AB-1524
Government Operations

Courts: fees.

Introduced
CA
2025-2026 Regular Session
0
0
Track

Key Takeaways

  • Prohibits courts from charging videoconferencing fees that exceed their actual costs to provide the service.
  • Requires electronic court records to be viewable at courthouses and available for public duplication.
  • Allows the public to use their own equipment to copy court records without fees, unless it risks damaging records.
  • Mandates annual reporting to the Legislature on all court fees not explicitly authorized by law.

Summary

The California Assembly Judiciary Committee proposes new limits on court fees and expanded public access to electronic records through legislation that modifies how courts charge for services and manage digital documents. The measure prohibits courts from charging videoconferencing fees that exceed their actual costs and requires electronic court records to be viewable on-site, regardless of remote accessibility.

Under the proposal, members of the public gain the right to photograph or copy accessible court records using their own equipment without fees, provided the reproduction method does not damage records or compromise court computer systems. Courts may impose reasonable restrictions to protect document safety and maintain orderly operations. The legislation also mandates that any fees not explicitly authorized by existing law receive Judicial Council approval.

The Judicial Council must submit detailed reports to the Legislature documenting court fees, beginning with a comprehensive review of all fees charged through 2026, followed by annual updates on new fees. These reports will include information about services provided, fee amounts, approval dates, usage statistics, and actual costs to courts. The measure defines allowable charges as the estimated per-user cost of providing services not directly funded by the Legislature.

Key Dates

Next Step
Referred to the Assembly Standing Committee on Appropriations
Next Step
Assembly Committee
Referred to the Assembly Standing Committee on Appropriations
Hearing has not been scheduled yet
Assembly Judiciary Hearing
Assembly Committee
Assembly Judiciary Hearing
Assembly Judiciary Hearing
Read first time. To print.
Assembly Floor
Read first time. To print.
Read first time. To print.

Contacts

Profile
Joaquin ArambulaD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Buffy WicksD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Lisa CalderonD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Mike FongD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Diane DixonR
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
0 of 15 row(s) selected.
Page 1 of 3
Select All Legislators
Profile
Joaquin ArambulaD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Buffy WicksD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Lisa CalderonD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Mike FongD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Diane DixonR
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Gregg HartD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Blanca PachecoD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Gail PellerinD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Kate SanchezR
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Tri TaR
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Jessica CalozaD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Mark GonzalezD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Heather HadwickR
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Jose SolacheD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Sade ElhawaryD
Assembly Member
Committee Member

Get Involved

Act Now!

Email the authors or create an email template to send to all relevant legislators.

Introduced By

10% progression
Bill has been formally introduced and read for the first time in its house of origin (3/18/2025)

Latest Voting History

April 22, 2025
PASS
Assembly Committee
Assembly Judiciary Hearing
AyesNoesNVRTotalResult
120012PASS

Key Takeaways

  • Prohibits courts from charging videoconferencing fees that exceed their actual costs to provide the service.
  • Requires electronic court records to be viewable at courthouses and available for public duplication.
  • Allows the public to use their own equipment to copy court records without fees, unless it risks damaging records.
  • Mandates annual reporting to the Legislature on all court fees not explicitly authorized by law.

Get Involved

Act Now!

Email the authors or create an email template to send to all relevant legislators.

Introduced By

Summary

The California Assembly Judiciary Committee proposes new limits on court fees and expanded public access to electronic records through legislation that modifies how courts charge for services and manage digital documents. The measure prohibits courts from charging videoconferencing fees that exceed their actual costs and requires electronic court records to be viewable on-site, regardless of remote accessibility.

Under the proposal, members of the public gain the right to photograph or copy accessible court records using their own equipment without fees, provided the reproduction method does not damage records or compromise court computer systems. Courts may impose reasonable restrictions to protect document safety and maintain orderly operations. The legislation also mandates that any fees not explicitly authorized by existing law receive Judicial Council approval.

The Judicial Council must submit detailed reports to the Legislature documenting court fees, beginning with a comprehensive review of all fees charged through 2026, followed by annual updates on new fees. These reports will include information about services provided, fee amounts, approval dates, usage statistics, and actual costs to courts. The measure defines allowable charges as the estimated per-user cost of providing services not directly funded by the Legislature.

10% progression
Bill has been formally introduced and read for the first time in its house of origin (3/18/2025)

Key Dates

Next Step
Referred to the Assembly Standing Committee on Appropriations
Next Step
Assembly Committee
Referred to the Assembly Standing Committee on Appropriations
Hearing has not been scheduled yet
Assembly Judiciary Hearing
Assembly Committee
Assembly Judiciary Hearing
Assembly Judiciary Hearing
Read first time. To print.
Assembly Floor
Read first time. To print.
Read first time. To print.

Latest Voting History

April 22, 2025
PASS
Assembly Committee
Assembly Judiciary Hearing
AyesNoesNVRTotalResult
120012PASS

Contacts

Profile
Joaquin ArambulaD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Buffy WicksD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Lisa CalderonD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Mike FongD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
Profile
Diane DixonR
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Not Contacted
Not Contacted
0 of 15 row(s) selected.
Page 1 of 3
Select All Legislators
Profile
Joaquin ArambulaD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Buffy WicksD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Lisa CalderonD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Mike FongD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Diane DixonR
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Gregg HartD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Blanca PachecoD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Gail PellerinD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Kate SanchezR
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Tri TaR
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Jessica CalozaD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Mark GonzalezD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Heather HadwickR
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Jose SolacheD
Assembly Member
Committee Member
Profile
Sade ElhawaryD
Assembly Member
Committee Member