SB-813
Technology & Innovation

Multistakeholder regulatory organizations.

Introduced
CA
2025-2026 Regular Session
0
0
Track

Key Takeaways

  • Establishes private regulatory organizations to certify and monitor the safety of artificial intelligence systems in California.
  • Requires AI developers to meet safety standards and best practices to receive certification from designated organizations.
  • Provides legal protection to certified AI developers in civil lawsuits through a rebuttable presumption of reasonable care.
  • Mandates annual audits and reporting on AI risks, benefits, and compliance to ensure ongoing safety and transparency.

Summary

Senator McNerney's proposal to establish Multistakeholder Regulatory Organizations (MROs) creates a new framework for certifying artificial intelligence models and applications in California. Under the legislation, the Attorney General would designate private entities as MROs for three-year renewable terms to evaluate AI systems' compliance with safety standards and best practices.

The bill requires MRO applicants to submit detailed plans addressing risk mitigation across areas including cybersecurity, biological threats, and AI model autonomy. These plans must outline approaches for auditing AI systems, ensuring developer disclosure of incidents, specifying certification parameters, and collecting evaluation data. MROs would be required to maintain independence from the AI industry through annual audits of their board composition, funding sources, and available resources.

Once designated, MROs would certify qualifying AI models and applications while decertifying those failing to meet requirements. The organizations must submit annual reports to the Legislature and Attorney General detailing AI capabilities, observed and potential risks, certification assessments, and prescribed remedial measures. The bill also establishes a rebuttable presumption in civil cases that developers exercised reasonable care if their AI system was MRO-certified when alleged injuries occurred. The Attorney General retains authority to revoke MRO designations for issues like misleading plans, compromised independence, or significant harms caused by certified systems.

Key Dates

Next Step
Referred to the Senate Standing Committee on Appropriations
Next Step
Senate Committee
Referred to the Senate Standing Committee on Appropriations
Hearing has not been scheduled yet
Senate Appropriations Hearing
Senate Committee
Senate Appropriations Hearing
Placed on suspense file
Senate Judiciary Hearing
Senate Committee
Senate Judiciary Hearing
Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to the Committee on [Appropriations]
Introduced
Senate Floor
Introduced
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Contacts

Profile
Anna CaballeroD
Senator
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Tim GraysonD
Senator
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Megan DahleR
Senator
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Kelly SeyartoR
Senator
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Aisha WahabD
Senator
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
0 of 8 row(s) selected.
Page 1 of 2
Select All Legislators
Profile
Anna CaballeroD
Senator
Committee Member
Profile
Tim GraysonD
Senator
Committee Member
Profile
Megan DahleR
Senator
Committee Member
Profile
Kelly SeyartoR
Senator
Committee Member
Profile
Aisha WahabD
Senator
Committee Member
Profile
Christopher CabaldonD
Senator
Committee Member
Profile
Jerry McNerneyD
Senator
Bill Author
Profile
Laura RichardsonD
Senator
Committee Member

Get Involved

Act Now!

Email the authors or create an email template to send to all relevant legislators.

Introduced By

Jerry McNerney
Jerry McNerneyD
California State Senator
10% progression
Bill has been formally introduced and read for the first time in its house of origin (2/21/2025)

Latest Voting History

May 12, 2025
PASS
Senate Committee
Senate Appropriations Hearing
AyesNoesNVRTotalResult
7007PASS

Key Takeaways

  • Establishes private regulatory organizations to certify and monitor the safety of artificial intelligence systems in California.
  • Requires AI developers to meet safety standards and best practices to receive certification from designated organizations.
  • Provides legal protection to certified AI developers in civil lawsuits through a rebuttable presumption of reasonable care.
  • Mandates annual audits and reporting on AI risks, benefits, and compliance to ensure ongoing safety and transparency.

Get Involved

Act Now!

Email the authors or create an email template to send to all relevant legislators.

Introduced By

Jerry McNerney
Jerry McNerneyD
California State Senator

Summary

Senator McNerney's proposal to establish Multistakeholder Regulatory Organizations (MROs) creates a new framework for certifying artificial intelligence models and applications in California. Under the legislation, the Attorney General would designate private entities as MROs for three-year renewable terms to evaluate AI systems' compliance with safety standards and best practices.

The bill requires MRO applicants to submit detailed plans addressing risk mitigation across areas including cybersecurity, biological threats, and AI model autonomy. These plans must outline approaches for auditing AI systems, ensuring developer disclosure of incidents, specifying certification parameters, and collecting evaluation data. MROs would be required to maintain independence from the AI industry through annual audits of their board composition, funding sources, and available resources.

Once designated, MROs would certify qualifying AI models and applications while decertifying those failing to meet requirements. The organizations must submit annual reports to the Legislature and Attorney General detailing AI capabilities, observed and potential risks, certification assessments, and prescribed remedial measures. The bill also establishes a rebuttable presumption in civil cases that developers exercised reasonable care if their AI system was MRO-certified when alleged injuries occurred. The Attorney General retains authority to revoke MRO designations for issues like misleading plans, compromised independence, or significant harms caused by certified systems.

10% progression
Bill has been formally introduced and read for the first time in its house of origin (2/21/2025)

Key Dates

Next Step
Referred to the Senate Standing Committee on Appropriations
Next Step
Senate Committee
Referred to the Senate Standing Committee on Appropriations
Hearing has not been scheduled yet
Senate Appropriations Hearing
Senate Committee
Senate Appropriations Hearing
Placed on suspense file
Senate Judiciary Hearing
Senate Committee
Senate Judiciary Hearing
Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to the Committee on [Appropriations]
Introduced
Senate Floor
Introduced
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Latest Voting History

May 12, 2025
PASS
Senate Committee
Senate Appropriations Hearing
AyesNoesNVRTotalResult
7007PASS

Contacts

Profile
Anna CaballeroD
Senator
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Tim GraysonD
Senator
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Megan DahleR
Senator
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Kelly SeyartoR
Senator
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Aisha WahabD
Senator
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
0 of 8 row(s) selected.
Page 1 of 2
Select All Legislators
Profile
Anna CaballeroD
Senator
Committee Member
Profile
Tim GraysonD
Senator
Committee Member
Profile
Megan DahleR
Senator
Committee Member
Profile
Kelly SeyartoR
Senator
Committee Member
Profile
Aisha WahabD
Senator
Committee Member
Profile
Christopher CabaldonD
Senator
Committee Member
Profile
Jerry McNerneyD
Senator
Bill Author
Profile
Laura RichardsonD
Senator
Committee Member