AB-1523
Justice & Public Safety

Court-ordered mediation.

Enrolled
CA
2025-2026 Regular Session
0
0
Track

Key Takeaways

  • Increases the maximum amount for court-ordered mediation from $50,000 to $75,000 starting January 2027.
  • Requires cases to be trial-ready with no discovery disputes before courts can order mediation.
  • Mandates courts to provide free mediators if parties cannot agree on one within 15 days.
  • Requires mediation to conclude at least 120 days before trial with a formal agreement or non-agreement.

Summary

The California Assembly Judiciary Committee, led by Chair Kalra, proposes new parameters for court-ordered mediation in civil cases through legislation that raises the maximum amount in controversy from $50,000 to $75,000 beginning January 1, 2027.

The measure establishes specific prerequisites before courts may order mediation: cases must have a trial date set, at least one party must express interest in mediation, and no ongoing discovery disputes may exist. Parties receive notification of their right to select a mutually agreeable mediator and may opt for remote mediation sessions upon joint agreement. If parties cannot agree on a mediator within 15 days, the court appoints one at no cost using Judicial Council standards.

Under the new framework, mediation must conclude with either an agreement or formal statement of non-agreement at least 120 days before trial, maintaining the original trial schedule. The determination of amount in controversy excludes consideration of liability questions, defenses, or comparative negligence, and does not prejudice subsequent case value findings. Until January 2027, the current $50,000 threshold remains in effect without these additional procedural requirements.

Key Dates

Vote on Assembly Floor
Assembly Floor
Vote on Assembly Floor
AB 1523 Judiciary Concurrence in Senate Amendments By KALRA
Vote on Senate Floor
Senate Floor
Vote on Senate Floor
Assembly 3rd Reading AB1523 JUD. (Kalra) By Becker
Senate Judiciary Hearing
Senate Committee
Senate Judiciary Hearing
Do pass
Vote on Assembly Floor
Assembly Floor
Vote on Assembly Floor
AB 1523 JUD. Assembly Third Reading By KALRA
Assembly Judiciary Hearing
Assembly Committee
Assembly Judiciary Hearing
Do pass
Introduced
Assembly Floor
Introduced
Read first time. To print.

Contacts

No results.
0 of 0 row(s) selected.
Page 1 of 0
Select All Legislators

Get Involved

Act Now!

Email the authors or create an email template to send to all relevant legislators.

70% progression
Bill has passed both houses in identical form and is being prepared for the Governor (9/3/2025)

Latest Voting History

September 3, 2025
PASS
Assembly Floor
Vote on Assembly Floor
AyesNoesNVRTotalResult
750479PASS

Key Takeaways

  • Increases the maximum amount for court-ordered mediation from $50,000 to $75,000 starting January 2027.
  • Requires cases to be trial-ready with no discovery disputes before courts can order mediation.
  • Mandates courts to provide free mediators if parties cannot agree on one within 15 days.
  • Requires mediation to conclude at least 120 days before trial with a formal agreement or non-agreement.

Get Involved

Act Now!

Email the authors or create an email template to send to all relevant legislators.

Summary

The California Assembly Judiciary Committee, led by Chair Kalra, proposes new parameters for court-ordered mediation in civil cases through legislation that raises the maximum amount in controversy from $50,000 to $75,000 beginning January 1, 2027.

The measure establishes specific prerequisites before courts may order mediation: cases must have a trial date set, at least one party must express interest in mediation, and no ongoing discovery disputes may exist. Parties receive notification of their right to select a mutually agreeable mediator and may opt for remote mediation sessions upon joint agreement. If parties cannot agree on a mediator within 15 days, the court appoints one at no cost using Judicial Council standards.

Under the new framework, mediation must conclude with either an agreement or formal statement of non-agreement at least 120 days before trial, maintaining the original trial schedule. The determination of amount in controversy excludes consideration of liability questions, defenses, or comparative negligence, and does not prejudice subsequent case value findings. Until January 2027, the current $50,000 threshold remains in effect without these additional procedural requirements.

70% progression
Bill has passed both houses in identical form and is being prepared for the Governor (9/3/2025)

Key Dates

Vote on Assembly Floor
Assembly Floor
Vote on Assembly Floor
AB 1523 Judiciary Concurrence in Senate Amendments By KALRA
Vote on Senate Floor
Senate Floor
Vote on Senate Floor
Assembly 3rd Reading AB1523 JUD. (Kalra) By Becker
Senate Judiciary Hearing
Senate Committee
Senate Judiciary Hearing
Do pass
Vote on Assembly Floor
Assembly Floor
Vote on Assembly Floor
AB 1523 JUD. Assembly Third Reading By KALRA
Assembly Judiciary Hearing
Assembly Committee
Assembly Judiciary Hearing
Do pass
Introduced
Assembly Floor
Introduced
Read first time. To print.

Latest Voting History

September 3, 2025
PASS
Assembly Floor
Vote on Assembly Floor
AyesNoesNVRTotalResult
750479PASS

Contacts

No results.
0 of 0 row(s) selected.
Page 1 of 0
Select All Legislators