Stop SB-684: Reject polluter liability burdens

Subject: Oppose SB-684: Addressing Economic Risks and Legal Challenges for Fossil Fuel Companies

My name is [Full Name], and I am writing as a concerned constituent to express my opposition to SB-684, the Polluters Pay Climate Superfund Act of 2025. While the bill aims to address climate change by holding fossil fuel companies financially accountable, it presents several significant concerns that could have adverse effects on California's economy and legal landscape. Firstly, the bill imposes strict financial liabilities on fossil fuel companies, which could destabilize their operations and lead to increased costs for consumers as these companies may pass on the expenses. This financial burden could also result in job losses and reduced investments in the energy sector, negatively impacting the state's economy. Moreover, the process of determining responsible parties and assessing cost recovery demands is likely to lead to legal disputes and administrative challenges. The potential for increased litigation, as outlined in Section 71371.5, could create prolonged legal battles, adding uncertainty for businesses operating in California. Additionally, the bill's strict liability and financial penalties, as described in Section 71371.1, seem punitive and could disrupt business operations, especially with the authority to revoke or suspend business licenses for non-compliance (Section 71373.5). These measures could deter businesses from operating in the state, further affecting economic stability. In conclusion, while the intention behind SB-684 is commendable, its approach could lead to unintended economic and legal consequences. I urge you to reconsider the bill's provisions and explore alternative solutions that balance environmental responsibility with economic viability. Thank you for considering my perspective. Sincerely,