Oppose AB-412: Burdensome AI Compliance Measures

Subject: Oppose AB-412: Burdensome requirements threaten AI innovation and increase legal risks

My name is [Full Name], and I am writing to express my strong opposition to AB-412, which addresses the use of copyrighted materials in training generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) systems. This bill, while well-intentioned, imposes burdensome requirements that could stifle innovation and hinder the growth of AI technologies in California. The documentation requirements outlined in Sections 3116(a) and (b) are particularly concerning. They demand that developers meticulously document all copyrighted materials and their owners, which is an impractical task for those working with large datasets. This could lead to significant administrative burdens and delay the release of new technologies. Moreover, the stringent compliance timelines in Section 3117(a.1) are unrealistic. Requiring developers to provide a comprehensive list of copyrighted materials within seven days of a request is not feasible for complex systems, potentially leading to non-compliance and legal issues. The financial risks posed by Section 3118(a), which allows for civil action and substantial penalties, further discourage investment in AI development. The extended record retention requirement in Section 3116(e) adds unnecessary costs and complicates data management. Additionally, the potential for increased litigation, as authorized by Sections 3118(b) and (c), creates a hostile environment for developers, deterring innovation and collaboration. In conclusion, AB-412 introduces complex compliance requirements and potential legal challenges that could hinder the development and deployment of GenAI technologies. I urge you to reconsider this bill and its implications for the AI industry in California. Thank you for considering my perspective. Sincerely,