Oppose AB-412's burdensome AI documentation requirements

Subject: Oppose AB-412: Burdensome requirements threaten AI innovation and impose financial risks

My name is [Full Name], and I am writing to express my strong opposition to AB-412. This bill, which mandates extensive documentation of copyrighted materials used in training generative AI systems, poses significant challenges that could stifle innovation and burden developers with impractical requirements. The documentation requirements outlined in Sections 3116(a-b) are particularly concerning. They demand that developers identify and document all copyrighted materials and their owners, which is an overwhelming task for those working with large datasets. This could lead to delays in AI advancements and discourage investment in this critical field. Moreover, the compliance deadlines in Section 3117(a.1) are unreasonably stringent. Requiring developers to provide a comprehensive list of materials within seven days of a request is impractical, especially for complex AI models. This could result in non-compliance and expose developers to legal challenges and financial penalties, as detailed in Section 3118(a). The extended record retention requirement in Section 3116(e) further exacerbates the issue by increasing storage costs and administrative burdens. These provisions collectively create a hostile environment for AI development, potentially hindering technological progress and innovation. In conclusion, AB-412's approach is flawed and could have detrimental effects on the AI industry. I urge you to reconsider this bill and its implications, as it stands to harm rather than help the advancement of AI technologies. Thank you for considering my perspective. Sincerely,