veeto
Home
Bills
Feedback
hamburger
    Privacy PolicyResources
    © 2025 Veeto.
    AB-1523
    Justice & Public Safety

    Court-ordered mediation.

    Enrolled
    CA
    ∙
    2025-2026 Regular Session
    0
    0
    Track
    Track

    Key Takeaways

    • Increases the maximum amount for court-ordered mediation from $50,000 to $75,000 starting January 2027.
    • Requires cases to be trial-ready with no discovery disputes before courts can order mediation.
    • Mandates courts to provide free mediators if parties cannot agree on one within 15 days.
    • Requires mediation to conclude at least 120 days before trial with a formal agreement or non-agreement.

    Summary

    The California Assembly Judiciary Committee, led by Chair Kalra, proposes new parameters for court-ordered mediation in civil cases through legislation that raises the maximum amount in controversy from $50,000 to $75,000 beginning January 1, 2027.

    The measure establishes specific prerequisites before courts may order mediation: cases must have a trial date set, at least one party must express interest in mediation, and no ongoing discovery disputes may exist. Parties receive notification of their right to select a mutually agreeable mediator and may opt for remote mediation sessions upon joint agreement. If parties cannot agree on a mediator within 15 days, the court appoints one at no cost using Judicial Council standards.

    Under the new framework, mediation must conclude with either an agreement or formal statement of non-agreement at least 120 days before trial, maintaining the original trial schedule. The determination of amount in controversy excludes consideration of liability questions, defenses, or comparative negligence, and does not prejudice subsequent case value findings. Until January 2027, the current $50,000 threshold remains in effect without these additional procedural requirements.

    Key Dates

    Vote on Assembly Floor
    Assembly Floor
    Vote on Assembly Floor
    AB 1523 Judiciary Concurrence in Senate Amendments By KALRA
    Vote on Senate Floor
    Senate Floor
    Vote on Senate Floor
    Assembly 3rd Reading AB1523 JUD. (Kalra) By Becker
    Senate Judiciary Hearing
    Senate Committee
    Senate Judiciary Hearing
    Do pass
    Vote on Assembly Floor
    Assembly Floor
    Vote on Assembly Floor
    AB 1523 JUD. Assembly Third Reading By KALRA
    Assembly Judiciary Hearing
    Assembly Committee
    Assembly Judiciary Hearing
    Do pass
    Introduced
    Assembly Floor
    Introduced
    Read first time. To print.

    Contacts

    No results.
    0 of 0 row(s) selected.
    Page 1 of 0
    Select All Legislators

    Get Involved

    Act Now!

    Email the authors or create an email template to send to all relevant legislators.

    70% progression
    Bill has passed both houses in identical form and is being prepared for the Governor (9/3/2025)

    Latest Voting History

    View History
    September 3, 2025
    PASS
    Assembly Floor
    Vote on Assembly Floor
    AyesNoesNVRTotalResult
    750479PASS

    Key Takeaways

    • Increases the maximum amount for court-ordered mediation from $50,000 to $75,000 starting January 2027.
    • Requires cases to be trial-ready with no discovery disputes before courts can order mediation.
    • Mandates courts to provide free mediators if parties cannot agree on one within 15 days.
    • Requires mediation to conclude at least 120 days before trial with a formal agreement or non-agreement.

    Get Involved

    Act Now!

    Email the authors or create an email template to send to all relevant legislators.

    Summary

    The California Assembly Judiciary Committee, led by Chair Kalra, proposes new parameters for court-ordered mediation in civil cases through legislation that raises the maximum amount in controversy from $50,000 to $75,000 beginning January 1, 2027.

    The measure establishes specific prerequisites before courts may order mediation: cases must have a trial date set, at least one party must express interest in mediation, and no ongoing discovery disputes may exist. Parties receive notification of their right to select a mutually agreeable mediator and may opt for remote mediation sessions upon joint agreement. If parties cannot agree on a mediator within 15 days, the court appoints one at no cost using Judicial Council standards.

    Under the new framework, mediation must conclude with either an agreement or formal statement of non-agreement at least 120 days before trial, maintaining the original trial schedule. The determination of amount in controversy excludes consideration of liability questions, defenses, or comparative negligence, and does not prejudice subsequent case value findings. Until January 2027, the current $50,000 threshold remains in effect without these additional procedural requirements.

    70% progression
    Bill has passed both houses in identical form and is being prepared for the Governor (9/3/2025)

    Key Dates

    Vote on Assembly Floor
    Assembly Floor
    Vote on Assembly Floor
    AB 1523 Judiciary Concurrence in Senate Amendments By KALRA
    Vote on Senate Floor
    Senate Floor
    Vote on Senate Floor
    Assembly 3rd Reading AB1523 JUD. (Kalra) By Becker
    Senate Judiciary Hearing
    Senate Committee
    Senate Judiciary Hearing
    Do pass
    Vote on Assembly Floor
    Assembly Floor
    Vote on Assembly Floor
    AB 1523 JUD. Assembly Third Reading By KALRA
    Assembly Judiciary Hearing
    Assembly Committee
    Assembly Judiciary Hearing
    Do pass
    Introduced
    Assembly Floor
    Introduced
    Read first time. To print.

    Latest Voting History

    View History
    September 3, 2025
    PASS
    Assembly Floor
    Vote on Assembly Floor
    AyesNoesNVRTotalResult
    750479PASS

    Contacts

    No results.
    0 of 0 row(s) selected.
    Page 1 of 0
    Select All Legislators