veeto
Home
Bills
Feedback
hamburger
    Privacy PolicyResources
    © 2025 Veeto.
    AB-1421
    Infrastructure

    Vehicles: Road Usage Charge Technical Advisory Committee.

    Introduced
    CA
    ∙
    2025-2026 Regular Session
    0
    0
    Track
    Track

    Key Takeaways

    • Extends California's road usage charge pilot program through January 1, 2035 to evaluate mileage-based fees.
    • Addresses projected $4 billion annual decline in gas tax revenue due to increasing electric vehicle adoption.
    • Continues testing payment systems that could provide gas tax relief for low-income drivers.
    • Requires additional engagement with rural communities and tribal nations on road charge implementation.

    Summary

    Assembly Member Wilson's proposal to extend California's road usage charge pilot program through 2035 comes as the state grapples with projected declines in gas tax revenue due to increasing electric vehicle adoption. The legislation would allow continued evaluation of mileage-based fees as an alternative to traditional fuel taxes, building on a 2017 pilot that tracked over 37 million miles across more than 5,000 vehicles.

    The bill maintains the existing Road Usage Charge Technical Advisory Committee's mandate to assess mileage-based revenue collection methods. According to the bill's findings, California currently generates approximately $14 billion annually from fuel taxes and vehicle fees, with the 57.9-cent per gallon gasoline excise tax accounting for $7.8 billion in fiscal year 2023-24. However, the Legislative Analyst's Office projects these revenues could decrease by up to $2 billion annually by 2030 and $4 billion by 2035 as more drivers switch to electric vehicles. The California Transportation Commission estimates $31.3 billion less in fuel excise tax revenue over the next decade due to increased fuel efficiency and zero-emission vehicle adoption.

    The extension allows for continued analysis of how road usage charges could affect different driver populations, including rural residents, tribal nations, and super-commuters. The bill's findings note that implementing such a system would require extensive public engagement to address the needs of both urban and rural communities across California's diverse geography. The current pilot program simulates revenue collection through mock invoices and payments, with the advisory committee's final report recommending further testing of actual revenue collection processes to evaluate practical implementation challenges.

    Key Dates

    Next Step
    Referred to the Assembly Standing Committee on Transportation
    Next Step
    Assembly Committee
    Referred to the Assembly Standing Committee on Transportation
    Hearing has not been scheduled yet
    Introduced
    Assembly Floor
    Introduced
    Introduced. To print.

    Contacts

    Profile
    Tom LackeyR
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    Profile
    Cecilia Aguiar-CurryD
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    Profile
    Laurie DaviesR
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    Profile
    Chris WardD
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    Profile
    Lori WilsonD
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    0 of 16 row(s) selected.
    Page 1 of 4
    Select All Legislators
    Profile
    Tom LackeyR
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Cecilia Aguiar-CurryD
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Laurie DaviesR
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Chris WardD
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Lori WilsonD
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Gregg HartD
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Josh HooverR
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Corey JacksonD
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Juan CarrilloD
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Josh LowenthalD
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Diane PapanD
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Patrick AhrensD
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Profile
    John HarabedianD
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Alexandra MacedoR
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Rhodesia RansomD
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Chris RogersD
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member

    Get Involved

    Act Now!

    Email the authors or create an email template to send to all relevant legislators.

    Introduced By

    Lori Wilson
    Lori WilsonD
    California State Assembly Member
    10% progression
    Bill has been formally introduced and read for the first time in its house of origin (2/21/2025)

    Key Takeaways

    • Extends California's road usage charge pilot program through January 1, 2035 to evaluate mileage-based fees.
    • Addresses projected $4 billion annual decline in gas tax revenue due to increasing electric vehicle adoption.
    • Continues testing payment systems that could provide gas tax relief for low-income drivers.
    • Requires additional engagement with rural communities and tribal nations on road charge implementation.

    Get Involved

    Act Now!

    Email the authors or create an email template to send to all relevant legislators.

    Introduced By

    Lori Wilson
    Lori WilsonD
    California State Assembly Member

    Summary

    Assembly Member Wilson's proposal to extend California's road usage charge pilot program through 2035 comes as the state grapples with projected declines in gas tax revenue due to increasing electric vehicle adoption. The legislation would allow continued evaluation of mileage-based fees as an alternative to traditional fuel taxes, building on a 2017 pilot that tracked over 37 million miles across more than 5,000 vehicles.

    The bill maintains the existing Road Usage Charge Technical Advisory Committee's mandate to assess mileage-based revenue collection methods. According to the bill's findings, California currently generates approximately $14 billion annually from fuel taxes and vehicle fees, with the 57.9-cent per gallon gasoline excise tax accounting for $7.8 billion in fiscal year 2023-24. However, the Legislative Analyst's Office projects these revenues could decrease by up to $2 billion annually by 2030 and $4 billion by 2035 as more drivers switch to electric vehicles. The California Transportation Commission estimates $31.3 billion less in fuel excise tax revenue over the next decade due to increased fuel efficiency and zero-emission vehicle adoption.

    The extension allows for continued analysis of how road usage charges could affect different driver populations, including rural residents, tribal nations, and super-commuters. The bill's findings note that implementing such a system would require extensive public engagement to address the needs of both urban and rural communities across California's diverse geography. The current pilot program simulates revenue collection through mock invoices and payments, with the advisory committee's final report recommending further testing of actual revenue collection processes to evaluate practical implementation challenges.

    10% progression
    Bill has been formally introduced and read for the first time in its house of origin (2/21/2025)

    Key Dates

    Next Step
    Referred to the Assembly Standing Committee on Transportation
    Next Step
    Assembly Committee
    Referred to the Assembly Standing Committee on Transportation
    Hearing has not been scheduled yet
    Introduced
    Assembly Floor
    Introduced
    Introduced. To print.

    Contacts

    Profile
    Tom LackeyR
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    Profile
    Cecilia Aguiar-CurryD
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    Profile
    Laurie DaviesR
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    Profile
    Chris WardD
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    Profile
    Lori WilsonD
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Not Contacted
    Not Contacted
    0 of 16 row(s) selected.
    Page 1 of 4
    Select All Legislators
    Profile
    Tom LackeyR
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Cecilia Aguiar-CurryD
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Laurie DaviesR
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Chris WardD
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Lori WilsonD
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Gregg HartD
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Josh HooverR
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Corey JacksonD
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Juan CarrilloD
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Josh LowenthalD
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Diane PapanD
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Patrick AhrensD
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Profile
    John HarabedianD
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Alexandra MacedoR
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Rhodesia RansomD
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member
    Profile
    Chris RogersD
    Assemblymember
    Committee Member