veeto
Home
Bills
Feedback
hamburger
    Privacy PolicyResources
    © 2025 Veeto.
    AB-1376
    Justice & Public Safety

    Wards: probation.

    Enrolled
    CA
    ∙
    2025-2026 Regular Session
    0
    0
    Track
    Track

    Key Takeaways

    • Limits ward probation to 12 months from the latest disposition, extension possible.
    • Requires a noticed hearing to extend probation on proof by a preponderance of evidence.
    • Removes authority to order a $250 fine or uncompensated work in lieu of restitution.
    • Requires progress reviews at least every six months after extension.

    Summary

    Assembly Member Bonta, joined by Elhawary and Haney, advances a measure that caps the probation period for minors adjudged as wards to 12 months from the most recent disposition hearing, with a framework for limited extensions after a noticed hearing if the ward’s and the public’s interests warrant it and subject to procedural safeguards. The core objective is to align probation practices with a developmentally appropriate, community-based approach, placing emphasis on individualized plans and reducing time under formal supervision when possible, while preserving the court’s authority to tailor conditions.

    Key mechanisms include a required probation-extension process: the court may extend the period after a noticed hearing if the extension is supported by a preponderance of the evidence, the probation agency must file a report detailing the basis for the extension, and the ward and prosecuting attorney must have an opportunity to present relevant evidence. If extended, the court must hold subsequent noticed hearings at least every six months for the remainder of the wardship, and the extension is not available to certain wards in custodial commitments. In all extensions, conditions of probation must be individually tailored, developmentally appropriate, and reasonably related to rehabilitative goals, with progress reviews designed to determine the appropriate timing of termination.

    The measure also revises provisions governing restitution, fines, and community service as conditions of probation. It would remove the court’s authority to impose a fixed $250 fine or require an uncompensated work program in lieu of restitution, while allowing restitution to victims or to property owners under specified circumstances, and permitting community service as an alternative or supplement where appropriate. New or revised sections authorize targeted restitution obligations in offenses such as battery on school property, and they expand mechanisms for cost recovery to public entities in graffiti removal and related cases, including procedures for recovery from minors and, in some instances, parents. The bill adds options such as school-program attendance, parental participation in counseling or education programs, and, in certain cases, graffiti abatement or community service in lieu of other dispositions. It also introduces drug-testing requirements and a potential sex offender treatment component for qualifying offenses, with conditions and cost considerations tied to the minor’s ability to pay. Additionally, the bill contemplates placement options and related safeguards for wards, including potential commitments to specialized facilities, while reaffirming that probationary terms must be proportionate and aligned with broader rehabilitative objectives. The overall framework reinforces a public-health, equity-focused orientation, aiming to minimize the use and duration of probation while expanding access to community resources and protections across youth-serving systems.

    Key Dates

    Vote on Assembly Floor
    Assembly Floor
    Vote on Assembly Floor
    AB 1376 Bonta Concurrence in Senate Amendments
    Vote on Senate Floor
    Senate Floor
    Vote on Senate Floor
    Assembly 3rd Reading AB1376 Bonta et al. By Arreguín
    Senate Appropriations Hearing
    Senate Committee
    Senate Appropriations Hearing
    Do pass as amended
    Senate Appropriations Hearing
    Senate Committee
    Senate Appropriations Hearing
    Placed on suspense file
    Senate Public Safety Hearing
    Senate Committee
    Senate Public Safety Hearing
    Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]
    Vote on Assembly Floor
    Assembly Floor
    Vote on Assembly Floor
    AB 1376 Bonta Assembly Third Reading
    Assembly Public Safety Hearing
    Assembly Committee
    Assembly Public Safety Hearing
    Do pass as amended
    Introduced
    Assembly Floor
    Introduced
    Introduced. To print.

    Contacts

    Profile
    Mia BontaD
    Assemblymember
    Bill Author
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    Profile
    Matt HaneyD
    Assemblymember
    Bill Author
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    Profile
    Sade ElhawaryD
    Assemblymember
    Bill Author
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    0 of 3 row(s) selected.
    Page 1 of 1
    Select All Legislators
    Profile
    Mia BontaD
    Assemblymember
    Bill Author
    Profile
    Matt HaneyD
    Assemblymember
    Bill Author
    Profile
    Sade ElhawaryD
    Assemblymember
    Bill Author

    Similar Past Legislation

    Bill NumberTitleIntroduced DateStatusLink to Bill
    Wards: probation.
    February 2021
    Vetoed
    View Bill
    Wards: probation.
    February 2020
    Failed
    View Bill
    Showing 2 of 2 items
    Page 1 of 1

    Get Involved

    Act Now!

    Email the authors or create an email template to send to all relevant legislators.

    Introduced By

    Mia Bonta
    Mia BontaD
    California State Assembly Member
    Co-Authors
    Sade Elhawary
    Sade ElhawaryD
    California State Assembly Member
    Matt Haney
    Matt HaneyD
    California State Assembly Member
    70% progression
    Bill has passed both houses in identical form and is being prepared for the Governor (9/13/2025)

    Latest Voting History

    View History
    September 13, 2025
    PASS
    Assembly Floor
    Vote on Assembly Floor
    AyesNoesNVRTotalResult
    48211180PASS

    Key Takeaways

    • Limits ward probation to 12 months from the latest disposition, extension possible.
    • Requires a noticed hearing to extend probation on proof by a preponderance of evidence.
    • Removes authority to order a $250 fine or uncompensated work in lieu of restitution.
    • Requires progress reviews at least every six months after extension.

    Get Involved

    Act Now!

    Email the authors or create an email template to send to all relevant legislators.

    Introduced By

    Mia Bonta
    Mia BontaD
    California State Assembly Member
    Co-Authors
    Sade Elhawary
    Sade ElhawaryD
    California State Assembly Member
    Matt Haney
    Matt HaneyD
    California State Assembly Member

    Summary

    Assembly Member Bonta, joined by Elhawary and Haney, advances a measure that caps the probation period for minors adjudged as wards to 12 months from the most recent disposition hearing, with a framework for limited extensions after a noticed hearing if the ward’s and the public’s interests warrant it and subject to procedural safeguards. The core objective is to align probation practices with a developmentally appropriate, community-based approach, placing emphasis on individualized plans and reducing time under formal supervision when possible, while preserving the court’s authority to tailor conditions.

    Key mechanisms include a required probation-extension process: the court may extend the period after a noticed hearing if the extension is supported by a preponderance of the evidence, the probation agency must file a report detailing the basis for the extension, and the ward and prosecuting attorney must have an opportunity to present relevant evidence. If extended, the court must hold subsequent noticed hearings at least every six months for the remainder of the wardship, and the extension is not available to certain wards in custodial commitments. In all extensions, conditions of probation must be individually tailored, developmentally appropriate, and reasonably related to rehabilitative goals, with progress reviews designed to determine the appropriate timing of termination.

    The measure also revises provisions governing restitution, fines, and community service as conditions of probation. It would remove the court’s authority to impose a fixed $250 fine or require an uncompensated work program in lieu of restitution, while allowing restitution to victims or to property owners under specified circumstances, and permitting community service as an alternative or supplement where appropriate. New or revised sections authorize targeted restitution obligations in offenses such as battery on school property, and they expand mechanisms for cost recovery to public entities in graffiti removal and related cases, including procedures for recovery from minors and, in some instances, parents. The bill adds options such as school-program attendance, parental participation in counseling or education programs, and, in certain cases, graffiti abatement or community service in lieu of other dispositions. It also introduces drug-testing requirements and a potential sex offender treatment component for qualifying offenses, with conditions and cost considerations tied to the minor’s ability to pay. Additionally, the bill contemplates placement options and related safeguards for wards, including potential commitments to specialized facilities, while reaffirming that probationary terms must be proportionate and aligned with broader rehabilitative objectives. The overall framework reinforces a public-health, equity-focused orientation, aiming to minimize the use and duration of probation while expanding access to community resources and protections across youth-serving systems.

    70% progression
    Bill has passed both houses in identical form and is being prepared for the Governor (9/13/2025)

    Key Dates

    Vote on Assembly Floor
    Assembly Floor
    Vote on Assembly Floor
    AB 1376 Bonta Concurrence in Senate Amendments
    Vote on Senate Floor
    Senate Floor
    Vote on Senate Floor
    Assembly 3rd Reading AB1376 Bonta et al. By Arreguín
    Senate Appropriations Hearing
    Senate Committee
    Senate Appropriations Hearing
    Do pass as amended
    Senate Appropriations Hearing
    Senate Committee
    Senate Appropriations Hearing
    Placed on suspense file
    Senate Public Safety Hearing
    Senate Committee
    Senate Public Safety Hearing
    Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]
    Vote on Assembly Floor
    Assembly Floor
    Vote on Assembly Floor
    AB 1376 Bonta Assembly Third Reading
    Assembly Public Safety Hearing
    Assembly Committee
    Assembly Public Safety Hearing
    Do pass as amended
    Introduced
    Assembly Floor
    Introduced
    Introduced. To print.

    Latest Voting History

    View History
    September 13, 2025
    PASS
    Assembly Floor
    Vote on Assembly Floor
    AyesNoesNVRTotalResult
    48211180PASS

    Contacts

    Profile
    Mia BontaD
    Assemblymember
    Bill Author
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    Profile
    Matt HaneyD
    Assemblymember
    Bill Author
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    Profile
    Sade ElhawaryD
    Assemblymember
    Bill Author
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    0 of 3 row(s) selected.
    Page 1 of 1
    Select All Legislators
    Profile
    Mia BontaD
    Assemblymember
    Bill Author
    Profile
    Matt HaneyD
    Assemblymember
    Bill Author
    Profile
    Sade ElhawaryD
    Assemblymember
    Bill Author

    Similar Past Legislation

    Bill NumberTitleIntroduced DateStatusLink to Bill
    Wards: probation.
    February 2021
    Vetoed
    View Bill
    Wards: probation.
    February 2020
    Failed
    View Bill
    Showing 2 of 2 items
    Page 1 of 1