties with potential property interests and hold hearings before issuing seizure orders. The bill preserves exemptions for family residences, properties with uninvolved co-owners, and vehicles that serve as a family's sole means of transportation. When forfeiture is ordered, property holders with valid liens or security interests retain rights to recover their financial stakes through payment arrangements or public auction proceeds.

Under the amended provisions, prosecutors must follow detailed notification requirements when petitioning for forfeiture, including registered mail delivery or newspaper publication when direct notice proves impossible. For real property cases, prosecutors must record a lis pendens to alert potential buyers of pending forfeiture actions. Courts may appoint receivers to manage seized assets and issue temporary restraining orders to prevent property transfers during proceedings. The legislation maintains the current framework for distributing forfeited assets between state and local agencies according to existing statutory formulas.

10% progression
Bill has been formally introduced and read for the first time in its house of origin (2/21/2025)

Key Dates

Next Step
Referred to the Assembly Standing Committee on Public Safety
Next Step
Assembly Committee
Referred to the Assembly Standing Committee on Public Safety
Hearing has not been scheduled yet
Introduced
Assembly Floor
Introduced
Introduced. To print.

Contacts

Profile
Tom LackeyR
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
James RamosD
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Matt HaneyD
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Juan AlanisR
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Stephanie NguyenD
Assemblymember
Bill Author
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
0 of 9 row(s) selected.
Page 1 of 2
Select All Legislators
Profile
Tom LackeyR
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Profile
James RamosD
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Profile
Matt HaneyD
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Profile
Juan AlanisR
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Profile
Stephanie NguyenD
Assemblymember
Bill Author
Profile
Mark GonzalezD
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Profile
John HarabedianD
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Profile
Nick SchultzD
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Profile
LaShae Sharp-CollinsD
Assemblymember
Committee Member