AB-1493
Education

Charter schools: performance standards for renewal.

Introduced
CA
2025-2026 Regular Session
0
0
Track

Key Takeaways

  • Modifies charter school renewal standards to require evidence of academic improvement or strong college outcomes.
  • Requires use of verified data for evaluating low-performing charter schools until new growth models are ready.
  • Authorizes two-year renewals for struggling schools and five-year terms for higher-performing charters.
  • Mandates state reimbursement to local agencies for costs of implementing these new requirements.

Summary

Assembly Member Ávila Farías proposes modifying California's charter school renewal process through legislation that revises how chartering authorities evaluate lower-performing schools. The measure adjusts current requirements, which mandate consideration of academic achievement increases and postsecondary outcomes until January 2026, by extending this evaluation approach until the state fully implements its student-level growth model for English language arts and mathematics.

Under the proposal, chartering authorities must continue examining verified data - defined as information from nationally recognized, peer-reviewed sources approved by the State Board of Education - when assessing renewal applications from schools in the two lowest performance tiers. Schools seeking renewal must demonstrate they are addressing underlying performance issues and provide clear evidence of either measurable academic improvements or strong postsecondary outcomes compared to peer institutions. The bill maintains existing renewal terms of two years for lower-performing schools and five years for others.

The legislation includes provisions for reimbursing local educational agencies for any additional costs imposed by these changes, subject to review by the Commission on State Mandates. This maintains compliance with constitutional requirements regarding state-mandated local programs while establishing an implementation framework that bridges current practices with future assessment models.

Key Dates

Next Step
Referred to the Assembly Standing Committee on Education
Next Step
Assembly Committee
Referred to the Assembly Standing Committee on Education
Hearing has not been scheduled yet
Assembly Education Hearing
Assembly Committee
Assembly Education Hearing
Assembly Education Hearing
Assembly Education Hearing
Assembly Committee
Assembly Education Hearing
Assembly Education Hearing
Introduced. To print.
Assembly Floor
Introduced. To print.
Introduced. To print.

Contacts

Profile
Al MuratsuchiD
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Mia BontaD
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
David AlvarezD
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Dawn AddisD
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Josh HooverR
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
0 of 10 row(s) selected.
Page 1 of 2
Select All Legislators
Profile
Al MuratsuchiD
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Profile
Mia BontaD
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Profile
David AlvarezD
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Profile
Dawn AddisD
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Profile
Josh HooverR
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Profile
Josh LowenthalD
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Profile
Leticia CastilloR
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Profile
Anamarie FariasD
Assemblymember
Bill Author
Profile
Robert GarciaD
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Profile
Darshana PatelD
Assemblymember
Committee Member

Get Involved

Act Now!

Email the authors or create an email template to send to all relevant legislators.

Introduced By

Anamarie Farias
Anamarie FariasD
California State Assembly Member
10% progression
Bill has been formally introduced and read for the first time in its house of origin (2/21/2025)

Latest Voting History

Invalid DateTime
PASS
Assembly Committee
Assembly Education Hearing
AyesNoesNVRTotalResult
9009PASS

Key Takeaways

  • Modifies charter school renewal standards to require evidence of academic improvement or strong college outcomes.
  • Requires use of verified data for evaluating low-performing charter schools until new growth models are ready.
  • Authorizes two-year renewals for struggling schools and five-year terms for higher-performing charters.
  • Mandates state reimbursement to local agencies for costs of implementing these new requirements.

Get Involved

Act Now!

Email the authors or create an email template to send to all relevant legislators.

Introduced By

Anamarie Farias
Anamarie FariasD
California State Assembly Member

Summary

Assembly Member Ávila Farías proposes modifying California's charter school renewal process through legislation that revises how chartering authorities evaluate lower-performing schools. The measure adjusts current requirements, which mandate consideration of academic achievement increases and postsecondary outcomes until January 2026, by extending this evaluation approach until the state fully implements its student-level growth model for English language arts and mathematics.

Under the proposal, chartering authorities must continue examining verified data - defined as information from nationally recognized, peer-reviewed sources approved by the State Board of Education - when assessing renewal applications from schools in the two lowest performance tiers. Schools seeking renewal must demonstrate they are addressing underlying performance issues and provide clear evidence of either measurable academic improvements or strong postsecondary outcomes compared to peer institutions. The bill maintains existing renewal terms of two years for lower-performing schools and five years for others.

The legislation includes provisions for reimbursing local educational agencies for any additional costs imposed by these changes, subject to review by the Commission on State Mandates. This maintains compliance with constitutional requirements regarding state-mandated local programs while establishing an implementation framework that bridges current practices with future assessment models.

10% progression
Bill has been formally introduced and read for the first time in its house of origin (2/21/2025)

Key Dates

Next Step
Referred to the Assembly Standing Committee on Education
Next Step
Assembly Committee
Referred to the Assembly Standing Committee on Education
Hearing has not been scheduled yet
Assembly Education Hearing
Assembly Committee
Assembly Education Hearing
Assembly Education Hearing
Assembly Education Hearing
Assembly Committee
Assembly Education Hearing
Assembly Education Hearing
Introduced. To print.
Assembly Floor
Introduced. To print.
Introduced. To print.

Latest Voting History

Invalid DateTime
PASS
Assembly Committee
Assembly Education Hearing
AyesNoesNVRTotalResult
9009PASS

Contacts

Profile
Al MuratsuchiD
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Mia BontaD
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
David AlvarezD
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Dawn AddisD
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Josh HooverR
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
0 of 10 row(s) selected.
Page 1 of 2
Select All Legislators
Profile
Al MuratsuchiD
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Profile
Mia BontaD
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Profile
David AlvarezD
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Profile
Dawn AddisD
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Profile
Josh HooverR
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Profile
Josh LowenthalD
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Profile
Leticia CastilloR
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Profile
Anamarie FariasD
Assemblymember
Bill Author
Profile
Robert GarciaD
Assemblymember
Committee Member
Profile
Darshana PatelD
Assemblymember
Committee Member