AB-1522
Labor & Employment

State Bar Act: expedited licensure: federal attorneys.

Introduced
CA
2025-2026 Regular Session
0
0
Track

Key Takeaways

  • Creates a fast-track licensing process for federal attorneys to practice law in California without taking the bar exam.
  • Allows experienced out-of-state attorneys to bypass the California bar exam after four years of good standing.
  • Protects attorneys from discipline for actions legal in California but prohibited in other states.
  • Requires the State Bar to develop expedited licensing procedures by January 2026.

Summary

The California Assembly Judiciary Committee has put forward comprehensive changes to attorney licensure requirements, creating new pathways for experienced out-of-state lawyers to practice in California while establishing protections related to cross-jurisdictional disciplinary actions.

Under the proposed modifications, attorneys licensed and in good standing in other U.S. jurisdictions for at least four years may qualify for admission to the California bar through alternative means, rather than being required to take the standard bar examination. The bill directs the State Bar to develop an expedited licensing process specifically for federal government attorneys who were employed as of January 20, 2025, have four years of practice experience, maintain clean disciplinary records, and can obtain an attestation of competence from a California attorney.

The legislation also addresses interstate disciplinary matters by establishing "excluded events" - actions taken in other states related to services that would be legal in California. These events, which include civil judgments, judicial sanctions, criminal charges, and professional discipline, cannot serve as grounds for California disciplinary action or bar admission denial. The measure includes an urgency clause citing the need to rapidly fill critical legal positions, particularly in public defender offices, with qualified federal attorneys.

Key Dates

Next Step
Referred to the Assembly Standing Committee on Judiciary
Next Step
Assembly Committee
Referred to the Assembly Standing Committee on Judiciary
Hearing has not been scheduled yet
Assembly Judiciary Hearing
Assembly Committee
Assembly Judiciary Hearing
Assembly Judiciary Hearing
Read first time. To print.
Assembly Floor
Read first time. To print.
Read first time. To print.

Contacts

Profile
Ash KalraD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Rebecca Bauer-KahanD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Isaac BryanD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Damon ConnollyD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Diane DixonR
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
0 of 12 row(s) selected.
Page 1 of 3
Select All Legislators
Profile
Ash KalraD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Rebecca Bauer-KahanD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Isaac BryanD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Damon ConnollyD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Diane DixonR
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Bill EssayliR
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Blanca PachecoD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Diane PapanD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Kate SanchezR
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Rick ZburD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
John HarabedianD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Catherine StefaniD
Assembly Member
Committee Member

Get Involved

Act Now!

Email the authors or create an email template to send to all relevant legislators.

Introduced By

10% progression
Bill has been formally introduced and read for the first time in its house of origin (3/18/2025)

Latest Voting History

April 22, 2025
PASS
Assembly Committee
Assembly Judiciary Hearing
AyesNoesNVRTotalResult
93012PASS

Key Takeaways

  • Creates a fast-track licensing process for federal attorneys to practice law in California without taking the bar exam.
  • Allows experienced out-of-state attorneys to bypass the California bar exam after four years of good standing.
  • Protects attorneys from discipline for actions legal in California but prohibited in other states.
  • Requires the State Bar to develop expedited licensing procedures by January 2026.

Get Involved

Act Now!

Email the authors or create an email template to send to all relevant legislators.

Introduced By

Summary

The California Assembly Judiciary Committee has put forward comprehensive changes to attorney licensure requirements, creating new pathways for experienced out-of-state lawyers to practice in California while establishing protections related to cross-jurisdictional disciplinary actions.

Under the proposed modifications, attorneys licensed and in good standing in other U.S. jurisdictions for at least four years may qualify for admission to the California bar through alternative means, rather than being required to take the standard bar examination. The bill directs the State Bar to develop an expedited licensing process specifically for federal government attorneys who were employed as of January 20, 2025, have four years of practice experience, maintain clean disciplinary records, and can obtain an attestation of competence from a California attorney.

The legislation also addresses interstate disciplinary matters by establishing "excluded events" - actions taken in other states related to services that would be legal in California. These events, which include civil judgments, judicial sanctions, criminal charges, and professional discipline, cannot serve as grounds for California disciplinary action or bar admission denial. The measure includes an urgency clause citing the need to rapidly fill critical legal positions, particularly in public defender offices, with qualified federal attorneys.

10% progression
Bill has been formally introduced and read for the first time in its house of origin (3/18/2025)

Key Dates

Next Step
Referred to the Assembly Standing Committee on Judiciary
Next Step
Assembly Committee
Referred to the Assembly Standing Committee on Judiciary
Hearing has not been scheduled yet
Assembly Judiciary Hearing
Assembly Committee
Assembly Judiciary Hearing
Assembly Judiciary Hearing
Read first time. To print.
Assembly Floor
Read first time. To print.
Read first time. To print.

Latest Voting History

April 22, 2025
PASS
Assembly Committee
Assembly Judiciary Hearing
AyesNoesNVRTotalResult
93012PASS

Contacts

Profile
Ash KalraD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Rebecca Bauer-KahanD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Isaac BryanD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Damon ConnollyD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Diane DixonR
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
0 of 12 row(s) selected.
Page 1 of 3
Select All Legislators
Profile
Ash KalraD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Rebecca Bauer-KahanD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Isaac BryanD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Damon ConnollyD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Diane DixonR
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Bill EssayliR
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Blanca PachecoD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Diane PapanD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Kate SanchezR
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Rick ZburD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
John HarabedianD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Catherine StefaniD
Assembly Member
Committee Member